Cargando…

Evaluating Ecological Impact and Sustainability in the Manufacturing of Advanced Therapies: Comparative Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Production of ATMPs in Open and Closed Systems

The primary aim of this systematic analysis is to highlight opportunities to improve the environmental impact of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) manufacturing. We have compared the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions expressed in CO2eq of a classic clean room open system (AinB) Cell Factory ve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinnetta, Giuseppe, Adamini, Aloe, Severina, Franco, Fagioli, Franca, Zanini, Cristina, Ferrero, Ivana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37760149
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091047
_version_ 1785110903526522880
author Pinnetta, Giuseppe
Adamini, Aloe
Severina, Franco
Fagioli, Franca
Zanini, Cristina
Ferrero, Ivana
author_facet Pinnetta, Giuseppe
Adamini, Aloe
Severina, Franco
Fagioli, Franca
Zanini, Cristina
Ferrero, Ivana
author_sort Pinnetta, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description The primary aim of this systematic analysis is to highlight opportunities to improve the environmental impact of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) manufacturing. We have compared the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions expressed in CO2eq of a classic clean room open system (AinB) Cell Factory versus a comparable closed system equipped with isolators (AinD). We have therefore outlined a theoretical situation to simulate the use of a closed system with an equivalent production output to that obtained in the Cell Factory (CF) of the Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital. Open and closed systems for ATMPs have been compared as regards energy requirements, ecological footprints, and costs by analyzing a hypothetic cell production cycle of 21 days. The results demonstrate energy saving and a reduction of 52% in GHG emissions using closed systems per process cycle. Moreover, a reduction in production costs in an isolator setting is also evident. This study shows that the closed system solution has evident advantages compared with the open one.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10525939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105259392023-09-28 Evaluating Ecological Impact and Sustainability in the Manufacturing of Advanced Therapies: Comparative Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Production of ATMPs in Open and Closed Systems Pinnetta, Giuseppe Adamini, Aloe Severina, Franco Fagioli, Franca Zanini, Cristina Ferrero, Ivana Bioengineering (Basel) Article The primary aim of this systematic analysis is to highlight opportunities to improve the environmental impact of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) manufacturing. We have compared the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions expressed in CO2eq of a classic clean room open system (AinB) Cell Factory versus a comparable closed system equipped with isolators (AinD). We have therefore outlined a theoretical situation to simulate the use of a closed system with an equivalent production output to that obtained in the Cell Factory (CF) of the Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital. Open and closed systems for ATMPs have been compared as regards energy requirements, ecological footprints, and costs by analyzing a hypothetic cell production cycle of 21 days. The results demonstrate energy saving and a reduction of 52% in GHG emissions using closed systems per process cycle. Moreover, a reduction in production costs in an isolator setting is also evident. This study shows that the closed system solution has evident advantages compared with the open one. MDPI 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10525939/ /pubmed/37760149 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091047 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pinnetta, Giuseppe
Adamini, Aloe
Severina, Franco
Fagioli, Franca
Zanini, Cristina
Ferrero, Ivana
Evaluating Ecological Impact and Sustainability in the Manufacturing of Advanced Therapies: Comparative Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Production of ATMPs in Open and Closed Systems
title Evaluating Ecological Impact and Sustainability in the Manufacturing of Advanced Therapies: Comparative Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Production of ATMPs in Open and Closed Systems
title_full Evaluating Ecological Impact and Sustainability in the Manufacturing of Advanced Therapies: Comparative Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Production of ATMPs in Open and Closed Systems
title_fullStr Evaluating Ecological Impact and Sustainability in the Manufacturing of Advanced Therapies: Comparative Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Production of ATMPs in Open and Closed Systems
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Ecological Impact and Sustainability in the Manufacturing of Advanced Therapies: Comparative Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Production of ATMPs in Open and Closed Systems
title_short Evaluating Ecological Impact and Sustainability in the Manufacturing of Advanced Therapies: Comparative Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Production of ATMPs in Open and Closed Systems
title_sort evaluating ecological impact and sustainability in the manufacturing of advanced therapies: comparative analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in the production of atmps in open and closed systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37760149
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091047
work_keys_str_mv AT pinnettagiuseppe evaluatingecologicalimpactandsustainabilityinthemanufacturingofadvancedtherapiescomparativeanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsintheproductionofatmpsinopenandclosedsystems
AT adaminialoe evaluatingecologicalimpactandsustainabilityinthemanufacturingofadvancedtherapiescomparativeanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsintheproductionofatmpsinopenandclosedsystems
AT severinafranco evaluatingecologicalimpactandsustainabilityinthemanufacturingofadvancedtherapiescomparativeanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsintheproductionofatmpsinopenandclosedsystems
AT fagiolifranca evaluatingecologicalimpactandsustainabilityinthemanufacturingofadvancedtherapiescomparativeanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsintheproductionofatmpsinopenandclosedsystems
AT zaninicristina evaluatingecologicalimpactandsustainabilityinthemanufacturingofadvancedtherapiescomparativeanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsintheproductionofatmpsinopenandclosedsystems
AT ferreroivana evaluatingecologicalimpactandsustainabilityinthemanufacturingofadvancedtherapiescomparativeanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsintheproductionofatmpsinopenandclosedsystems