Cargando…
Recent Progress in Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Biosensors
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most common form of genetic variation in the human genome, are the main cause of individual differences. Furthermore, such attractive genetic markers are emerging as important hallmarks in clinical diagnosis and treatment. A variety of destructive abnormal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10527258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios13090864 |
_version_ | 1785111127962681344 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Kaimin Kong, Feizhi Zhang, Jingjing Tang, Ying Chen, Yao Chao, Long Nie, Libo Huang, Zhao |
author_facet | Wu, Kaimin Kong, Feizhi Zhang, Jingjing Tang, Ying Chen, Yao Chao, Long Nie, Libo Huang, Zhao |
author_sort | Wu, Kaimin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most common form of genetic variation in the human genome, are the main cause of individual differences. Furthermore, such attractive genetic markers are emerging as important hallmarks in clinical diagnosis and treatment. A variety of destructive abnormalities, such as malignancy, cardiovascular disease, inherited metabolic disease, and autoimmune disease, are associated with single-nucleotide variants. Therefore, identification of SNPs is necessary for better understanding of the gene function and health of an individual. SNP detection with simple preparation and operational procedures, high affinity and specificity, and cost-effectiveness have been the key challenge for years. Although biosensing methods offer high specificity and sensitivity, as well, they suffer drawbacks, such as complicated designs, complicated optimization procedures, and the use of complicated chemistry designs and expensive reagents, as well as toxic chemical compounds, for signal detection and amplifications. This review aims to provide an overview on improvements for SNP biosensing based on fluorescent and electrochemical methods. Very recently, novel designs in each category have been presented in detail. Furthermore, detection limitations, advantages and disadvantages, and challenges have also been presented for each type. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10527258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105272582023-09-28 Recent Progress in Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Biosensors Wu, Kaimin Kong, Feizhi Zhang, Jingjing Tang, Ying Chen, Yao Chao, Long Nie, Libo Huang, Zhao Biosensors (Basel) Review Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most common form of genetic variation in the human genome, are the main cause of individual differences. Furthermore, such attractive genetic markers are emerging as important hallmarks in clinical diagnosis and treatment. A variety of destructive abnormalities, such as malignancy, cardiovascular disease, inherited metabolic disease, and autoimmune disease, are associated with single-nucleotide variants. Therefore, identification of SNPs is necessary for better understanding of the gene function and health of an individual. SNP detection with simple preparation and operational procedures, high affinity and specificity, and cost-effectiveness have been the key challenge for years. Although biosensing methods offer high specificity and sensitivity, as well, they suffer drawbacks, such as complicated designs, complicated optimization procedures, and the use of complicated chemistry designs and expensive reagents, as well as toxic chemical compounds, for signal detection and amplifications. This review aims to provide an overview on improvements for SNP biosensing based on fluorescent and electrochemical methods. Very recently, novel designs in each category have been presented in detail. Furthermore, detection limitations, advantages and disadvantages, and challenges have also been presented for each type. MDPI 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10527258/ /pubmed/37754098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios13090864 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Wu, Kaimin Kong, Feizhi Zhang, Jingjing Tang, Ying Chen, Yao Chao, Long Nie, Libo Huang, Zhao Recent Progress in Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Biosensors |
title | Recent Progress in Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Biosensors |
title_full | Recent Progress in Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Biosensors |
title_fullStr | Recent Progress in Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Biosensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Recent Progress in Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Biosensors |
title_short | Recent Progress in Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Biosensors |
title_sort | recent progress in single-nucleotide polymorphism biosensors |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10527258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios13090864 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wukaimin recentprogressinsinglenucleotidepolymorphismbiosensors AT kongfeizhi recentprogressinsinglenucleotidepolymorphismbiosensors AT zhangjingjing recentprogressinsinglenucleotidepolymorphismbiosensors AT tangying recentprogressinsinglenucleotidepolymorphismbiosensors AT chenyao recentprogressinsinglenucleotidepolymorphismbiosensors AT chaolong recentprogressinsinglenucleotidepolymorphismbiosensors AT nielibo recentprogressinsinglenucleotidepolymorphismbiosensors AT huangzhao recentprogressinsinglenucleotidepolymorphismbiosensors |