Cargando…
The Effect of a Bacillus Probiotic and Essential Oils Compared to an Ionophore on the Rumen Microbiome Composition of Feedlot Cattle
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Consumer preferences are demanding the removal of antibiotic growth promoters from animal diets. To meet the demand of animal protein for the growing human population, alternative feed additives, such as probiotics and essential oils, need to be investigated to increase the overall e...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37760327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13182927 |
_version_ | 1785110738526797824 |
---|---|
author | Linde, Dina A. Schokker, Dirkjan du Toit, Cornelius J. L. Ramkilawon, Gopika D. van Marle-Köster, Este |
author_facet | Linde, Dina A. Schokker, Dirkjan du Toit, Cornelius J. L. Ramkilawon, Gopika D. van Marle-Köster, Este |
author_sort | Linde, Dina A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Consumer preferences are demanding the removal of antibiotic growth promoters from animal diets. To meet the demand of animal protein for the growing human population, alternative feed additives, such as probiotics and essential oils, need to be investigated to increase the overall efficiency of farm animals. The microorganisms in the rumen are important to the functioning of the animal as they produce the majority of energy the animal uses for production. In this study, the effect of essential oils and a probiotic was compared to the effect of monensin, an antibiotic growth promoter, on the rumen microbiome. There were no substantial differences in the effect of the two natural feed additives compared to monensin on the microorganisms in the rumen. These feed additives hold potential as alternatives to the use of antibiotic growth promoters; large scale production studies are needed to confirm growth performance. ABSTRACT: The rising concern of antibiotic growth promoter use in livestock has necessitated the investigation into alternative feed additives. The effect of a probiotic and essential oils to an ionophore on the rumen microbiome composition of Bonsmara bulls raised under feedlot conditions was compared. Forty-eight Bonsmara weaners were allocated to four groups: a group with basal diet (CON) and three groups supplemented with monensin (MON), probiotic (PRO), and essential oils (EO). During the 120 days feeding period, rumen content was collected from four animals per group within each phase via a stomach tube for 16S rRNA and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing as well as volatile fatty acid analysis. In the starter phase, MON had a significantly lower acetate to propionate ratio and a higher Succinivibrionaceae abundance. The abundance of Lachnospiraceae was significantly higher in EO compared to MON. In the finisher phase, PRO had a significantly higher bacterial diversity. The alpha diversity did not differ between the fungal populations of the groups. The abundance of Proteobacteria was the lowest in PRO compared to the other groups. Limited variation was observed between the rumen microbiome composition of monensin compared to the other treatment groups, indicating that these alternatives can be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10525249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105252492023-09-28 The Effect of a Bacillus Probiotic and Essential Oils Compared to an Ionophore on the Rumen Microbiome Composition of Feedlot Cattle Linde, Dina A. Schokker, Dirkjan du Toit, Cornelius J. L. Ramkilawon, Gopika D. van Marle-Köster, Este Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Consumer preferences are demanding the removal of antibiotic growth promoters from animal diets. To meet the demand of animal protein for the growing human population, alternative feed additives, such as probiotics and essential oils, need to be investigated to increase the overall efficiency of farm animals. The microorganisms in the rumen are important to the functioning of the animal as they produce the majority of energy the animal uses for production. In this study, the effect of essential oils and a probiotic was compared to the effect of monensin, an antibiotic growth promoter, on the rumen microbiome. There were no substantial differences in the effect of the two natural feed additives compared to monensin on the microorganisms in the rumen. These feed additives hold potential as alternatives to the use of antibiotic growth promoters; large scale production studies are needed to confirm growth performance. ABSTRACT: The rising concern of antibiotic growth promoter use in livestock has necessitated the investigation into alternative feed additives. The effect of a probiotic and essential oils to an ionophore on the rumen microbiome composition of Bonsmara bulls raised under feedlot conditions was compared. Forty-eight Bonsmara weaners were allocated to four groups: a group with basal diet (CON) and three groups supplemented with monensin (MON), probiotic (PRO), and essential oils (EO). During the 120 days feeding period, rumen content was collected from four animals per group within each phase via a stomach tube for 16S rRNA and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing as well as volatile fatty acid analysis. In the starter phase, MON had a significantly lower acetate to propionate ratio and a higher Succinivibrionaceae abundance. The abundance of Lachnospiraceae was significantly higher in EO compared to MON. In the finisher phase, PRO had a significantly higher bacterial diversity. The alpha diversity did not differ between the fungal populations of the groups. The abundance of Proteobacteria was the lowest in PRO compared to the other groups. Limited variation was observed between the rumen microbiome composition of monensin compared to the other treatment groups, indicating that these alternatives can be considered. MDPI 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10525249/ /pubmed/37760327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13182927 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Linde, Dina A. Schokker, Dirkjan du Toit, Cornelius J. L. Ramkilawon, Gopika D. van Marle-Köster, Este The Effect of a Bacillus Probiotic and Essential Oils Compared to an Ionophore on the Rumen Microbiome Composition of Feedlot Cattle |
title | The Effect of a Bacillus Probiotic and Essential Oils Compared to an Ionophore on the Rumen Microbiome Composition of Feedlot Cattle |
title_full | The Effect of a Bacillus Probiotic and Essential Oils Compared to an Ionophore on the Rumen Microbiome Composition of Feedlot Cattle |
title_fullStr | The Effect of a Bacillus Probiotic and Essential Oils Compared to an Ionophore on the Rumen Microbiome Composition of Feedlot Cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of a Bacillus Probiotic and Essential Oils Compared to an Ionophore on the Rumen Microbiome Composition of Feedlot Cattle |
title_short | The Effect of a Bacillus Probiotic and Essential Oils Compared to an Ionophore on the Rumen Microbiome Composition of Feedlot Cattle |
title_sort | effect of a bacillus probiotic and essential oils compared to an ionophore on the rumen microbiome composition of feedlot cattle |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37760327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13182927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindedinaa theeffectofabacillusprobioticandessentialoilscomparedtoanionophoreontherumenmicrobiomecompositionoffeedlotcattle AT schokkerdirkjan theeffectofabacillusprobioticandessentialoilscomparedtoanionophoreontherumenmicrobiomecompositionoffeedlotcattle AT dutoitcorneliusjl theeffectofabacillusprobioticandessentialoilscomparedtoanionophoreontherumenmicrobiomecompositionoffeedlotcattle AT ramkilawongopikad theeffectofabacillusprobioticandessentialoilscomparedtoanionophoreontherumenmicrobiomecompositionoffeedlotcattle AT vanmarlekostereste theeffectofabacillusprobioticandessentialoilscomparedtoanionophoreontherumenmicrobiomecompositionoffeedlotcattle AT lindedinaa effectofabacillusprobioticandessentialoilscomparedtoanionophoreontherumenmicrobiomecompositionoffeedlotcattle AT schokkerdirkjan effectofabacillusprobioticandessentialoilscomparedtoanionophoreontherumenmicrobiomecompositionoffeedlotcattle AT dutoitcorneliusjl effectofabacillusprobioticandessentialoilscomparedtoanionophoreontherumenmicrobiomecompositionoffeedlotcattle AT ramkilawongopikad effectofabacillusprobioticandessentialoilscomparedtoanionophoreontherumenmicrobiomecompositionoffeedlotcattle AT vanmarlekostereste effectofabacillusprobioticandessentialoilscomparedtoanionophoreontherumenmicrobiomecompositionoffeedlotcattle |