Cargando…

COVID-lateral Damage: Impact of the Post-COVID-19 Era on Procedural Training in Emergency Medicine Residency

INTRODUCTION: Hospitalizations during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic peaked in New York in March–April 2020. In the months following, emergency department (ED) volumes declined. Our objective in this study was to examine the effect of this decline on the procedural experience of emergency...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frank, Daniel, Perera, Thomas, Weizberg, Moshe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10527848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37788025
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.59771
_version_ 1785111199742951424
author Frank, Daniel
Perera, Thomas
Weizberg, Moshe
author_facet Frank, Daniel
Perera, Thomas
Weizberg, Moshe
author_sort Frank, Daniel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hospitalizations during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic peaked in New York in March–April 2020. In the months following, emergency department (ED) volumes declined. Our objective in this study was to examine the effect of this decline on the procedural experience of emergency medicine (EM) residents compared to the pre-pandemic period. METHODS: We conducted this multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients seen and key procedures performed by EM residents at hospitals spanning three Accreditation Committee for Graduate Medical Education-approved EM residencies in New York City and Nassau County, NY. We obtained numbers of procedures performed during May–July 2020 and compared them to the same time period for 2019 and 2018. We a priori classified critical care procedures—cardioversion, central lines, chest tubes, procedural sedation, and endotracheal intubation. We also studied “fast-track” procedures—fracture/joint reduction, incision and drainage (I&D), laceration repairs, and splints. RESULTS: Total number of critical care procedures in the months following the COVID-19 peak decreased from 694 to 606 (−12.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.3–15.4%), compared to an increase from 642 to 694 (+8.1%, 95% CI 6.1–10.5%) the previous year (difference −9.3%). Total number of fast-track procedures decreased from 5,253 to 3,369 (−35.9%, 95% CI 34.6–37.2%), compared to a decrease from 5,333 to 5,253 (−1.5%, 95% CI 1.2–1.9%) the year before (difference −36.3%). Specific critical care procedures performed in 2020 compared to the mean of 2019 and 2018 as follows: cardioversion −33.3%; central lines +19.0%; chest tubes −27.9%; procedural sedation −30.8%; endotracheal intubation −13.8%. Specific fast-track procedures: reductions +33.3%; I&D −48.6%; laceration repair −17.3%; and splint application −49.8%. CONCLUSION: Emergency medicine residents’ critical and fast-track procedural experience at five hospitals was reduced during the months following the COVID-19 peak in comparison to a similar period in the two years prior. Training programs may consider increasing simulation-lab and cadaver-lab experiences, as well as ED and critical care rotations for their residents to offset this trend.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10527848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105278482023-09-28 COVID-lateral Damage: Impact of the Post-COVID-19 Era on Procedural Training in Emergency Medicine Residency Frank, Daniel Perera, Thomas Weizberg, Moshe West J Emerg Med Education INTRODUCTION: Hospitalizations during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic peaked in New York in March–April 2020. In the months following, emergency department (ED) volumes declined. Our objective in this study was to examine the effect of this decline on the procedural experience of emergency medicine (EM) residents compared to the pre-pandemic period. METHODS: We conducted this multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients seen and key procedures performed by EM residents at hospitals spanning three Accreditation Committee for Graduate Medical Education-approved EM residencies in New York City and Nassau County, NY. We obtained numbers of procedures performed during May–July 2020 and compared them to the same time period for 2019 and 2018. We a priori classified critical care procedures—cardioversion, central lines, chest tubes, procedural sedation, and endotracheal intubation. We also studied “fast-track” procedures—fracture/joint reduction, incision and drainage (I&D), laceration repairs, and splints. RESULTS: Total number of critical care procedures in the months following the COVID-19 peak decreased from 694 to 606 (−12.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.3–15.4%), compared to an increase from 642 to 694 (+8.1%, 95% CI 6.1–10.5%) the previous year (difference −9.3%). Total number of fast-track procedures decreased from 5,253 to 3,369 (−35.9%, 95% CI 34.6–37.2%), compared to a decrease from 5,333 to 5,253 (−1.5%, 95% CI 1.2–1.9%) the year before (difference −36.3%). Specific critical care procedures performed in 2020 compared to the mean of 2019 and 2018 as follows: cardioversion −33.3%; central lines +19.0%; chest tubes −27.9%; procedural sedation −30.8%; endotracheal intubation −13.8%. Specific fast-track procedures: reductions +33.3%; I&D −48.6%; laceration repair −17.3%; and splint application −49.8%. CONCLUSION: Emergency medicine residents’ critical and fast-track procedural experience at five hospitals was reduced during the months following the COVID-19 peak in comparison to a similar period in the two years prior. Training programs may consider increasing simulation-lab and cadaver-lab experiences, as well as ED and critical care rotations for their residents to offset this trend. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2023-09 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10527848/ /pubmed/37788025 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.59771 Text en © 2023 Frank et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Education
Frank, Daniel
Perera, Thomas
Weizberg, Moshe
COVID-lateral Damage: Impact of the Post-COVID-19 Era on Procedural Training in Emergency Medicine Residency
title COVID-lateral Damage: Impact of the Post-COVID-19 Era on Procedural Training in Emergency Medicine Residency
title_full COVID-lateral Damage: Impact of the Post-COVID-19 Era on Procedural Training in Emergency Medicine Residency
title_fullStr COVID-lateral Damage: Impact of the Post-COVID-19 Era on Procedural Training in Emergency Medicine Residency
title_full_unstemmed COVID-lateral Damage: Impact of the Post-COVID-19 Era on Procedural Training in Emergency Medicine Residency
title_short COVID-lateral Damage: Impact of the Post-COVID-19 Era on Procedural Training in Emergency Medicine Residency
title_sort covid-lateral damage: impact of the post-covid-19 era on procedural training in emergency medicine residency
topic Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10527848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37788025
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.59771
work_keys_str_mv AT frankdaniel covidlateraldamageimpactofthepostcovid19eraonproceduraltraininginemergencymedicineresidency
AT pererathomas covidlateraldamageimpactofthepostcovid19eraonproceduraltraininginemergencymedicineresidency
AT weizbergmoshe covidlateraldamageimpactofthepostcovid19eraonproceduraltraininginemergencymedicineresidency