Cargando…

Force-Controlled Biomechanical Simulation of Orthodontic Tooth Movement with Torque Archwires Using HOSEA (Hexapod for Orthodontic Simulation, Evaluation and Analysis)

This study aimed to investigate the dynamic behavior of different torque archwires for fixed orthodontic treatment using an automated, force-controlled biomechanical simulation system. A novel biomechanical simulation system (HOSEA) was used to simulate dynamic tooth movements and measure torque exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haas, Ellen, Schmid, Andreas, Stocker, Thomas, Wichelhaus, Andrea, Sabbagh, Hisham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37760157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091055
_version_ 1785110873453363200
author Haas, Ellen
Schmid, Andreas
Stocker, Thomas
Wichelhaus, Andrea
Sabbagh, Hisham
author_facet Haas, Ellen
Schmid, Andreas
Stocker, Thomas
Wichelhaus, Andrea
Sabbagh, Hisham
author_sort Haas, Ellen
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate the dynamic behavior of different torque archwires for fixed orthodontic treatment using an automated, force-controlled biomechanical simulation system. A novel biomechanical simulation system (HOSEA) was used to simulate dynamic tooth movements and measure torque expression of four different archwire groups: 0.017″ x 0.025″ torque segmented archwires (TSA) with 30° torque bending, 0.018″ x 0.025″ TSA with 45° torque bending, 0.017″ x 0.025″ stainless steel (SS) archwires with 30° torque bending and 0.018″ x 0.025″ SS with 30° torque bending (n = 10/group) used with 0.022″ self-ligating brackets. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used for statistical analysis (p < 0.050). The 0.018″ x 0.025″ SS archwires produced the highest initial rotational torque moment (M(y)) of −9.835 Nmm. The reduction in rotational moment per degree (M(y)/R(y)) was significantly lower for TSA compared to SS archwires (p < 0.001). TSA 0.018″ x 0.025″ was the only group in which all archwires induced a min. 10° rotation in the simulation. Collateral forces and moments, especially F(x), F(z) and M(x), occurred during torque application. The measured forces and moments were within a suitable range for the application of palatal root torque to incisors for the 0.018″ x 0.025″ archwires. The 0.018″ x 0.025″ TSA reliably achieved at least 10° incisal rotation without reactivation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10525810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105258102023-09-28 Force-Controlled Biomechanical Simulation of Orthodontic Tooth Movement with Torque Archwires Using HOSEA (Hexapod for Orthodontic Simulation, Evaluation and Analysis) Haas, Ellen Schmid, Andreas Stocker, Thomas Wichelhaus, Andrea Sabbagh, Hisham Bioengineering (Basel) Article This study aimed to investigate the dynamic behavior of different torque archwires for fixed orthodontic treatment using an automated, force-controlled biomechanical simulation system. A novel biomechanical simulation system (HOSEA) was used to simulate dynamic tooth movements and measure torque expression of four different archwire groups: 0.017″ x 0.025″ torque segmented archwires (TSA) with 30° torque bending, 0.018″ x 0.025″ TSA with 45° torque bending, 0.017″ x 0.025″ stainless steel (SS) archwires with 30° torque bending and 0.018″ x 0.025″ SS with 30° torque bending (n = 10/group) used with 0.022″ self-ligating brackets. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used for statistical analysis (p < 0.050). The 0.018″ x 0.025″ SS archwires produced the highest initial rotational torque moment (M(y)) of −9.835 Nmm. The reduction in rotational moment per degree (M(y)/R(y)) was significantly lower for TSA compared to SS archwires (p < 0.001). TSA 0.018″ x 0.025″ was the only group in which all archwires induced a min. 10° rotation in the simulation. Collateral forces and moments, especially F(x), F(z) and M(x), occurred during torque application. The measured forces and moments were within a suitable range for the application of palatal root torque to incisors for the 0.018″ x 0.025″ archwires. The 0.018″ x 0.025″ TSA reliably achieved at least 10° incisal rotation without reactivation. MDPI 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10525810/ /pubmed/37760157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091055 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Haas, Ellen
Schmid, Andreas
Stocker, Thomas
Wichelhaus, Andrea
Sabbagh, Hisham
Force-Controlled Biomechanical Simulation of Orthodontic Tooth Movement with Torque Archwires Using HOSEA (Hexapod for Orthodontic Simulation, Evaluation and Analysis)
title Force-Controlled Biomechanical Simulation of Orthodontic Tooth Movement with Torque Archwires Using HOSEA (Hexapod for Orthodontic Simulation, Evaluation and Analysis)
title_full Force-Controlled Biomechanical Simulation of Orthodontic Tooth Movement with Torque Archwires Using HOSEA (Hexapod for Orthodontic Simulation, Evaluation and Analysis)
title_fullStr Force-Controlled Biomechanical Simulation of Orthodontic Tooth Movement with Torque Archwires Using HOSEA (Hexapod for Orthodontic Simulation, Evaluation and Analysis)
title_full_unstemmed Force-Controlled Biomechanical Simulation of Orthodontic Tooth Movement with Torque Archwires Using HOSEA (Hexapod for Orthodontic Simulation, Evaluation and Analysis)
title_short Force-Controlled Biomechanical Simulation of Orthodontic Tooth Movement with Torque Archwires Using HOSEA (Hexapod for Orthodontic Simulation, Evaluation and Analysis)
title_sort force-controlled biomechanical simulation of orthodontic tooth movement with torque archwires using hosea (hexapod for orthodontic simulation, evaluation and analysis)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37760157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091055
work_keys_str_mv AT haasellen forcecontrolledbiomechanicalsimulationoforthodontictoothmovementwithtorquearchwiresusinghoseahexapodfororthodonticsimulationevaluationandanalysis
AT schmidandreas forcecontrolledbiomechanicalsimulationoforthodontictoothmovementwithtorquearchwiresusinghoseahexapodfororthodonticsimulationevaluationandanalysis
AT stockerthomas forcecontrolledbiomechanicalsimulationoforthodontictoothmovementwithtorquearchwiresusinghoseahexapodfororthodonticsimulationevaluationandanalysis
AT wichelhausandrea forcecontrolledbiomechanicalsimulationoforthodontictoothmovementwithtorquearchwiresusinghoseahexapodfororthodonticsimulationevaluationandanalysis
AT sabbaghhisham forcecontrolledbiomechanicalsimulationoforthodontictoothmovementwithtorquearchwiresusinghoseahexapodfororthodonticsimulationevaluationandanalysis