Cargando…
Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels
The binding of actinide ions (Am(III) and U(VI)) in aqueous solutions by hybrid silica–hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticles (NPs) and xerogels (XGs) has been studied by means of batch experiments at different pH values (4, 7, and 9) under ambient atmospheric conditions. Both materials pr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10530514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9090690 |
_version_ | 1785111521615937536 |
---|---|
author | Ioannidis, Ioannis Pashalidis, Ioannis Arkas, Michael |
author_facet | Ioannidis, Ioannis Pashalidis, Ioannis Arkas, Michael |
author_sort | Ioannidis, Ioannis |
collection | PubMed |
description | The binding of actinide ions (Am(III) and U(VI)) in aqueous solutions by hybrid silica–hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticles (NPs) and xerogels (XGs) has been studied by means of batch experiments at different pH values (4, 7, and 9) under ambient atmospheric conditions. Both materials present relatively high removal efficiency at pH 4 and pH 7 (>70%) for Am(III) and U(VI). The lower removal efficiency for the nanoparticles is basically associated with the compact structure of the nanoparticles and the lower permeability and access to active amine groups compared to xerogels, and the negative charge of the radionuclide species is formed under alkaline conditions (e.g., UO(2)(CO(3))(3)(4−) and Am(CO(3))(2)(−)). Generally, the adsorption process is relatively slow due to the very low radionuclide concentrations used in the study and is basically governed by the actinide diffusion from the aqueous phase to the solid surface. On the other hand, adsorption is favored with increasing temperature, assuming that the reaction is endothermic and entropy-driven, which is associated with increasing randomness at the solid–liquid interphase upon actinide adsorption. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on hybrid silica–hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticle and xerogel materials used as adsorbents for americium and uranium at ultra-trace levels. Compared to other adsorbent materials used for binding americium and uranium ions, both materials show far higher binding efficiency. Xerogels could remove both actinides even from seawater by almost 90%, whereas nanoparticles could remove uranium by 80% and americium by 70%. The above, along with their simple derivatization to increase the selectivity towards a specific radionuclide and their easy processing to be included in separation technologies, could make these materials attractive candidates for the treatment of radionuclide/actinide-contaminated water. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10530514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105305142023-09-28 Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels Ioannidis, Ioannis Pashalidis, Ioannis Arkas, Michael Gels Article The binding of actinide ions (Am(III) and U(VI)) in aqueous solutions by hybrid silica–hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticles (NPs) and xerogels (XGs) has been studied by means of batch experiments at different pH values (4, 7, and 9) under ambient atmospheric conditions. Both materials present relatively high removal efficiency at pH 4 and pH 7 (>70%) for Am(III) and U(VI). The lower removal efficiency for the nanoparticles is basically associated with the compact structure of the nanoparticles and the lower permeability and access to active amine groups compared to xerogels, and the negative charge of the radionuclide species is formed under alkaline conditions (e.g., UO(2)(CO(3))(3)(4−) and Am(CO(3))(2)(−)). Generally, the adsorption process is relatively slow due to the very low radionuclide concentrations used in the study and is basically governed by the actinide diffusion from the aqueous phase to the solid surface. On the other hand, adsorption is favored with increasing temperature, assuming that the reaction is endothermic and entropy-driven, which is associated with increasing randomness at the solid–liquid interphase upon actinide adsorption. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on hybrid silica–hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticle and xerogel materials used as adsorbents for americium and uranium at ultra-trace levels. Compared to other adsorbent materials used for binding americium and uranium ions, both materials show far higher binding efficiency. Xerogels could remove both actinides even from seawater by almost 90%, whereas nanoparticles could remove uranium by 80% and americium by 70%. The above, along with their simple derivatization to increase the selectivity towards a specific radionuclide and their easy processing to be included in separation technologies, could make these materials attractive candidates for the treatment of radionuclide/actinide-contaminated water. MDPI 2023-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10530514/ /pubmed/37754371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9090690 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ioannidis, Ioannis Pashalidis, Ioannis Arkas, Michael Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels |
title | Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels |
title_full | Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels |
title_fullStr | Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels |
title_full_unstemmed | Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels |
title_short | Actinide Ion (Americium-241 and Uranium-232) Interaction with Hybrid Silica–Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels |
title_sort | actinide ion (americium-241 and uranium-232) interaction with hybrid silica–hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticles and xerogels |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10530514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9090690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ioannidisioannis actinideionamericium241anduranium232interactionwithhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels AT pashalidisioannis actinideionamericium241anduranium232interactionwithhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels AT arkasmichael actinideionamericium241anduranium232interactionwithhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels |