Cargando…
Revisiting Assessment of Computational Methods for Hi-C Data Analysis
The performances of algorithms for Hi-C data preprocessing, the identification of topologically associating domains, and the detection of chromatin interactions and promoter–enhancer interactions have been mostly evaluated using semi-quantitative or synthetic data approaches, without utilizing the m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37762117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241813814 |
_version_ | 1785111673487491072 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Jing Zhu, Xingxing Wang, Rui Li, Mingzhou Tang, Qianzi |
author_facet | Yang, Jing Zhu, Xingxing Wang, Rui Li, Mingzhou Tang, Qianzi |
author_sort | Yang, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | The performances of algorithms for Hi-C data preprocessing, the identification of topologically associating domains, and the detection of chromatin interactions and promoter–enhancer interactions have been mostly evaluated using semi-quantitative or synthetic data approaches, without utilizing the most recent methods, since 2017. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated 24 popular state-of-the-art methods for the complete end-to-end pipeline of Hi-C data analysis, using manually curated or experimentally validated benchmark datasets, including a CRISPR dataset for promoter–enhancer interaction validation. Our results indicate that, although no single method exhibited superior performance in all situations, HiC-Pro, DomainCaller, and Fit-Hi-C2 showed relatively balanced performances of most evaluation metrics for preprocessing, topologically associating domain identification, and chromatin interaction/promoter–enhancer interaction detection, respectively. The comprehensive comparison presented in this manuscript provides a reference for researchers to choose Hi-C analysis tools that best suit their needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10531246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105312462023-09-28 Revisiting Assessment of Computational Methods for Hi-C Data Analysis Yang, Jing Zhu, Xingxing Wang, Rui Li, Mingzhou Tang, Qianzi Int J Mol Sci Article The performances of algorithms for Hi-C data preprocessing, the identification of topologically associating domains, and the detection of chromatin interactions and promoter–enhancer interactions have been mostly evaluated using semi-quantitative or synthetic data approaches, without utilizing the most recent methods, since 2017. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated 24 popular state-of-the-art methods for the complete end-to-end pipeline of Hi-C data analysis, using manually curated or experimentally validated benchmark datasets, including a CRISPR dataset for promoter–enhancer interaction validation. Our results indicate that, although no single method exhibited superior performance in all situations, HiC-Pro, DomainCaller, and Fit-Hi-C2 showed relatively balanced performances of most evaluation metrics for preprocessing, topologically associating domain identification, and chromatin interaction/promoter–enhancer interaction detection, respectively. The comprehensive comparison presented in this manuscript provides a reference for researchers to choose Hi-C analysis tools that best suit their needs. MDPI 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10531246/ /pubmed/37762117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241813814 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yang, Jing Zhu, Xingxing Wang, Rui Li, Mingzhou Tang, Qianzi Revisiting Assessment of Computational Methods for Hi-C Data Analysis |
title | Revisiting Assessment of Computational Methods for Hi-C Data Analysis |
title_full | Revisiting Assessment of Computational Methods for Hi-C Data Analysis |
title_fullStr | Revisiting Assessment of Computational Methods for Hi-C Data Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Revisiting Assessment of Computational Methods for Hi-C Data Analysis |
title_short | Revisiting Assessment of Computational Methods for Hi-C Data Analysis |
title_sort | revisiting assessment of computational methods for hi-c data analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37762117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241813814 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangjing revisitingassessmentofcomputationalmethodsforhicdataanalysis AT zhuxingxing revisitingassessmentofcomputationalmethodsforhicdataanalysis AT wangrui revisitingassessmentofcomputationalmethodsforhicdataanalysis AT limingzhou revisitingassessmentofcomputationalmethodsforhicdataanalysis AT tangqianzi revisitingassessmentofcomputationalmethodsforhicdataanalysis |