Reply to Foxon, F.; Shiffman, S. Comment on “Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837”

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yu, Duan, Zongshuan, Weaver, Scott R., Popova, Lucy, Spears, Claire A., Ashley, David L., Pechacek, Terry F., Eriksen, Michael P., Huang, Jidong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Reply
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754577
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20186717
_version_ 1785111721030975488
author Wang, Yu
Duan, Zongshuan
Weaver, Scott R.
Popova, Lucy
Spears, Claire A.
Ashley, David L.
Pechacek, Terry F.
Eriksen, Michael P.
Huang, Jidong
author_facet Wang, Yu
Duan, Zongshuan
Weaver, Scott R.
Popova, Lucy
Spears, Claire A.
Ashley, David L.
Pechacek, Terry F.
Eriksen, Michael P.
Huang, Jidong
author_sort Wang, Yu
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10531448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105314482023-09-28 Reply to Foxon, F.; Shiffman, S. Comment on “Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837” Wang, Yu Duan, Zongshuan Weaver, Scott R. Popova, Lucy Spears, Claire A. Ashley, David L. Pechacek, Terry F. Eriksen, Michael P. Huang, Jidong Int J Environ Res Public Health Reply MDPI 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10531448/ /pubmed/37754577 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20186717 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Reply
Wang, Yu
Duan, Zongshuan
Weaver, Scott R.
Popova, Lucy
Spears, Claire A.
Ashley, David L.
Pechacek, Terry F.
Eriksen, Michael P.
Huang, Jidong
Reply to Foxon, F.; Shiffman, S. Comment on “Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837”
title Reply to Foxon, F.; Shiffman, S. Comment on “Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837”
title_full Reply to Foxon, F.; Shiffman, S. Comment on “Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837”
title_fullStr Reply to Foxon, F.; Shiffman, S. Comment on “Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837”
title_full_unstemmed Reply to Foxon, F.; Shiffman, S. Comment on “Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837”
title_short Reply to Foxon, F.; Shiffman, S. Comment on “Wang et al. Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10837”
title_sort reply to foxon, f.; shiffman, s. comment on “wang et al. consumption of juul vs. other e-cigarette brands among u.s. e-cigarette users: evidence from wave 5 of the path study. int. j. environ. res. public health 2022, 19, 10837”
topic Reply
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754577
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20186717
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyu replytofoxonfshiffmanscommentonwangetalconsumptionofjuulvsotherecigarettebrandsamongusecigaretteusersevidencefromwave5ofthepathstudyintjenvironrespublichealth20221910837
AT duanzongshuan replytofoxonfshiffmanscommentonwangetalconsumptionofjuulvsotherecigarettebrandsamongusecigaretteusersevidencefromwave5ofthepathstudyintjenvironrespublichealth20221910837
AT weaverscottr replytofoxonfshiffmanscommentonwangetalconsumptionofjuulvsotherecigarettebrandsamongusecigaretteusersevidencefromwave5ofthepathstudyintjenvironrespublichealth20221910837
AT popovalucy replytofoxonfshiffmanscommentonwangetalconsumptionofjuulvsotherecigarettebrandsamongusecigaretteusersevidencefromwave5ofthepathstudyintjenvironrespublichealth20221910837
AT spearsclairea replytofoxonfshiffmanscommentonwangetalconsumptionofjuulvsotherecigarettebrandsamongusecigaretteusersevidencefromwave5ofthepathstudyintjenvironrespublichealth20221910837
AT ashleydavidl replytofoxonfshiffmanscommentonwangetalconsumptionofjuulvsotherecigarettebrandsamongusecigaretteusersevidencefromwave5ofthepathstudyintjenvironrespublichealth20221910837
AT pechacekterryf replytofoxonfshiffmanscommentonwangetalconsumptionofjuulvsotherecigarettebrandsamongusecigaretteusersevidencefromwave5ofthepathstudyintjenvironrespublichealth20221910837
AT eriksenmichaelp replytofoxonfshiffmanscommentonwangetalconsumptionofjuulvsotherecigarettebrandsamongusecigaretteusersevidencefromwave5ofthepathstudyintjenvironrespublichealth20221910837
AT huangjidong replytofoxonfshiffmanscommentonwangetalconsumptionofjuulvsotherecigarettebrandsamongusecigaretteusersevidencefromwave5ofthepathstudyintjenvironrespublichealth20221910837

Ejemplares similares