Cargando…
The Role of Injectables in the Treatment and Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
SIMPLE SUMMARY: People with cancer are at an increased risk of developing blood clots. Both cancer and anti-cancer treatment are responsible for this risk. In some types of cancer, such risk is higher than in others. There are different types of blood thinners also known as anticoagulants. Blood thi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10526875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37760609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184640 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: People with cancer are at an increased risk of developing blood clots. Both cancer and anti-cancer treatment are responsible for this risk. In some types of cancer, such risk is higher than in others. There are different types of blood thinners also known as anticoagulants. Blood thinners prevent the recurrence of deep venous thrombosis (a blood clot in the limbs) or pulmonary embolism (a blood clot in the lungs) in people with cancer. In some clinical situations and, specifically, in patients with active cancer, injectable blood thinners are safer than tablets to be taken orally and work just as well. ABSTRACT: Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a leading cause of death among patients with cancer. CAT can manifest itself as venous thromboembolism (VTE), in the form of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, or arterial thromboembolism. The pathophysiology of CAT is complex and depends on cancer-, patient-, treatment- and biomarkers-related factors. Treatment of VTE in patients with cancer is complex and includes three major classes of anticoagulant agents: heparin and its derivatives, e.g., low molecular weight heparins, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and vitamin K inhibitors. Given the tremendous heterogeneity of clinical situations in patients with cancer and the challenges of CAT, there is no single universal treatment option for patients suffering from or at risk of CAT. Initial studies suggested that patients seemed to prefer an anticoagulant that would not interfere with their cancer treatment, suggesting the primacy of cancer over VTE, and favoring efficacy and safety over convenience of route of administration. Recent studies show that when the efficacy and safety aspects are similar, patients prefer the oral route of administration. Despite this, injectables are a valid option for many patients with cancer. |
---|