Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer

Background: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies. Because the findings mentioned in radiogram interpretation reports issued by diagnostic radiologists influence treatment strategies, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative computed tomography (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashimoto, Chiaki, Shigeta, Shogo, Shimada, Muneaki, Shibuya, Yusuke, Ishibashi, Masumi, Kageyama, Sakiko, Sato, Tomomi, Tokunaga, Hideki, Takase, Kei, Yaegashi, Nobuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10527880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090597
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies. Because the findings mentioned in radiogram interpretation reports issued by diagnostic radiologists influence treatment strategies, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation results in clinically relevant settings. Methods: The clinical records of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer treated at Tohoku University Hospital from January 2012 to December 2021 were reviewed. The preoperative and pathologically estimated cancer stages were compared based on the results mentioned in the radiogram interpretation report. Results: The preoperative and postoperative cancer stages were concordant in 70.0% of the patients. By contrast, the cancer stage was underdiagnosed and overdiagnosed in 21.7% and 8.2% of the patients, respectively. The sensitivities of MRI for deep myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, vaginal invasion, and adnexal metastasis were 65.1%, 58.2%, 33.3%, and 18.4%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for pelvic lymph node metastasis using a combination of CT and MRI were 40.9% and 98.4%, respectively. Those for para-aortic lymph node metastases using CT were 37.0% and 99.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The low sensitivity observed in this study clarified the limitations of preoperative diagnostic performance in current clinical practice.