Cargando…

Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment

Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Ling, Fields, Noelle L., Westmore, Megan R., Daniel, Kathryn M., Troutman, Brooke A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13090767
_version_ 1785110731528601600
author Xu, Ling
Fields, Noelle L.
Westmore, Megan R.
Daniel, Kathryn M.
Troutman, Brooke A.
author_facet Xu, Ling
Fields, Noelle L.
Westmore, Megan R.
Daniel, Kathryn M.
Troutman, Brooke A.
author_sort Xu, Ling
collection PubMed
description Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items remained to use except for adapting the last item. Approximately 130 older adults with cognitive impairment completed the UBACC screening. Item-by-item descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), group comparisons of each item, as well as total sum scores of the UBACC were conducted. Results showed that the items that were most often answered correctly included item #10 (participant will be paid), item #4 (study is voluntary), and item #5 (can withdraw at any time). Conversely, the items that were most often answered incorrectly included item #9 (not any benefit potentially), item #7 (potential risk or discomfort), and item #6 (tasks during participation). Respondents with mild cognitive impairment had higher correct answer rates than those with advanced cognitive impairment. The UBACC screening tool has relative utility for older participants with cognitive impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10525220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105252202023-09-28 Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment Xu, Ling Fields, Noelle L. Westmore, Megan R. Daniel, Kathryn M. Troutman, Brooke A. Behav Sci (Basel) Brief Report Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items remained to use except for adapting the last item. Approximately 130 older adults with cognitive impairment completed the UBACC screening. Item-by-item descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), group comparisons of each item, as well as total sum scores of the UBACC were conducted. Results showed that the items that were most often answered correctly included item #10 (participant will be paid), item #4 (study is voluntary), and item #5 (can withdraw at any time). Conversely, the items that were most often answered incorrectly included item #9 (not any benefit potentially), item #7 (potential risk or discomfort), and item #6 (tasks during participation). Respondents with mild cognitive impairment had higher correct answer rates than those with advanced cognitive impairment. The UBACC screening tool has relative utility for older participants with cognitive impairment. MDPI 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10525220/ /pubmed/37754045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13090767 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Xu, Ling
Fields, Noelle L.
Westmore, Megan R.
Daniel, Kathryn M.
Troutman, Brooke A.
Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
title Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
title_full Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
title_fullStr Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
title_full_unstemmed Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
title_short Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
title_sort application of a decisional capacity assessment for older research participants with cognitive impairment
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13090767
work_keys_str_mv AT xuling applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment
AT fieldsnoellel applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment
AT westmoremeganr applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment
AT danielkathrynm applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment
AT troutmanbrookea applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment