Cargando…

The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding

Mating control is crucial in honeybee breeding and commonly guaranteed by bringing virgin queens to isolated mating stations (IMS) for their nuptial flights. However, most breeding programs struggle to provide sufficiently many IMS. Research institutions routinely perform instrumental insemination o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Manuel, Bernstein, Richard, Hoppe, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761939
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14091799
_version_ 1785111727517466624
author Du, Manuel
Bernstein, Richard
Hoppe, Andreas
author_facet Du, Manuel
Bernstein, Richard
Hoppe, Andreas
author_sort Du, Manuel
collection PubMed
description Mating control is crucial in honeybee breeding and commonly guaranteed by bringing virgin queens to isolated mating stations (IMS) for their nuptial flights. However, most breeding programs struggle to provide sufficiently many IMS. Research institutions routinely perform instrumental insemination of honeybees, but its potential to substitute IMS in breeding programs has not been sufficiently studied. We performed stochastic simulations to compare instrumental insemination strategies and mating on IMS in terms of genetic progress and inbreeding development. We focused on the role of paternal generation intervals, which can be shortened to two years with instrumental insemination in comparison to three years when using IMS. After 70 years, instrumental insemination yielded up to 42% higher genetic gain than IMS strategies—particularly with few available mating sites. Inbreeding rates with instrumental insemination and IMS were comparable. When the paternal generation interval in instrumental insemination was stretched to three years, the number of drone producers required for sustainable breeding was reduced substantially. In contrast, when shortening the interval to two years, it yielded the highest generational inbreeding rates (up to 2.28%). Overall, instrumental insemination with drones from a single colony appears as a viable strategy for honeybee breeding and a promising alternative to IMS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10531475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105314752023-09-28 The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding Du, Manuel Bernstein, Richard Hoppe, Andreas Genes (Basel) Article Mating control is crucial in honeybee breeding and commonly guaranteed by bringing virgin queens to isolated mating stations (IMS) for their nuptial flights. However, most breeding programs struggle to provide sufficiently many IMS. Research institutions routinely perform instrumental insemination of honeybees, but its potential to substitute IMS in breeding programs has not been sufficiently studied. We performed stochastic simulations to compare instrumental insemination strategies and mating on IMS in terms of genetic progress and inbreeding development. We focused on the role of paternal generation intervals, which can be shortened to two years with instrumental insemination in comparison to three years when using IMS. After 70 years, instrumental insemination yielded up to 42% higher genetic gain than IMS strategies—particularly with few available mating sites. Inbreeding rates with instrumental insemination and IMS were comparable. When the paternal generation interval in instrumental insemination was stretched to three years, the number of drone producers required for sustainable breeding was reduced substantially. In contrast, when shortening the interval to two years, it yielded the highest generational inbreeding rates (up to 2.28%). Overall, instrumental insemination with drones from a single colony appears as a viable strategy for honeybee breeding and a promising alternative to IMS. MDPI 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10531475/ /pubmed/37761939 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14091799 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Du, Manuel
Bernstein, Richard
Hoppe, Andreas
The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding
title The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding
title_full The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding
title_fullStr The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding
title_full_unstemmed The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding
title_short The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding
title_sort potential of instrumental insemination for sustainable honeybee breeding
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761939
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14091799
work_keys_str_mv AT dumanuel thepotentialofinstrumentalinseminationforsustainablehoneybeebreeding
AT bernsteinrichard thepotentialofinstrumentalinseminationforsustainablehoneybeebreeding
AT hoppeandreas thepotentialofinstrumentalinseminationforsustainablehoneybeebreeding
AT dumanuel potentialofinstrumentalinseminationforsustainablehoneybeebreeding
AT bernsteinrichard potentialofinstrumentalinseminationforsustainablehoneybeebreeding
AT hoppeandreas potentialofinstrumentalinseminationforsustainablehoneybeebreeding