Cargando…

Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mistletoe extract (ME) use during the oncological perioperative period. Methods: Details registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: Seven RCTs (comprising 663 participants in nine reports) and three nonrandomized studies were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cogo, Elise, Elsayed, Mohamed, Bhardwaj, Sukriti, Cooley, Kieran, Aycho, Christilynn, Liang, Vivian, Papadogianis, Peter, Psihogios, Athanasios, Seely, Dugald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10529072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754510
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090595
_version_ 1785111344549199872
author Cogo, Elise
Elsayed, Mohamed
Bhardwaj, Sukriti
Cooley, Kieran
Aycho, Christilynn
Liang, Vivian
Papadogianis, Peter
Psihogios, Athanasios
Seely, Dugald
author_facet Cogo, Elise
Elsayed, Mohamed
Bhardwaj, Sukriti
Cooley, Kieran
Aycho, Christilynn
Liang, Vivian
Papadogianis, Peter
Psihogios, Athanasios
Seely, Dugald
author_sort Cogo, Elise
collection PubMed
description Background: We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mistletoe extract (ME) use during the oncological perioperative period. Methods: Details registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: Seven RCTs (comprising 663 participants in nine reports) and three nonrandomized studies were included. In five RCTs, ME was evaluated as adjunctive care and the control group had no additional intervention, whereas in two RCTs, ME was compared head-to-head against common cancer treatments (i.e., etoposide or bacillus Calmette-Guérin) with the intervention groups not receiving standard care. Meta-analyses found no evidence for a difference between ME and no added therapy for mortality and recurrence (RR, 95% CI: 1.00, 0.79–1.27; and 1.03, 0.79–1.33, respectively). Two RCTs reported beneficial effects of ME on immune cells, specifically natural killer cells, in colorectal cancer, and one RCT reported quality of life improvement. Two RCTs reported ME discontinuations due to adverse events and grade 3/4 toxicities. Nevertheless, no safety signals were detected from these 10 studies. Quality appraisal revealed a substantial risk of bias. Conclusions: Preliminary data are encouraging for mistletoe extracts, particularly in the context of colorectal cancer. However, the evidence is limited by the number of studies, an evaluation of different outcomes, and methodological limitations. Further high-quality research is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10529072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105290722023-09-28 Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials Cogo, Elise Elsayed, Mohamed Bhardwaj, Sukriti Cooley, Kieran Aycho, Christilynn Liang, Vivian Papadogianis, Peter Psihogios, Athanasios Seely, Dugald Curr Oncol Systematic Review Background: We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mistletoe extract (ME) use during the oncological perioperative period. Methods: Details registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: Seven RCTs (comprising 663 participants in nine reports) and three nonrandomized studies were included. In five RCTs, ME was evaluated as adjunctive care and the control group had no additional intervention, whereas in two RCTs, ME was compared head-to-head against common cancer treatments (i.e., etoposide or bacillus Calmette-Guérin) with the intervention groups not receiving standard care. Meta-analyses found no evidence for a difference between ME and no added therapy for mortality and recurrence (RR, 95% CI: 1.00, 0.79–1.27; and 1.03, 0.79–1.33, respectively). Two RCTs reported beneficial effects of ME on immune cells, specifically natural killer cells, in colorectal cancer, and one RCT reported quality of life improvement. Two RCTs reported ME discontinuations due to adverse events and grade 3/4 toxicities. Nevertheless, no safety signals were detected from these 10 studies. Quality appraisal revealed a substantial risk of bias. Conclusions: Preliminary data are encouraging for mistletoe extracts, particularly in the context of colorectal cancer. However, the evidence is limited by the number of studies, an evaluation of different outcomes, and methodological limitations. Further high-quality research is warranted. MDPI 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10529072/ /pubmed/37754510 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090595 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Cogo, Elise
Elsayed, Mohamed
Bhardwaj, Sukriti
Cooley, Kieran
Aycho, Christilynn
Liang, Vivian
Papadogianis, Peter
Psihogios, Athanasios
Seely, Dugald
Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials
title Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort mistletoe extracts during the oncological perioperative period: a systematic review and meta-analysis of human randomized controlled trials
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10529072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754510
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090595
work_keys_str_mv AT cogoelise mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT elsayedmohamed mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT bhardwajsukriti mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT cooleykieran mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT aychochristilynn mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liangvivian mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT papadogianispeter mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT psihogiosathanasios mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT seelydugald mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials