Cargando…

Computer-Assisted Microcatheter Shaping for Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization

Background: This study investigates the accuracy, stability, and safety of computer-assisted microcatheter shaping for intracranial aneurysm coiling. Methods: Using the solid model, a microcatheter was shaped using computer-assisted techniques or manually to investigate the accuracy and delivery of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Heng, Xu, Liquan, Li, Yanjiang, Jiang, Hanqiang, Ni, Wei, Gu, Yuxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10526415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091273
_version_ 1785111016637464576
author Yang, Heng
Xu, Liquan
Li, Yanjiang
Jiang, Hanqiang
Ni, Wei
Gu, Yuxiang
author_facet Yang, Heng
Xu, Liquan
Li, Yanjiang
Jiang, Hanqiang
Ni, Wei
Gu, Yuxiang
author_sort Yang, Heng
collection PubMed
description Background: This study investigates the accuracy, stability, and safety of computer-assisted microcatheter shaping for intracranial aneurysm coiling. Methods: Using the solid model, a microcatheter was shaped using computer-assisted techniques or manually to investigate the accuracy and delivery of microcatheter-shaping techniques in aneurysm embolization. Then, forty-eight patients were randomly assigned to the computer-assisted microcatheter-shaping (CAMS) group or the manual microcatheter-shaping (MMS) group, and the accuracy, stability, and safety of microcatheter in the patients were compared between the CAMS and MMS groups. Results: The speed of the successful microcatheter position was significantly faster in the CAMS group than in the MMS group (114.4 ± 23.99 s vs. 201.9 ± 24.54 s, p = 0.015) in vitro. In particular for inexperienced operators, the speed of the microcatheter position with the assistance of computer software is much faster than manual microcatheter shaping (93.6 ± 29.23 s vs. 228.9 ± 31.27 s, p = 0.005). In vivo, the time of the microcatheter position in the MMS group was significantly longer than that in the CAMS group (5.16 ± 0.46 min vs. 2.48 ± 0.32 min, p = 0.0001). However, the mRS score at discharge, the 6-month follow-up, and aneurysm regrowth at the 6-month follow-up were all similar between the groups. Conclusions: Computer-assisted microcatheter shaping is a novel and safe method for microcatheter shaping that introduces higher accuracy in microcatheter shaping during the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Significant: Endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms can be truly revolutionized through computer assistance, which could improve the endovascular treatment of aneurysms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10526415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105264152023-09-28 Computer-Assisted Microcatheter Shaping for Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization Yang, Heng Xu, Liquan Li, Yanjiang Jiang, Hanqiang Ni, Wei Gu, Yuxiang Brain Sci Article Background: This study investigates the accuracy, stability, and safety of computer-assisted microcatheter shaping for intracranial aneurysm coiling. Methods: Using the solid model, a microcatheter was shaped using computer-assisted techniques or manually to investigate the accuracy and delivery of microcatheter-shaping techniques in aneurysm embolization. Then, forty-eight patients were randomly assigned to the computer-assisted microcatheter-shaping (CAMS) group or the manual microcatheter-shaping (MMS) group, and the accuracy, stability, and safety of microcatheter in the patients were compared between the CAMS and MMS groups. Results: The speed of the successful microcatheter position was significantly faster in the CAMS group than in the MMS group (114.4 ± 23.99 s vs. 201.9 ± 24.54 s, p = 0.015) in vitro. In particular for inexperienced operators, the speed of the microcatheter position with the assistance of computer software is much faster than manual microcatheter shaping (93.6 ± 29.23 s vs. 228.9 ± 31.27 s, p = 0.005). In vivo, the time of the microcatheter position in the MMS group was significantly longer than that in the CAMS group (5.16 ± 0.46 min vs. 2.48 ± 0.32 min, p = 0.0001). However, the mRS score at discharge, the 6-month follow-up, and aneurysm regrowth at the 6-month follow-up were all similar between the groups. Conclusions: Computer-assisted microcatheter shaping is a novel and safe method for microcatheter shaping that introduces higher accuracy in microcatheter shaping during the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Significant: Endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms can be truly revolutionized through computer assistance, which could improve the endovascular treatment of aneurysms. MDPI 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10526415/ /pubmed/37759874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091273 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yang, Heng
Xu, Liquan
Li, Yanjiang
Jiang, Hanqiang
Ni, Wei
Gu, Yuxiang
Computer-Assisted Microcatheter Shaping for Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization
title Computer-Assisted Microcatheter Shaping for Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization
title_full Computer-Assisted Microcatheter Shaping for Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization
title_fullStr Computer-Assisted Microcatheter Shaping for Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization
title_full_unstemmed Computer-Assisted Microcatheter Shaping for Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization
title_short Computer-Assisted Microcatheter Shaping for Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization
title_sort computer-assisted microcatheter shaping for intracranial aneurysm embolization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10526415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091273
work_keys_str_mv AT yangheng computerassistedmicrocathetershapingforintracranialaneurysmembolization
AT xuliquan computerassistedmicrocathetershapingforintracranialaneurysmembolization
AT liyanjiang computerassistedmicrocathetershapingforintracranialaneurysmembolization
AT jianghanqiang computerassistedmicrocathetershapingforintracranialaneurysmembolization
AT niwei computerassistedmicrocathetershapingforintracranialaneurysmembolization
AT guyuxiang computerassistedmicrocathetershapingforintracranialaneurysmembolization