Cargando…
Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13090767 |
_version_ | 1785110731528601600 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Ling Fields, Noelle L. Westmore, Megan R. Daniel, Kathryn M. Troutman, Brooke A. |
author_facet | Xu, Ling Fields, Noelle L. Westmore, Megan R. Daniel, Kathryn M. Troutman, Brooke A. |
author_sort | Xu, Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items remained to use except for adapting the last item. Approximately 130 older adults with cognitive impairment completed the UBACC screening. Item-by-item descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), group comparisons of each item, as well as total sum scores of the UBACC were conducted. Results showed that the items that were most often answered correctly included item #10 (participant will be paid), item #4 (study is voluntary), and item #5 (can withdraw at any time). Conversely, the items that were most often answered incorrectly included item #9 (not any benefit potentially), item #7 (potential risk or discomfort), and item #6 (tasks during participation). Respondents with mild cognitive impairment had higher correct answer rates than those with advanced cognitive impairment. The UBACC screening tool has relative utility for older participants with cognitive impairment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10525220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105252202023-09-28 Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment Xu, Ling Fields, Noelle L. Westmore, Megan R. Daniel, Kathryn M. Troutman, Brooke A. Behav Sci (Basel) Brief Report Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items remained to use except for adapting the last item. Approximately 130 older adults with cognitive impairment completed the UBACC screening. Item-by-item descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), group comparisons of each item, as well as total sum scores of the UBACC were conducted. Results showed that the items that were most often answered correctly included item #10 (participant will be paid), item #4 (study is voluntary), and item #5 (can withdraw at any time). Conversely, the items that were most often answered incorrectly included item #9 (not any benefit potentially), item #7 (potential risk or discomfort), and item #6 (tasks during participation). Respondents with mild cognitive impairment had higher correct answer rates than those with advanced cognitive impairment. The UBACC screening tool has relative utility for older participants with cognitive impairment. MDPI 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10525220/ /pubmed/37754045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13090767 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Xu, Ling Fields, Noelle L. Westmore, Megan R. Daniel, Kathryn M. Troutman, Brooke A. Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment |
title | Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment |
title_full | Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment |
title_fullStr | Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment |
title_short | Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment |
title_sort | application of a decisional capacity assessment for older research participants with cognitive impairment |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13090767 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuling applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment AT fieldsnoellel applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment AT westmoremeganr applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment AT danielkathrynm applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment AT troutmanbrookea applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment |