Cargando…

Psychometric Properties of Different Versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire in Female Aesthetic Patients

The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the psychometric properties (internal consistency and factorial validity) of different versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) in a sample of female aesthetic patients. The sample included 296 women attending aesthetic clinics, with ages ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernandes, Helder Miguel, Soler, Patrícia, Monteiro, Diogo, Cid, Luís, Novaes, Jefferson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182590
_version_ 1785111697336303616
author Fernandes, Helder Miguel
Soler, Patrícia
Monteiro, Diogo
Cid, Luís
Novaes, Jefferson
author_facet Fernandes, Helder Miguel
Soler, Patrícia
Monteiro, Diogo
Cid, Luís
Novaes, Jefferson
author_sort Fernandes, Helder Miguel
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the psychometric properties (internal consistency and factorial validity) of different versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) in a sample of female aesthetic patients. The sample included 296 women attending aesthetic clinics, with ages ranging between 18 and 70 years (M = 32.23, SD = 11.35) and body mass index between 17.10 and 45.00 kg/m(2) (M = 24.70, SD = 4.07). Nine different length versions of the BSQ (BSQ-34, BSQ-32, BSQ-16A, BSQ-16B, BSQ-14, BSQ-8A, BSQ-8B, BSQ-8C and BSQ-8D) were subjected to confirmatory factor analyses, using a robust maximum likelihood estimator. Robust fit indices indicated that the BSQ-8D version was the better-fitting and more parsimonious model (S-Bχ(2)/df = 1.81, CFI = 0.963, RMSEA = 0.052, SRMR = 0.043). This short version also showed appropriate reliability (McDonald’s omega and composite reliability = 0.87) and a very high correlation with the original BSQ-34 version (r = 0.95). In sum, these findings suggest that the BSQ-8D is the most valid, reliable and suitable BSQ version for measuring body shape concerns in female aesthetic patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10531348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105313482023-09-28 Psychometric Properties of Different Versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire in Female Aesthetic Patients Fernandes, Helder Miguel Soler, Patrícia Monteiro, Diogo Cid, Luís Novaes, Jefferson Healthcare (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the psychometric properties (internal consistency and factorial validity) of different versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) in a sample of female aesthetic patients. The sample included 296 women attending aesthetic clinics, with ages ranging between 18 and 70 years (M = 32.23, SD = 11.35) and body mass index between 17.10 and 45.00 kg/m(2) (M = 24.70, SD = 4.07). Nine different length versions of the BSQ (BSQ-34, BSQ-32, BSQ-16A, BSQ-16B, BSQ-14, BSQ-8A, BSQ-8B, BSQ-8C and BSQ-8D) were subjected to confirmatory factor analyses, using a robust maximum likelihood estimator. Robust fit indices indicated that the BSQ-8D version was the better-fitting and more parsimonious model (S-Bχ(2)/df = 1.81, CFI = 0.963, RMSEA = 0.052, SRMR = 0.043). This short version also showed appropriate reliability (McDonald’s omega and composite reliability = 0.87) and a very high correlation with the original BSQ-34 version (r = 0.95). In sum, these findings suggest that the BSQ-8D is the most valid, reliable and suitable BSQ version for measuring body shape concerns in female aesthetic patients. MDPI 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10531348/ /pubmed/37761787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182590 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fernandes, Helder Miguel
Soler, Patrícia
Monteiro, Diogo
Cid, Luís
Novaes, Jefferson
Psychometric Properties of Different Versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire in Female Aesthetic Patients
title Psychometric Properties of Different Versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire in Female Aesthetic Patients
title_full Psychometric Properties of Different Versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire in Female Aesthetic Patients
title_fullStr Psychometric Properties of Different Versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire in Female Aesthetic Patients
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric Properties of Different Versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire in Female Aesthetic Patients
title_short Psychometric Properties of Different Versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire in Female Aesthetic Patients
title_sort psychometric properties of different versions of the body shape questionnaire in female aesthetic patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182590
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandesheldermiguel psychometricpropertiesofdifferentversionsofthebodyshapequestionnaireinfemaleaestheticpatients
AT solerpatricia psychometricpropertiesofdifferentversionsofthebodyshapequestionnaireinfemaleaestheticpatients
AT monteirodiogo psychometricpropertiesofdifferentversionsofthebodyshapequestionnaireinfemaleaestheticpatients
AT cidluis psychometricpropertiesofdifferentversionsofthebodyshapequestionnaireinfemaleaestheticpatients
AT novaesjefferson psychometricpropertiesofdifferentversionsofthebodyshapequestionnaireinfemaleaestheticpatients