Cargando…

Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels

The binding of actinide ions (Am(III) and U(VI)) in aqueous solutions by hybrid silica–hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticles (NPs) and xerogels (XGs) has been studied by means of batch experiments at different pH values (4, 7, and 9) under ambient atmospheric conditions. Both materials pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ioannidis, Ioannis, Pashalidis, Ioannis, Arkas, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10530514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754371
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9090690
_version_ 1785111521615937536
author Ioannidis, Ioannis
Pashalidis, Ioannis
Arkas, Michael
author_facet Ioannidis, Ioannis
Pashalidis, Ioannis
Arkas, Michael
author_sort Ioannidis, Ioannis
collection PubMed
description The binding of actinide ions (Am(III) and U(VI)) in aqueous solutions by hybrid silica–hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticles (NPs) and xerogels (XGs) has been studied by means of batch experiments at different pH values (4, 7, and 9) under ambient atmospheric conditions. Both materials present relatively high removal efficiency at pH 4 and pH 7 (>70%) for Am(III) and U(VI). The lower removal efficiency for the nanoparticles is basically associated with the compact structure of the nanoparticles and the lower permeability and access to active amine groups compared to xerogels, and the negative charge of the radionuclide species is formed under alkaline conditions (e.g., UO(2)(CO(3))(3)(4−) and Am(CO(3))(2)(−)). Generally, the adsorption process is relatively slow due to the very low radionuclide concentrations used in the study and is basically governed by the actinide diffusion from the aqueous phase to the solid surface. On the other hand, adsorption is favored with increasing temperature, assuming that the reaction is endothermic and entropy-driven, which is associated with increasing randomness at the solid–liquid interphase upon actinide adsorption. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on hybrid silica–hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticle and xerogel materials used as adsorbents for americium and uranium at ultra-trace levels. Compared to other adsorbent materials used for binding americium and uranium ions, both materials show far higher binding efficiency. Xerogels could remove both actinides even from seawater by almost 90%, whereas nanoparticles could remove uranium by 80% and americium by 70%. The above, along with their simple derivatization to increase the selectivity towards a specific radionuclide and their easy processing to be included in separation technologies, could make these materials attractive candidates for the treatment of radionuclide/actinide-contaminated water.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10530514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105305142023-09-28 Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels Ioannidis, Ioannis Pashalidis, Ioannis Arkas, Michael Gels Article The binding of actinide ions (Am(III) and U(VI)) in aqueous solutions by hybrid silica–hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticles (NPs) and xerogels (XGs) has been studied by means of batch experiments at different pH values (4, 7, and 9) under ambient atmospheric conditions. Both materials present relatively high removal efficiency at pH 4 and pH 7 (>70%) for Am(III) and U(VI). The lower removal efficiency for the nanoparticles is basically associated with the compact structure of the nanoparticles and the lower permeability and access to active amine groups compared to xerogels, and the negative charge of the radionuclide species is formed under alkaline conditions (e.g., UO(2)(CO(3))(3)(4−) and Am(CO(3))(2)(−)). Generally, the adsorption process is relatively slow due to the very low radionuclide concentrations used in the study and is basically governed by the actinide diffusion from the aqueous phase to the solid surface. On the other hand, adsorption is favored with increasing temperature, assuming that the reaction is endothermic and entropy-driven, which is associated with increasing randomness at the solid–liquid interphase upon actinide adsorption. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on hybrid silica–hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticle and xerogel materials used as adsorbents for americium and uranium at ultra-trace levels. Compared to other adsorbent materials used for binding americium and uranium ions, both materials show far higher binding efficiency. Xerogels could remove both actinides even from seawater by almost 90%, whereas nanoparticles could remove uranium by 80% and americium by 70%. The above, along with their simple derivatization to increase the selectivity towards a specific radionuclide and their easy processing to be included in separation technologies, could make these materials attractive candidates for the treatment of radionuclide/actinide-contaminated water. MDPI 2023-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10530514/ /pubmed/37754371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9090690 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ioannidis, Ioannis
Pashalidis, Ioannis
Arkas, Michael
Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels
title Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels
title_full Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels
title_fullStr Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels
title_full_unstemmed Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels
title_short Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels
title_sort actinide ion (americium-241 and uranium-232) interaction with hybrid silica–hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticles and xerogels
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10530514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754371
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9090690
work_keys_str_mv AT ioannidisioannis actinideionamericium241anduranium232interactionwithhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels
AT pashalidisioannis actinideionamericium241anduranium232interactionwithhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels
AT arkasmichael actinideionamericium241anduranium232interactionwithhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels