Cargando…

Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for upstaging in intraprostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy: Different patterns of spread exist in lesions at different locations

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of the clinical staging is crucial for determining the need for radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa). However, the current methods for PCa staging may yield incorrect results. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze independent predictors of postope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Shangrong, Jiang, Yuchen, Liang, Zhengxin, Chen, Shuaiqi, Sun, Guangyu, Ma, Shenfei, Chen, Kaifei, Liu, Ranlu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10524000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6401
_version_ 1785110658538274816
author Wu, Shangrong
Jiang, Yuchen
Liang, Zhengxin
Chen, Shuaiqi
Sun, Guangyu
Ma, Shenfei
Chen, Kaifei
Liu, Ranlu
author_facet Wu, Shangrong
Jiang, Yuchen
Liang, Zhengxin
Chen, Shuaiqi
Sun, Guangyu
Ma, Shenfei
Chen, Kaifei
Liu, Ranlu
author_sort Wu, Shangrong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of the clinical staging is crucial for determining the need for radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa). However, the current methods for PCa staging may yield incorrect results. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze independent predictors of postoperative upstaging of intraprostatic cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from intraprostatic cancer patients who underwent radical surgery between March 2019 and December 2022. Intraprostatic cancer was defined as a lesion confined to the prostate, excluding cases where multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) showed the lesion in contact with the prostatic capsule. We assessed independent predictors of extraprostatic extension (EPE) and analyzed their association with positive surgical margin (PSM) status. In addition, based on the distance of the lesion from the capsule on mpMRI, we divided the patients into non‐transition zone and transition zone groups for further analysis. RESULTS: A total of 500 patients were included in our study. Logistic regression analysis revealed that biopsy Gleason grade group (GG) (odds ratio, OR: 1.370, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.093–1.718) and perineural invasion (PNI) (OR: 2.746, 95% CI: 1.420–5.309) were predictive factors for postoperative EPE. Both biopsy GG and PNI were associated with lateral (GG: OR: 1.270, 95% CI: 1.074–1.501; PNI: OR: 2.733, 95% CI: 1.521–4.911) and basal (GG: OR: 1.491, 95% CI: 1.194–1.862; PNI: OR: 3.730, 95% CI: 1.929–7.214) PSM but not with apex PSM (GG: OR: 1.176, 95% CI: 0.989–1.399; PNI: OR: 1.204, 95% CI: 0.609–2.381) after RP. Finally, PNI was an independent predictor of EPE in the transition zone (OR: 11.235, 95% CI: 2.779–45.428) but not in the non‐transition zone (OR: 1.942, 95% CI: 0.920–4.098). CONCLUSION: PNI and higher GG may indicate upstaging of tumors in patients with intraprostatic carcinoma. These two factors are associated with PSM in locations other than the apex of the prostate. Importantly, cancer in the transition zone of the prostate is more likely to spread externally through nerve invasion than cancer in the non‐transition zone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10524000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105240002023-09-28 Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for upstaging in intraprostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy: Different patterns of spread exist in lesions at different locations Wu, Shangrong Jiang, Yuchen Liang, Zhengxin Chen, Shuaiqi Sun, Guangyu Ma, Shenfei Chen, Kaifei Liu, Ranlu Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of the clinical staging is crucial for determining the need for radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa). However, the current methods for PCa staging may yield incorrect results. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze independent predictors of postoperative upstaging of intraprostatic cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from intraprostatic cancer patients who underwent radical surgery between March 2019 and December 2022. Intraprostatic cancer was defined as a lesion confined to the prostate, excluding cases where multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) showed the lesion in contact with the prostatic capsule. We assessed independent predictors of extraprostatic extension (EPE) and analyzed their association with positive surgical margin (PSM) status. In addition, based on the distance of the lesion from the capsule on mpMRI, we divided the patients into non‐transition zone and transition zone groups for further analysis. RESULTS: A total of 500 patients were included in our study. Logistic regression analysis revealed that biopsy Gleason grade group (GG) (odds ratio, OR: 1.370, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.093–1.718) and perineural invasion (PNI) (OR: 2.746, 95% CI: 1.420–5.309) were predictive factors for postoperative EPE. Both biopsy GG and PNI were associated with lateral (GG: OR: 1.270, 95% CI: 1.074–1.501; PNI: OR: 2.733, 95% CI: 1.521–4.911) and basal (GG: OR: 1.491, 95% CI: 1.194–1.862; PNI: OR: 3.730, 95% CI: 1.929–7.214) PSM but not with apex PSM (GG: OR: 1.176, 95% CI: 0.989–1.399; PNI: OR: 1.204, 95% CI: 0.609–2.381) after RP. Finally, PNI was an independent predictor of EPE in the transition zone (OR: 11.235, 95% CI: 2.779–45.428) but not in the non‐transition zone (OR: 1.942, 95% CI: 0.920–4.098). CONCLUSION: PNI and higher GG may indicate upstaging of tumors in patients with intraprostatic carcinoma. These two factors are associated with PSM in locations other than the apex of the prostate. Importantly, cancer in the transition zone of the prostate is more likely to spread externally through nerve invasion than cancer in the non‐transition zone. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10524000/ /pubmed/37537798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6401 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Wu, Shangrong
Jiang, Yuchen
Liang, Zhengxin
Chen, Shuaiqi
Sun, Guangyu
Ma, Shenfei
Chen, Kaifei
Liu, Ranlu
Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for upstaging in intraprostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy: Different patterns of spread exist in lesions at different locations
title Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for upstaging in intraprostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy: Different patterns of spread exist in lesions at different locations
title_full Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for upstaging in intraprostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy: Different patterns of spread exist in lesions at different locations
title_fullStr Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for upstaging in intraprostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy: Different patterns of spread exist in lesions at different locations
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for upstaging in intraprostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy: Different patterns of spread exist in lesions at different locations
title_short Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for upstaging in intraprostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy: Different patterns of spread exist in lesions at different locations
title_sort comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for upstaging in intraprostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy: different patterns of spread exist in lesions at different locations
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10524000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6401
work_keys_str_mv AT wushangrong comprehensiveanalysisofpredictivefactorsforupstaginginintraprostaticcancerafterradicalprostatectomydifferentpatternsofspreadexistinlesionsatdifferentlocations
AT jiangyuchen comprehensiveanalysisofpredictivefactorsforupstaginginintraprostaticcancerafterradicalprostatectomydifferentpatternsofspreadexistinlesionsatdifferentlocations
AT liangzhengxin comprehensiveanalysisofpredictivefactorsforupstaginginintraprostaticcancerafterradicalprostatectomydifferentpatternsofspreadexistinlesionsatdifferentlocations
AT chenshuaiqi comprehensiveanalysisofpredictivefactorsforupstaginginintraprostaticcancerafterradicalprostatectomydifferentpatternsofspreadexistinlesionsatdifferentlocations
AT sunguangyu comprehensiveanalysisofpredictivefactorsforupstaginginintraprostaticcancerafterradicalprostatectomydifferentpatternsofspreadexistinlesionsatdifferentlocations
AT mashenfei comprehensiveanalysisofpredictivefactorsforupstaginginintraprostaticcancerafterradicalprostatectomydifferentpatternsofspreadexistinlesionsatdifferentlocations
AT chenkaifei comprehensiveanalysisofpredictivefactorsforupstaginginintraprostaticcancerafterradicalprostatectomydifferentpatternsofspreadexistinlesionsatdifferentlocations
AT liuranlu comprehensiveanalysisofpredictivefactorsforupstaginginintraprostaticcancerafterradicalprostatectomydifferentpatternsofspreadexistinlesionsatdifferentlocations