Comparison of Live and Remote Video Ratings of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia

BACKGROUND: Video recordings of neurological examinations are often used in clinical trials. The Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is a widely used clinical scale for ataxic patients. Despite several advantages of video ratings, correlation between live ratings and remote video‐rating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taheri Amin, Arian, Faber, Jennifer, Önder, Demet, Kimmich, Okka, Synofzik, Matthis, Ashizawa, Tetsuo, Klockgether, Thomas, Grobe‐Einsler, Marcus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Brief Reports
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37772290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13843
_version_ 1785110692537303040
author Taheri Amin, Arian
Faber, Jennifer
Önder, Demet
Kimmich, Okka
Synofzik, Matthis
Ashizawa, Tetsuo
Klockgether, Thomas
Grobe‐Einsler, Marcus
author_facet Taheri Amin, Arian
Faber, Jennifer
Önder, Demet
Kimmich, Okka
Synofzik, Matthis
Ashizawa, Tetsuo
Klockgether, Thomas
Grobe‐Einsler, Marcus
author_sort Taheri Amin, Arian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Video recordings of neurological examinations are often used in clinical trials. The Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is a widely used clinical scale for ataxic patients. Despite several advantages of video ratings, correlation between live ratings and remote video‐ratings has not been systematically investigated. OBJECTIVE: To compare live and remote video assessment of SARA. METHODS: Full SARA examinations of 69 patients with cerebellar ataxia were recorded on video. Live rating from site investigators were compared with remote video rating of three experienced ataxia clinicians using Bland–Altman analysis. RESULTS: Live and remote video ratings showed a high level of agreement for the complete score (bias = 0.09, with standard deviation = 2.00) and all single SARA items (bias <0.20 for all items). CONCLUSION: Remote video ratings of SARA are a reliable means to assess severity of ataxia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10525045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105250452023-09-28 Comparison of Live and Remote Video Ratings of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia Taheri Amin, Arian Faber, Jennifer Önder, Demet Kimmich, Okka Synofzik, Matthis Ashizawa, Tetsuo Klockgether, Thomas Grobe‐Einsler, Marcus Mov Disord Clin Pract Brief Reports BACKGROUND: Video recordings of neurological examinations are often used in clinical trials. The Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is a widely used clinical scale for ataxic patients. Despite several advantages of video ratings, correlation between live ratings and remote video‐ratings has not been systematically investigated. OBJECTIVE: To compare live and remote video assessment of SARA. METHODS: Full SARA examinations of 69 patients with cerebellar ataxia were recorded on video. Live rating from site investigators were compared with remote video rating of three experienced ataxia clinicians using Bland–Altman analysis. RESULTS: Live and remote video ratings showed a high level of agreement for the complete score (bias = 0.09, with standard deviation = 2.00) and all single SARA items (bias <0.20 for all items). CONCLUSION: Remote video ratings of SARA are a reliable means to assess severity of ataxia. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10525045/ /pubmed/37772290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13843 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Reports
Taheri Amin, Arian
Faber, Jennifer
Önder, Demet
Kimmich, Okka
Synofzik, Matthis
Ashizawa, Tetsuo
Klockgether, Thomas
Grobe‐Einsler, Marcus
Comparison of Live and Remote Video Ratings of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
title Comparison of Live and Remote Video Ratings of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
title_full Comparison of Live and Remote Video Ratings of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
title_fullStr Comparison of Live and Remote Video Ratings of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Live and Remote Video Ratings of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
title_short Comparison of Live and Remote Video Ratings of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
title_sort comparison of live and remote video ratings of the scale for assessment and rating of ataxia
topic Brief Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37772290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13843
work_keys_str_mv AT taheriaminarian comparisonofliveandremotevideoratingsofthescaleforassessmentandratingofataxia
AT faberjennifer comparisonofliveandremotevideoratingsofthescaleforassessmentandratingofataxia
AT onderdemet comparisonofliveandremotevideoratingsofthescaleforassessmentandratingofataxia
AT kimmichokka comparisonofliveandremotevideoratingsofthescaleforassessmentandratingofataxia
AT synofzikmatthis comparisonofliveandremotevideoratingsofthescaleforassessmentandratingofataxia
AT ashizawatetsuo comparisonofliveandremotevideoratingsofthescaleforassessmentandratingofataxia
AT klockgetherthomas comparisonofliveandremotevideoratingsofthescaleforassessmentandratingofataxia
AT grobeeinslermarcus comparisonofliveandremotevideoratingsofthescaleforassessmentandratingofataxia

Ejemplares similares