Cargando…

Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Bladder Cancer: Hype or Hope? A Systematic Review

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The diagnosis and prediction of prognosis for bladder cancer (BC) can be challenging because of the subjective nature of pathological evaluation. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising technology for improving the accuracy of BC diagnosis and prediction of prognosis....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khoraminia, Farbod, Fuster, Saul, Kanwal, Neel, Olislagers, Mitchell, Engan, Kjersti, van Leenders, Geert J. L. H., Stubbs, Andrew P., Akram, Farhan, Zuiverloon, Tahlita C. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10526515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37760487
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184518
_version_ 1785111040391905280
author Khoraminia, Farbod
Fuster, Saul
Kanwal, Neel
Olislagers, Mitchell
Engan, Kjersti
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
Stubbs, Andrew P.
Akram, Farhan
Zuiverloon, Tahlita C. M.
author_facet Khoraminia, Farbod
Fuster, Saul
Kanwal, Neel
Olislagers, Mitchell
Engan, Kjersti
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
Stubbs, Andrew P.
Akram, Farhan
Zuiverloon, Tahlita C. M.
author_sort Khoraminia, Farbod
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The diagnosis and prediction of prognosis for bladder cancer (BC) can be challenging because of the subjective nature of pathological evaluation. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising technology for improving the accuracy of BC diagnosis and prediction of prognosis. We reviewed all available studies that used AI to analyze images from BC tumor tissue that aimed to improve diagnosis or prediction of prognosis. Studies showed that specific tumor characteristics can be used to predict treatment response by analyzing BC tumor tissue images. Combining histopathological images with clinical information enables AI models to perform with high accuracy. In conclusion, AI has the potential to assist physicians in gaining more accurate diagnoses and treatment response predictions. Yet, important challenges should be addressed, such as ensuring reliability, interpretability, and performance—future research should address these caveats. ABSTRACT: Bladder cancer (BC) diagnosis and prediction of prognosis are hindered by subjective pathological evaluation, which may cause misdiagnosis and under-/over-treatment. Computational pathology (CPATH) can identify clinical outcome predictors, offering an objective approach to improve prognosis. However, a systematic review of CPATH in BC literature is lacking. Therefore, we present a comprehensive overview of studies that used CPATH in BC, analyzing 33 out of 2285 identified studies. Most studies analyzed regions of interest to distinguish normal versus tumor tissue and identify tumor grade/stage and tissue types (e.g., urothelium, stroma, and muscle). The cell’s nuclear area, shape irregularity, and roundness were the most promising markers to predict recurrence and survival based on selected regions of interest, with >80% accuracy. CPATH identified molecular subtypes by detecting features, e.g., papillary structures, hyperchromatic, and pleomorphic nuclei. Combining clinicopathological and image-derived features improved recurrence and survival prediction. However, due to the lack of outcome interpretability and independent test datasets, robustness and clinical applicability could not be ensured. The current literature demonstrates that CPATH holds the potential to improve BC diagnosis and prediction of prognosis. However, more robust, interpretable, accurate models and larger datasets—representative of clinical scenarios—are needed to address artificial intelligence’s reliability, robustness, and black box challenge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10526515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105265152023-09-28 Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Bladder Cancer: Hype or Hope? A Systematic Review Khoraminia, Farbod Fuster, Saul Kanwal, Neel Olislagers, Mitchell Engan, Kjersti van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. Stubbs, Andrew P. Akram, Farhan Zuiverloon, Tahlita C. M. Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: The diagnosis and prediction of prognosis for bladder cancer (BC) can be challenging because of the subjective nature of pathological evaluation. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising technology for improving the accuracy of BC diagnosis and prediction of prognosis. We reviewed all available studies that used AI to analyze images from BC tumor tissue that aimed to improve diagnosis or prediction of prognosis. Studies showed that specific tumor characteristics can be used to predict treatment response by analyzing BC tumor tissue images. Combining histopathological images with clinical information enables AI models to perform with high accuracy. In conclusion, AI has the potential to assist physicians in gaining more accurate diagnoses and treatment response predictions. Yet, important challenges should be addressed, such as ensuring reliability, interpretability, and performance—future research should address these caveats. ABSTRACT: Bladder cancer (BC) diagnosis and prediction of prognosis are hindered by subjective pathological evaluation, which may cause misdiagnosis and under-/over-treatment. Computational pathology (CPATH) can identify clinical outcome predictors, offering an objective approach to improve prognosis. However, a systematic review of CPATH in BC literature is lacking. Therefore, we present a comprehensive overview of studies that used CPATH in BC, analyzing 33 out of 2285 identified studies. Most studies analyzed regions of interest to distinguish normal versus tumor tissue and identify tumor grade/stage and tissue types (e.g., urothelium, stroma, and muscle). The cell’s nuclear area, shape irregularity, and roundness were the most promising markers to predict recurrence and survival based on selected regions of interest, with >80% accuracy. CPATH identified molecular subtypes by detecting features, e.g., papillary structures, hyperchromatic, and pleomorphic nuclei. Combining clinicopathological and image-derived features improved recurrence and survival prediction. However, due to the lack of outcome interpretability and independent test datasets, robustness and clinical applicability could not be ensured. The current literature demonstrates that CPATH holds the potential to improve BC diagnosis and prediction of prognosis. However, more robust, interpretable, accurate models and larger datasets—representative of clinical scenarios—are needed to address artificial intelligence’s reliability, robustness, and black box challenge. MDPI 2023-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10526515/ /pubmed/37760487 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184518 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Khoraminia, Farbod
Fuster, Saul
Kanwal, Neel
Olislagers, Mitchell
Engan, Kjersti
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
Stubbs, Andrew P.
Akram, Farhan
Zuiverloon, Tahlita C. M.
Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Bladder Cancer: Hype or Hope? A Systematic Review
title Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Bladder Cancer: Hype or Hope? A Systematic Review
title_full Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Bladder Cancer: Hype or Hope? A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Bladder Cancer: Hype or Hope? A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Bladder Cancer: Hype or Hope? A Systematic Review
title_short Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Bladder Cancer: Hype or Hope? A Systematic Review
title_sort artificial intelligence in digital pathology for bladder cancer: hype or hope? a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10526515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37760487
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184518
work_keys_str_mv AT khoraminiafarbod artificialintelligenceindigitalpathologyforbladdercancerhypeorhopeasystematicreview
AT fustersaul artificialintelligenceindigitalpathologyforbladdercancerhypeorhopeasystematicreview
AT kanwalneel artificialintelligenceindigitalpathologyforbladdercancerhypeorhopeasystematicreview
AT olislagersmitchell artificialintelligenceindigitalpathologyforbladdercancerhypeorhopeasystematicreview
AT engankjersti artificialintelligenceindigitalpathologyforbladdercancerhypeorhopeasystematicreview
AT vanleendersgeertjlh artificialintelligenceindigitalpathologyforbladdercancerhypeorhopeasystematicreview
AT stubbsandrewp artificialintelligenceindigitalpathologyforbladdercancerhypeorhopeasystematicreview
AT akramfarhan artificialintelligenceindigitalpathologyforbladdercancerhypeorhopeasystematicreview
AT zuiverloontahlitacm artificialintelligenceindigitalpathologyforbladdercancerhypeorhopeasystematicreview