Cargando…
Comment on Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10530770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20186715 |
_version_ | 1785111563379671040 |
---|---|
author | Foxon, Floe Shiffman, Saul |
author_facet | Foxon, Floe Shiffman, Saul |
author_sort | Foxon, Floe |
collection | PubMed |
description | |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10530770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105307702023-09-28 Comment on Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837 Foxon, Floe Shiffman, Saul Int J Environ Res Public Health Comment MDPI 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10530770/ /pubmed/37754574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20186715 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Comment Foxon, Floe Shiffman, Saul Comment on Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837 |
title | Comment on Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837 |
title_full | Comment on Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837 |
title_fullStr | Comment on Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comment on Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837 |
title_short | Comment on Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837 |
title_sort | comment on wang et al. consumption of juul vs. other e-cigarette brands among u.s. e-cigarette users: evidence from wave 5 of the path study. int. j. environ. res. public health 2022, 19, 10837 |
topic | Comment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10530770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20186715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foxonfloe commentonwangetalconsumptionofjuulvsotherecigarettebrandsamongusecigaretteusersevidencefromwave5ofthepathstudyintjenvironrespublichealth20221910837 AT shiffmansaul commentonwangetalconsumptionofjuulvsotherecigarettebrandsamongusecigaretteusersevidencefromwave5ofthepathstudyintjenvironrespublichealth20221910837 |