Cargando…

Assessing the size and growth of the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation industry

Interest has focused on quantifying the size and scope of environmental markets, particularly those that offset ecosystem impacts or restore natural infrastructure to improve habitat or promote clean air and water. In this paper, we focus on the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation market,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: BenDor, Todd K., Kwon, Joungwon, Lester, T. William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10529541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37756326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285139
_version_ 1785111399888846848
author BenDor, Todd K.
Kwon, Joungwon
Lester, T. William
author_facet BenDor, Todd K.
Kwon, Joungwon
Lester, T. William
author_sort BenDor, Todd K.
collection PubMed
description Interest has focused on quantifying the size and scope of environmental markets, particularly those that offset ecosystem impacts or restore natural infrastructure to improve habitat or promote clean air and water. In this paper, we focus on the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation market, asking: what types of firms make up the mitigation “industry”? What are the economic impacts–i.e., the “size”–of the mitigation industry? How has this industry changed over time? We present the results of a national survey of mitigation firms and construct an input-output model of the industry’s economic impacts and employment. We also develop a comparative, 2014 model of the industry using data from a previous study of the broader, ecological restoration economy. Our findings suggest that the (2019, pre-COVID) mitigation industry collects annual revenues (direct economic impacts) in excess of $3.5 billion, which, along with additional indirect (supply chain) and induced (spillover) economic impacts, combine to over $9.6 billion in total output and support over 53,000 total jobs. We estimate 2014–2019 growth of ~35.2 percent in revenues, ~32.6 percent in total economic impacts, and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.25%. This places the mitigation industry within the range of other, well-established industries within the technical services sector. We suggest establishing North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes specifically for ecological restoration and mitigation firms, an essential step in generating accurate and consistent employment estimates in the future, particularly at sub-national geographic scales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10529541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105295412023-09-28 Assessing the size and growth of the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation industry BenDor, Todd K. Kwon, Joungwon Lester, T. William PLoS One Research Article Interest has focused on quantifying the size and scope of environmental markets, particularly those that offset ecosystem impacts or restore natural infrastructure to improve habitat or promote clean air and water. In this paper, we focus on the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation market, asking: what types of firms make up the mitigation “industry”? What are the economic impacts–i.e., the “size”–of the mitigation industry? How has this industry changed over time? We present the results of a national survey of mitigation firms and construct an input-output model of the industry’s economic impacts and employment. We also develop a comparative, 2014 model of the industry using data from a previous study of the broader, ecological restoration economy. Our findings suggest that the (2019, pre-COVID) mitigation industry collects annual revenues (direct economic impacts) in excess of $3.5 billion, which, along with additional indirect (supply chain) and induced (spillover) economic impacts, combine to over $9.6 billion in total output and support over 53,000 total jobs. We estimate 2014–2019 growth of ~35.2 percent in revenues, ~32.6 percent in total economic impacts, and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.25%. This places the mitigation industry within the range of other, well-established industries within the technical services sector. We suggest establishing North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes specifically for ecological restoration and mitigation firms, an essential step in generating accurate and consistent employment estimates in the future, particularly at sub-national geographic scales. Public Library of Science 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10529541/ /pubmed/37756326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285139 Text en © 2023 BenDor et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
BenDor, Todd K.
Kwon, Joungwon
Lester, T. William
Assessing the size and growth of the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation industry
title Assessing the size and growth of the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation industry
title_full Assessing the size and growth of the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation industry
title_fullStr Assessing the size and growth of the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation industry
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the size and growth of the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation industry
title_short Assessing the size and growth of the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation industry
title_sort assessing the size and growth of the us wetland and stream compensatory mitigation industry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10529541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37756326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285139
work_keys_str_mv AT bendortoddk assessingthesizeandgrowthoftheuswetlandandstreamcompensatorymitigationindustry
AT kwonjoungwon assessingthesizeandgrowthoftheuswetlandandstreamcompensatorymitigationindustry
AT lestertwilliam assessingthesizeandgrowthoftheuswetlandandstreamcompensatorymitigationindustry