Cargando…
Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mistletoe extract (ME) use during the oncological perioperative period. Methods: Details registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: Seven RCTs (comprising 663 participants in nine reports) and three nonrandomized studies were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10529072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754510 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090595 |
_version_ | 1785111344549199872 |
---|---|
author | Cogo, Elise Elsayed, Mohamed Bhardwaj, Sukriti Cooley, Kieran Aycho, Christilynn Liang, Vivian Papadogianis, Peter Psihogios, Athanasios Seely, Dugald |
author_facet | Cogo, Elise Elsayed, Mohamed Bhardwaj, Sukriti Cooley, Kieran Aycho, Christilynn Liang, Vivian Papadogianis, Peter Psihogios, Athanasios Seely, Dugald |
author_sort | Cogo, Elise |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mistletoe extract (ME) use during the oncological perioperative period. Methods: Details registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: Seven RCTs (comprising 663 participants in nine reports) and three nonrandomized studies were included. In five RCTs, ME was evaluated as adjunctive care and the control group had no additional intervention, whereas in two RCTs, ME was compared head-to-head against common cancer treatments (i.e., etoposide or bacillus Calmette-Guérin) with the intervention groups not receiving standard care. Meta-analyses found no evidence for a difference between ME and no added therapy for mortality and recurrence (RR, 95% CI: 1.00, 0.79–1.27; and 1.03, 0.79–1.33, respectively). Two RCTs reported beneficial effects of ME on immune cells, specifically natural killer cells, in colorectal cancer, and one RCT reported quality of life improvement. Two RCTs reported ME discontinuations due to adverse events and grade 3/4 toxicities. Nevertheless, no safety signals were detected from these 10 studies. Quality appraisal revealed a substantial risk of bias. Conclusions: Preliminary data are encouraging for mistletoe extracts, particularly in the context of colorectal cancer. However, the evidence is limited by the number of studies, an evaluation of different outcomes, and methodological limitations. Further high-quality research is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10529072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105290722023-09-28 Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials Cogo, Elise Elsayed, Mohamed Bhardwaj, Sukriti Cooley, Kieran Aycho, Christilynn Liang, Vivian Papadogianis, Peter Psihogios, Athanasios Seely, Dugald Curr Oncol Systematic Review Background: We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mistletoe extract (ME) use during the oncological perioperative period. Methods: Details registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: Seven RCTs (comprising 663 participants in nine reports) and three nonrandomized studies were included. In five RCTs, ME was evaluated as adjunctive care and the control group had no additional intervention, whereas in two RCTs, ME was compared head-to-head against common cancer treatments (i.e., etoposide or bacillus Calmette-Guérin) with the intervention groups not receiving standard care. Meta-analyses found no evidence for a difference between ME and no added therapy for mortality and recurrence (RR, 95% CI: 1.00, 0.79–1.27; and 1.03, 0.79–1.33, respectively). Two RCTs reported beneficial effects of ME on immune cells, specifically natural killer cells, in colorectal cancer, and one RCT reported quality of life improvement. Two RCTs reported ME discontinuations due to adverse events and grade 3/4 toxicities. Nevertheless, no safety signals were detected from these 10 studies. Quality appraisal revealed a substantial risk of bias. Conclusions: Preliminary data are encouraging for mistletoe extracts, particularly in the context of colorectal cancer. However, the evidence is limited by the number of studies, an evaluation of different outcomes, and methodological limitations. Further high-quality research is warranted. MDPI 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10529072/ /pubmed/37754510 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090595 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Cogo, Elise Elsayed, Mohamed Bhardwaj, Sukriti Cooley, Kieran Aycho, Christilynn Liang, Vivian Papadogianis, Peter Psihogios, Athanasios Seely, Dugald Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | mistletoe extracts during the oncological perioperative period: a systematic review and meta-analysis of human randomized controlled trials |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10529072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754510 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30090595 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cogoelise mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT elsayedmohamed mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bhardwajsukriti mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT cooleykieran mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT aychochristilynn mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liangvivian mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT papadogianispeter mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT psihogiosathanasios mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT seelydugald mistletoeextractsduringtheoncologicalperioperativeperiodasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanrandomizedcontrolledtrials |