Cargando…
Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer
Background: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies. Because the findings mentioned in radiogram interpretation reports issued by diagnostic radiologists influence treatment strategies, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative computed tomography (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10527880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090597 |
_version_ | 1785111203963469824 |
---|---|
author | Hashimoto, Chiaki Shigeta, Shogo Shimada, Muneaki Shibuya, Yusuke Ishibashi, Masumi Kageyama, Sakiko Sato, Tomomi Tokunaga, Hideki Takase, Kei Yaegashi, Nobuo |
author_facet | Hashimoto, Chiaki Shigeta, Shogo Shimada, Muneaki Shibuya, Yusuke Ishibashi, Masumi Kageyama, Sakiko Sato, Tomomi Tokunaga, Hideki Takase, Kei Yaegashi, Nobuo |
author_sort | Hashimoto, Chiaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies. Because the findings mentioned in radiogram interpretation reports issued by diagnostic radiologists influence treatment strategies, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation results in clinically relevant settings. Methods: The clinical records of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer treated at Tohoku University Hospital from January 2012 to December 2021 were reviewed. The preoperative and pathologically estimated cancer stages were compared based on the results mentioned in the radiogram interpretation report. Results: The preoperative and postoperative cancer stages were concordant in 70.0% of the patients. By contrast, the cancer stage was underdiagnosed and overdiagnosed in 21.7% and 8.2% of the patients, respectively. The sensitivities of MRI for deep myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, vaginal invasion, and adnexal metastasis were 65.1%, 58.2%, 33.3%, and 18.4%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for pelvic lymph node metastasis using a combination of CT and MRI were 40.9% and 98.4%, respectively. Those for para-aortic lymph node metastases using CT were 37.0% and 99.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The low sensitivity observed in this study clarified the limitations of preoperative diagnostic performance in current clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10527880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105278802023-09-28 Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer Hashimoto, Chiaki Shigeta, Shogo Shimada, Muneaki Shibuya, Yusuke Ishibashi, Masumi Kageyama, Sakiko Sato, Tomomi Tokunaga, Hideki Takase, Kei Yaegashi, Nobuo Curr Oncol Article Background: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies. Because the findings mentioned in radiogram interpretation reports issued by diagnostic radiologists influence treatment strategies, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation results in clinically relevant settings. Methods: The clinical records of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer treated at Tohoku University Hospital from January 2012 to December 2021 were reviewed. The preoperative and pathologically estimated cancer stages were compared based on the results mentioned in the radiogram interpretation report. Results: The preoperative and postoperative cancer stages were concordant in 70.0% of the patients. By contrast, the cancer stage was underdiagnosed and overdiagnosed in 21.7% and 8.2% of the patients, respectively. The sensitivities of MRI for deep myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, vaginal invasion, and adnexal metastasis were 65.1%, 58.2%, 33.3%, and 18.4%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for pelvic lymph node metastasis using a combination of CT and MRI were 40.9% and 98.4%, respectively. Those for para-aortic lymph node metastases using CT were 37.0% and 99.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The low sensitivity observed in this study clarified the limitations of preoperative diagnostic performance in current clinical practice. MDPI 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10527880/ /pubmed/37754512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090597 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hashimoto, Chiaki Shigeta, Shogo Shimada, Muneaki Shibuya, Yusuke Ishibashi, Masumi Kageyama, Sakiko Sato, Tomomi Tokunaga, Hideki Takase, Kei Yaegashi, Nobuo Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer |
title | Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer |
title_full | Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer |
title_short | Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of preoperative imaging in endometrial cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10527880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hashimotochiaki diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer AT shigetashogo diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer AT shimadamuneaki diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer AT shibuyayusuke diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer AT ishibashimasumi diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer AT kageyamasakiko diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer AT satotomomi diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer AT tokunagahideki diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer AT takasekei diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer AT yaegashinobuo diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer |