Cargando…

Are Primary Outcomes Really Primary? An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Nationwide Web-Based Survey Study for Outcomes Reflecting Real Symptoms and Needs of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation

As primary outcomes differ among clinical lumbar disc herniation (LDH) studies, this study aimed to explore outcomes reflecting real-world patient experiences through an exploratory questionnaire survey. Those diagnosed with LDH having radiating leg pain in South Korea in November of 2022 (N = 500)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Doori, Kim, Soo-Jin, Lee, Yoon Jae, Yang, Chang Sop, Han, Chang-Hyun, Ha, In-Hyuk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761795
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182598
_version_ 1785111717756272640
author Kim, Doori
Kim, Soo-Jin
Lee, Yoon Jae
Yang, Chang Sop
Han, Chang-Hyun
Ha, In-Hyuk
author_facet Kim, Doori
Kim, Soo-Jin
Lee, Yoon Jae
Yang, Chang Sop
Han, Chang-Hyun
Ha, In-Hyuk
author_sort Kim, Doori
collection PubMed
description As primary outcomes differ among clinical lumbar disc herniation (LDH) studies, this study aimed to explore outcomes reflecting real-world patient experiences through an exploratory questionnaire survey. Those diagnosed with LDH having radiating leg pain in South Korea in November of 2022 (N = 500) were administered a questionnaire including basic characteristics, disease onset, symptoms and severity, priority symptoms for improvement, and important treatment factors. Outcome measures included the identification of priority symptoms and disabilities. Most common symptoms were numbness in the leg (N = 435, 87.0%) and back pain (N = 406, 81.2%); most common disabilities were discomfort in sitting (N = 323, 64.6%) and lifting (N = 318, 63.6%). The highest priority symptom was back pain (N = 242, 48.4%). A satisfactory degree of symptom improvement was a decrease of at least 3 points on the numeric rating scale. The majority of respondents preferred improvement in disability over pain (N = 270, 55.8%), a stable effect over a rapid effect (N = 391, 78.2%), and safety over treatment efficacy (N = 282, 56.4%). Safety (N = 129, 25.8%) and cost (N = 111, 22.2%) were the most important treatment factors. Improvements in back pain, leg pain, sitting, and sleeping were prioritized, and safety, stable treatment effect, and functional recovery were desired. Clinical trials for LDH should be designed to reflect this real-world patient need. Further study to examine the patients’ symptoms and needs in details is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10531434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105314342023-09-28 Are Primary Outcomes Really Primary? An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Nationwide Web-Based Survey Study for Outcomes Reflecting Real Symptoms and Needs of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation Kim, Doori Kim, Soo-Jin Lee, Yoon Jae Yang, Chang Sop Han, Chang-Hyun Ha, In-Hyuk Healthcare (Basel) Article As primary outcomes differ among clinical lumbar disc herniation (LDH) studies, this study aimed to explore outcomes reflecting real-world patient experiences through an exploratory questionnaire survey. Those diagnosed with LDH having radiating leg pain in South Korea in November of 2022 (N = 500) were administered a questionnaire including basic characteristics, disease onset, symptoms and severity, priority symptoms for improvement, and important treatment factors. Outcome measures included the identification of priority symptoms and disabilities. Most common symptoms were numbness in the leg (N = 435, 87.0%) and back pain (N = 406, 81.2%); most common disabilities were discomfort in sitting (N = 323, 64.6%) and lifting (N = 318, 63.6%). The highest priority symptom was back pain (N = 242, 48.4%). A satisfactory degree of symptom improvement was a decrease of at least 3 points on the numeric rating scale. The majority of respondents preferred improvement in disability over pain (N = 270, 55.8%), a stable effect over a rapid effect (N = 391, 78.2%), and safety over treatment efficacy (N = 282, 56.4%). Safety (N = 129, 25.8%) and cost (N = 111, 22.2%) were the most important treatment factors. Improvements in back pain, leg pain, sitting, and sleeping were prioritized, and safety, stable treatment effect, and functional recovery were desired. Clinical trials for LDH should be designed to reflect this real-world patient need. Further study to examine the patients’ symptoms and needs in details is needed. MDPI 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10531434/ /pubmed/37761795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182598 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Doori
Kim, Soo-Jin
Lee, Yoon Jae
Yang, Chang Sop
Han, Chang-Hyun
Ha, In-Hyuk
Are Primary Outcomes Really Primary? An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Nationwide Web-Based Survey Study for Outcomes Reflecting Real Symptoms and Needs of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation
title Are Primary Outcomes Really Primary? An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Nationwide Web-Based Survey Study for Outcomes Reflecting Real Symptoms and Needs of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_full Are Primary Outcomes Really Primary? An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Nationwide Web-Based Survey Study for Outcomes Reflecting Real Symptoms and Needs of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_fullStr Are Primary Outcomes Really Primary? An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Nationwide Web-Based Survey Study for Outcomes Reflecting Real Symptoms and Needs of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_full_unstemmed Are Primary Outcomes Really Primary? An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Nationwide Web-Based Survey Study for Outcomes Reflecting Real Symptoms and Needs of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_short Are Primary Outcomes Really Primary? An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Nationwide Web-Based Survey Study for Outcomes Reflecting Real Symptoms and Needs of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_sort are primary outcomes really primary? an exploratory cross-sectional nationwide web-based survey study for outcomes reflecting real symptoms and needs of patients with lumbar disc herniation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761795
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182598
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdoori areprimaryoutcomesreallyprimaryanexploratorycrosssectionalnationwidewebbasedsurveystudyforoutcomesreflectingrealsymptomsandneedsofpatientswithlumbardischerniation
AT kimsoojin areprimaryoutcomesreallyprimaryanexploratorycrosssectionalnationwidewebbasedsurveystudyforoutcomesreflectingrealsymptomsandneedsofpatientswithlumbardischerniation
AT leeyoonjae areprimaryoutcomesreallyprimaryanexploratorycrosssectionalnationwidewebbasedsurveystudyforoutcomesreflectingrealsymptomsandneedsofpatientswithlumbardischerniation
AT yangchangsop areprimaryoutcomesreallyprimaryanexploratorycrosssectionalnationwidewebbasedsurveystudyforoutcomesreflectingrealsymptomsandneedsofpatientswithlumbardischerniation
AT hanchanghyun areprimaryoutcomesreallyprimaryanexploratorycrosssectionalnationwidewebbasedsurveystudyforoutcomesreflectingrealsymptomsandneedsofpatientswithlumbardischerniation
AT hainhyuk areprimaryoutcomesreallyprimaryanexploratorycrosssectionalnationwidewebbasedsurveystudyforoutcomesreflectingrealsymptomsandneedsofpatientswithlumbardischerniation