Cargando…

Changing Decisions: The Interaction between Framing and Decoy Effects

Background: Cognitive biases are popular topics in psychology and marketing, as they refer to systematic cognitive tendencies in human thinking that deviate from logical and rational reasoning. The framing effect (FE) and the decoy effect (DE) are examples of cognitive biases that can influence deci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Crosta, Adolfo, Marin, Anna, Palumbo, Rocco, Ceccato, Irene, La Malva, Pasquale, Gatti, Matteo, Prete, Giulia, Palumbo, Riccardo, Mammarella, Nicola, Di Domenico, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754033
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13090755
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Cognitive biases are popular topics in psychology and marketing, as they refer to systematic cognitive tendencies in human thinking that deviate from logical and rational reasoning. The framing effect (FE) and the decoy effect (DE) are examples of cognitive biases that can influence decision making and consumer preferences. The FE involves how options are presented, while the DE involves the addition of a third option that influences the choice between the other two options. Methods: We investigated the interaction between the FE and the DE in the case of both incongruent (ID) and congruent (CD) decoys in a sample of undergraduates (n = 471). The study had a two (positive vs. negative valence) × three (original, congruent decoy, incongruent decoy) within-subject design. Results: The ID option reduces the FE in both positive- and negative-framed conditions compared to the controls, while adding the CD option increases the FE only in the positive-framed condition. Additionally, the inclusion of the CD option enhances the level of decision confidence, whereas no significant differences were found in the ID condition. Conclusions: Our findings gave new insights into the interplay between two of the most frequent cognitive biases.