Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer

Background: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies. Because the findings mentioned in radiogram interpretation reports issued by diagnostic radiologists influence treatment strategies, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative computed tomography (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashimoto, Chiaki, Shigeta, Shogo, Shimada, Muneaki, Shibuya, Yusuke, Ishibashi, Masumi, Kageyama, Sakiko, Sato, Tomomi, Tokunaga, Hideki, Takase, Kei, Yaegashi, Nobuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10527880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090597
_version_ 1785111203963469824
author Hashimoto, Chiaki
Shigeta, Shogo
Shimada, Muneaki
Shibuya, Yusuke
Ishibashi, Masumi
Kageyama, Sakiko
Sato, Tomomi
Tokunaga, Hideki
Takase, Kei
Yaegashi, Nobuo
author_facet Hashimoto, Chiaki
Shigeta, Shogo
Shimada, Muneaki
Shibuya, Yusuke
Ishibashi, Masumi
Kageyama, Sakiko
Sato, Tomomi
Tokunaga, Hideki
Takase, Kei
Yaegashi, Nobuo
author_sort Hashimoto, Chiaki
collection PubMed
description Background: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies. Because the findings mentioned in radiogram interpretation reports issued by diagnostic radiologists influence treatment strategies, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation results in clinically relevant settings. Methods: The clinical records of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer treated at Tohoku University Hospital from January 2012 to December 2021 were reviewed. The preoperative and pathologically estimated cancer stages were compared based on the results mentioned in the radiogram interpretation report. Results: The preoperative and postoperative cancer stages were concordant in 70.0% of the patients. By contrast, the cancer stage was underdiagnosed and overdiagnosed in 21.7% and 8.2% of the patients, respectively. The sensitivities of MRI for deep myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, vaginal invasion, and adnexal metastasis were 65.1%, 58.2%, 33.3%, and 18.4%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for pelvic lymph node metastasis using a combination of CT and MRI were 40.9% and 98.4%, respectively. Those for para-aortic lymph node metastases using CT were 37.0% and 99.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The low sensitivity observed in this study clarified the limitations of preoperative diagnostic performance in current clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10527880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105278802023-09-28 Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer Hashimoto, Chiaki Shigeta, Shogo Shimada, Muneaki Shibuya, Yusuke Ishibashi, Masumi Kageyama, Sakiko Sato, Tomomi Tokunaga, Hideki Takase, Kei Yaegashi, Nobuo Curr Oncol Article Background: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies. Because the findings mentioned in radiogram interpretation reports issued by diagnostic radiologists influence treatment strategies, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation results in clinically relevant settings. Methods: The clinical records of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer treated at Tohoku University Hospital from January 2012 to December 2021 were reviewed. The preoperative and pathologically estimated cancer stages were compared based on the results mentioned in the radiogram interpretation report. Results: The preoperative and postoperative cancer stages were concordant in 70.0% of the patients. By contrast, the cancer stage was underdiagnosed and overdiagnosed in 21.7% and 8.2% of the patients, respectively. The sensitivities of MRI for deep myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, vaginal invasion, and adnexal metastasis were 65.1%, 58.2%, 33.3%, and 18.4%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for pelvic lymph node metastasis using a combination of CT and MRI were 40.9% and 98.4%, respectively. Those for para-aortic lymph node metastases using CT were 37.0% and 99.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The low sensitivity observed in this study clarified the limitations of preoperative diagnostic performance in current clinical practice. MDPI 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10527880/ /pubmed/37754512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090597 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hashimoto, Chiaki
Shigeta, Shogo
Shimada, Muneaki
Shibuya, Yusuke
Ishibashi, Masumi
Kageyama, Sakiko
Sato, Tomomi
Tokunaga, Hideki
Takase, Kei
Yaegashi, Nobuo
Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer
title Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer
title_full Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer
title_short Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial Cancer
title_sort diagnostic performance of preoperative imaging in endometrial cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10527880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090597
work_keys_str_mv AT hashimotochiaki diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer
AT shigetashogo diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer
AT shimadamuneaki diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer
AT shibuyayusuke diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer
AT ishibashimasumi diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer
AT kageyamasakiko diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer
AT satotomomi diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer
AT tokunagahideki diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer
AT takasekei diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer
AT yaegashinobuo diagnosticperformanceofpreoperativeimaginginendometrialcancer