Cargando…

Success of Xenografts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Based on Histomorphometric Outcomes

Different xenograft approaches in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) are essential to understand relative to their histomorphometric outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study involved studying biomaterials of a xenograft nature that are used in ARP procedures, to compare the different approaches and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Rabia S., Aslam, Mohsin, Ucer, Cemal, Wright, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10529255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11090215
_version_ 1785111365731483648
author Khan, Rabia S.
Aslam, Mohsin
Ucer, Cemal
Wright, Simon
author_facet Khan, Rabia S.
Aslam, Mohsin
Ucer, Cemal
Wright, Simon
author_sort Khan, Rabia S.
collection PubMed
description Different xenograft approaches in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) are essential to understand relative to their histomorphometric outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study involved studying biomaterials of a xenograft nature that are used in ARP procedures, to compare the different approaches and evaluate their efficacy in relation to histomorphometric data. An electronic search was completed using the databases: Ovid (Medline), Google Scholar and Wiley Online Library, including a hand search for relevant articles and grey literature. Only randomised controlled trials, using xenograft biomaterials for alveolar ridge preservation procedures involving human studies, dated from 2010–2022 were included in the review. An initial search yielded 4918 articles, after application of the eligibility criteria, 18 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. The two main xenograft groups found were of bovine origin and of porcine origin. The main histomorphometric outcomes evaluated included new bone percentage (N.B%) and residual graft percentage (R.G%). The mean N.B% for the bovine and porcine groups were 33.46% and 39.63% respectively and the mean R.G% for the bovine and porcine groups were 19.40% and 18.63% respectively. The current evidence suggests that the two main xenograft biomaterials used in ARP procedures after tooth extraction, which are of bovine and porcine origin, displayed effectiveness in producing new bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10529255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105292552023-09-28 Success of Xenografts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Based on Histomorphometric Outcomes Khan, Rabia S. Aslam, Mohsin Ucer, Cemal Wright, Simon Dent J (Basel) Systematic Review Different xenograft approaches in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) are essential to understand relative to their histomorphometric outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study involved studying biomaterials of a xenograft nature that are used in ARP procedures, to compare the different approaches and evaluate their efficacy in relation to histomorphometric data. An electronic search was completed using the databases: Ovid (Medline), Google Scholar and Wiley Online Library, including a hand search for relevant articles and grey literature. Only randomised controlled trials, using xenograft biomaterials for alveolar ridge preservation procedures involving human studies, dated from 2010–2022 were included in the review. An initial search yielded 4918 articles, after application of the eligibility criteria, 18 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. The two main xenograft groups found were of bovine origin and of porcine origin. The main histomorphometric outcomes evaluated included new bone percentage (N.B%) and residual graft percentage (R.G%). The mean N.B% for the bovine and porcine groups were 33.46% and 39.63% respectively and the mean R.G% for the bovine and porcine groups were 19.40% and 18.63% respectively. The current evidence suggests that the two main xenograft biomaterials used in ARP procedures after tooth extraction, which are of bovine and porcine origin, displayed effectiveness in producing new bone. MDPI 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10529255/ /pubmed/37754335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11090215 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Khan, Rabia S.
Aslam, Mohsin
Ucer, Cemal
Wright, Simon
Success of Xenografts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Based on Histomorphometric Outcomes
title Success of Xenografts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Based on Histomorphometric Outcomes
title_full Success of Xenografts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Based on Histomorphometric Outcomes
title_fullStr Success of Xenografts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Based on Histomorphometric Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Success of Xenografts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Based on Histomorphometric Outcomes
title_short Success of Xenografts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Based on Histomorphometric Outcomes
title_sort success of xenografts in alveolar ridge preservation based on histomorphometric outcomes
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10529255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11090215
work_keys_str_mv AT khanrabias successofxenograftsinalveolarridgepreservationbasedonhistomorphometricoutcomes
AT aslammohsin successofxenograftsinalveolarridgepreservationbasedonhistomorphometricoutcomes
AT ucercemal successofxenograftsinalveolarridgepreservationbasedonhistomorphometricoutcomes
AT wrightsimon successofxenograftsinalveolarridgepreservationbasedonhistomorphometricoutcomes