Cargando…
Differences in Improvement of Physical Function in Older Adults with Long-Term Care Insurance with and without Falls: A Retrospective Cohort Study
(1) Background: This study examined the differences in changes in physical function with and without falls after daycare use among frail older adults with long-term care insurance (LTCI). (2) Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 82 of 96 consecutive daycare center users met the inclusion cri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182558 |
_version_ | 1785111725178093568 |
---|---|
author | Kitamura, Masahiro Umeo, Junichi Kurihara, Kyohei Yamato, Takuji Nagasaki, Takayuki Mizota, Katsuhiko Kogo, Haruki Tanaka, Shinichi Yoshizawa, Takashi |
author_facet | Kitamura, Masahiro Umeo, Junichi Kurihara, Kyohei Yamato, Takuji Nagasaki, Takayuki Mizota, Katsuhiko Kogo, Haruki Tanaka, Shinichi Yoshizawa, Takashi |
author_sort | Kitamura, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: This study examined the differences in changes in physical function with and without falls after daycare use among frail older adults with long-term care insurance (LTCI). (2) Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 82 of 96 consecutive daycare center users met the inclusion criteria. The participants were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of falls 6–12 months after use. Participant characteristics in the fall and non-fall groups and physical function at baseline and six months in each group were compared. Using analysis of covariance, we analyzed physical function and its changes between the two groups, and cut-off values were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves. (3) Results: Gait speed, timed up-and-go test, and 30 s chair stand test (CS30) improved significantly over six months in the no-fall group (n = 70) and all participants (n = 82) (p < 0.01). Gait speed in the fall group (n = 12) improved significantly over six months (p = 0.04). The fall group had significantly lower adjusted ΔCS30 scores than the no-fall group (p = 0.03), with a cutoff value of 2 (p = 0.024). (4) Conclusions: In older adults with LTCI, physical function with and without falls after daycare use differed by ΔCS30, with a cutoff value of 2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10531465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105314652023-09-28 Differences in Improvement of Physical Function in Older Adults with Long-Term Care Insurance with and without Falls: A Retrospective Cohort Study Kitamura, Masahiro Umeo, Junichi Kurihara, Kyohei Yamato, Takuji Nagasaki, Takayuki Mizota, Katsuhiko Kogo, Haruki Tanaka, Shinichi Yoshizawa, Takashi Healthcare (Basel) Brief Report (1) Background: This study examined the differences in changes in physical function with and without falls after daycare use among frail older adults with long-term care insurance (LTCI). (2) Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 82 of 96 consecutive daycare center users met the inclusion criteria. The participants were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of falls 6–12 months after use. Participant characteristics in the fall and non-fall groups and physical function at baseline and six months in each group were compared. Using analysis of covariance, we analyzed physical function and its changes between the two groups, and cut-off values were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves. (3) Results: Gait speed, timed up-and-go test, and 30 s chair stand test (CS30) improved significantly over six months in the no-fall group (n = 70) and all participants (n = 82) (p < 0.01). Gait speed in the fall group (n = 12) improved significantly over six months (p = 0.04). The fall group had significantly lower adjusted ΔCS30 scores than the no-fall group (p = 0.03), with a cutoff value of 2 (p = 0.024). (4) Conclusions: In older adults with LTCI, physical function with and without falls after daycare use differed by ΔCS30, with a cutoff value of 2. MDPI 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10531465/ /pubmed/37761755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182558 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Kitamura, Masahiro Umeo, Junichi Kurihara, Kyohei Yamato, Takuji Nagasaki, Takayuki Mizota, Katsuhiko Kogo, Haruki Tanaka, Shinichi Yoshizawa, Takashi Differences in Improvement of Physical Function in Older Adults with Long-Term Care Insurance with and without Falls: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title | Differences in Improvement of Physical Function in Older Adults with Long-Term Care Insurance with and without Falls: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Differences in Improvement of Physical Function in Older Adults with Long-Term Care Insurance with and without Falls: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Differences in Improvement of Physical Function in Older Adults with Long-Term Care Insurance with and without Falls: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Improvement of Physical Function in Older Adults with Long-Term Care Insurance with and without Falls: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Differences in Improvement of Physical Function in Older Adults with Long-Term Care Insurance with and without Falls: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | differences in improvement of physical function in older adults with long-term care insurance with and without falls: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitamuramasahiro differencesinimprovementofphysicalfunctioninolderadultswithlongtermcareinsurancewithandwithoutfallsaretrospectivecohortstudy AT umeojunichi differencesinimprovementofphysicalfunctioninolderadultswithlongtermcareinsurancewithandwithoutfallsaretrospectivecohortstudy AT kuriharakyohei differencesinimprovementofphysicalfunctioninolderadultswithlongtermcareinsurancewithandwithoutfallsaretrospectivecohortstudy AT yamatotakuji differencesinimprovementofphysicalfunctioninolderadultswithlongtermcareinsurancewithandwithoutfallsaretrospectivecohortstudy AT nagasakitakayuki differencesinimprovementofphysicalfunctioninolderadultswithlongtermcareinsurancewithandwithoutfallsaretrospectivecohortstudy AT mizotakatsuhiko differencesinimprovementofphysicalfunctioninolderadultswithlongtermcareinsurancewithandwithoutfallsaretrospectivecohortstudy AT kogoharuki differencesinimprovementofphysicalfunctioninolderadultswithlongtermcareinsurancewithandwithoutfallsaretrospectivecohortstudy AT tanakashinichi differencesinimprovementofphysicalfunctioninolderadultswithlongtermcareinsurancewithandwithoutfallsaretrospectivecohortstudy AT yoshizawatakashi differencesinimprovementofphysicalfunctioninolderadultswithlongtermcareinsurancewithandwithoutfallsaretrospectivecohortstudy |