Cargando…
The Value of Ultrasonic Elastography in Detecting Placental Stiffness for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia: A Meta-Analysis
This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic value of ultrasonic elastography in detecting placental stiffness in the diagnosis of preeclampsia (PE). A systematic search was conducted in the EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus database, and PubMed databases to identify studies published...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10527587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13182894 |
_version_ | 1785111163343732736 |
---|---|
author | Su, Shanshan Huang, Yanyan Luo, Weiwen Li, Shaohui |
author_facet | Su, Shanshan Huang, Yanyan Luo, Weiwen Li, Shaohui |
author_sort | Su, Shanshan |
collection | PubMed |
description | This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic value of ultrasonic elastography in detecting placental stiffness in the diagnosis of preeclampsia (PE). A systematic search was conducted in the EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus database, and PubMed databases to identify studies published before June 2023 using ultrasonic elastography to diagnose PE. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of ultrasonic elastography for diagnosing PE were calculated, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve model was constructed. The degree of heterogeneity was estimated using the I(2) statistic, and a meta-regression analysis was performed to explore its sources. A protocol was determined previously (PROSPERO: CRD42023443646). We included 1188 participants from 11 studies, including 190 patients with PE and 998 patients without PE as controls. Overall sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonic elastography in detecting placental stiffness for the diagnosis of PE were 89% (95% CI: 85–93) and 74% (95% CI: 51–89), respectively. The I(2) values for sensitivity and specificity were 59% (95% CI: 29–89) and 96% (95% CI: 95–98), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.92). The meta-regression analysis showed no significant heterogeneity. Ultrasonic elastography exhibits good diagnostic accuracy for detecting placental stiffness and can serve as a non-invasive tool for differentially diagnosing PE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10527587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105275872023-09-28 The Value of Ultrasonic Elastography in Detecting Placental Stiffness for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia: A Meta-Analysis Su, Shanshan Huang, Yanyan Luo, Weiwen Li, Shaohui Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic value of ultrasonic elastography in detecting placental stiffness in the diagnosis of preeclampsia (PE). A systematic search was conducted in the EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus database, and PubMed databases to identify studies published before June 2023 using ultrasonic elastography to diagnose PE. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of ultrasonic elastography for diagnosing PE were calculated, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve model was constructed. The degree of heterogeneity was estimated using the I(2) statistic, and a meta-regression analysis was performed to explore its sources. A protocol was determined previously (PROSPERO: CRD42023443646). We included 1188 participants from 11 studies, including 190 patients with PE and 998 patients without PE as controls. Overall sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonic elastography in detecting placental stiffness for the diagnosis of PE were 89% (95% CI: 85–93) and 74% (95% CI: 51–89), respectively. The I(2) values for sensitivity and specificity were 59% (95% CI: 29–89) and 96% (95% CI: 95–98), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.92). The meta-regression analysis showed no significant heterogeneity. Ultrasonic elastography exhibits good diagnostic accuracy for detecting placental stiffness and can serve as a non-invasive tool for differentially diagnosing PE. MDPI 2023-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10527587/ /pubmed/37761261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13182894 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Su, Shanshan Huang, Yanyan Luo, Weiwen Li, Shaohui The Value of Ultrasonic Elastography in Detecting Placental Stiffness for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia: A Meta-Analysis |
title | The Value of Ultrasonic Elastography in Detecting Placental Stiffness for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Value of Ultrasonic Elastography in Detecting Placental Stiffness for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Value of Ultrasonic Elastography in Detecting Placental Stiffness for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Value of Ultrasonic Elastography in Detecting Placental Stiffness for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Value of Ultrasonic Elastography in Detecting Placental Stiffness for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | value of ultrasonic elastography in detecting placental stiffness for the diagnosis of preeclampsia: a meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10527587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13182894 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sushanshan thevalueofultrasonicelastographyindetectingplacentalstiffnessforthediagnosisofpreeclampsiaametaanalysis AT huangyanyan thevalueofultrasonicelastographyindetectingplacentalstiffnessforthediagnosisofpreeclampsiaametaanalysis AT luoweiwen thevalueofultrasonicelastographyindetectingplacentalstiffnessforthediagnosisofpreeclampsiaametaanalysis AT lishaohui thevalueofultrasonicelastographyindetectingplacentalstiffnessforthediagnosisofpreeclampsiaametaanalysis AT sushanshan valueofultrasonicelastographyindetectingplacentalstiffnessforthediagnosisofpreeclampsiaametaanalysis AT huangyanyan valueofultrasonicelastographyindetectingplacentalstiffnessforthediagnosisofpreeclampsiaametaanalysis AT luoweiwen valueofultrasonicelastographyindetectingplacentalstiffnessforthediagnosisofpreeclampsiaametaanalysis AT lishaohui valueofultrasonicelastographyindetectingplacentalstiffnessforthediagnosisofpreeclampsiaametaanalysis |