Cargando…
The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding
Mating control is crucial in honeybee breeding and commonly guaranteed by bringing virgin queens to isolated mating stations (IMS) for their nuptial flights. However, most breeding programs struggle to provide sufficiently many IMS. Research institutions routinely perform instrumental insemination o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761939 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14091799 |
_version_ | 1785111727517466624 |
---|---|
author | Du, Manuel Bernstein, Richard Hoppe, Andreas |
author_facet | Du, Manuel Bernstein, Richard Hoppe, Andreas |
author_sort | Du, Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mating control is crucial in honeybee breeding and commonly guaranteed by bringing virgin queens to isolated mating stations (IMS) for their nuptial flights. However, most breeding programs struggle to provide sufficiently many IMS. Research institutions routinely perform instrumental insemination of honeybees, but its potential to substitute IMS in breeding programs has not been sufficiently studied. We performed stochastic simulations to compare instrumental insemination strategies and mating on IMS in terms of genetic progress and inbreeding development. We focused on the role of paternal generation intervals, which can be shortened to two years with instrumental insemination in comparison to three years when using IMS. After 70 years, instrumental insemination yielded up to 42% higher genetic gain than IMS strategies—particularly with few available mating sites. Inbreeding rates with instrumental insemination and IMS were comparable. When the paternal generation interval in instrumental insemination was stretched to three years, the number of drone producers required for sustainable breeding was reduced substantially. In contrast, when shortening the interval to two years, it yielded the highest generational inbreeding rates (up to 2.28%). Overall, instrumental insemination with drones from a single colony appears as a viable strategy for honeybee breeding and a promising alternative to IMS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10531475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105314752023-09-28 The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding Du, Manuel Bernstein, Richard Hoppe, Andreas Genes (Basel) Article Mating control is crucial in honeybee breeding and commonly guaranteed by bringing virgin queens to isolated mating stations (IMS) for their nuptial flights. However, most breeding programs struggle to provide sufficiently many IMS. Research institutions routinely perform instrumental insemination of honeybees, but its potential to substitute IMS in breeding programs has not been sufficiently studied. We performed stochastic simulations to compare instrumental insemination strategies and mating on IMS in terms of genetic progress and inbreeding development. We focused on the role of paternal generation intervals, which can be shortened to two years with instrumental insemination in comparison to three years when using IMS. After 70 years, instrumental insemination yielded up to 42% higher genetic gain than IMS strategies—particularly with few available mating sites. Inbreeding rates with instrumental insemination and IMS were comparable. When the paternal generation interval in instrumental insemination was stretched to three years, the number of drone producers required for sustainable breeding was reduced substantially. In contrast, when shortening the interval to two years, it yielded the highest generational inbreeding rates (up to 2.28%). Overall, instrumental insemination with drones from a single colony appears as a viable strategy for honeybee breeding and a promising alternative to IMS. MDPI 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10531475/ /pubmed/37761939 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14091799 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Du, Manuel Bernstein, Richard Hoppe, Andreas The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding |
title | The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding |
title_full | The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding |
title_fullStr | The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding |
title_full_unstemmed | The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding |
title_short | The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding |
title_sort | potential of instrumental insemination for sustainable honeybee breeding |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761939 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14091799 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dumanuel thepotentialofinstrumentalinseminationforsustainablehoneybeebreeding AT bernsteinrichard thepotentialofinstrumentalinseminationforsustainablehoneybeebreeding AT hoppeandreas thepotentialofinstrumentalinseminationforsustainablehoneybeebreeding AT dumanuel potentialofinstrumentalinseminationforsustainablehoneybeebreeding AT bernsteinrichard potentialofinstrumentalinseminationforsustainablehoneybeebreeding AT hoppeandreas potentialofinstrumentalinseminationforsustainablehoneybeebreeding |