Cargando…

Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)—comprising repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)—for depression in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Methods: Comprehensive sea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Chun-Hung, Chou, Po-Han, Chuang, Hao-Yu, Yao, Chi-Yu, Chen, Wei-Jen, Tsai, Hsin-Chi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37762970
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12186030
_version_ 1785111840720683008
author Chang, Chun-Hung
Chou, Po-Han
Chuang, Hao-Yu
Yao, Chi-Yu
Chen, Wei-Jen
Tsai, Hsin-Chi
author_facet Chang, Chun-Hung
Chou, Po-Han
Chuang, Hao-Yu
Yao, Chi-Yu
Chen, Wei-Jen
Tsai, Hsin-Chi
author_sort Chang, Chun-Hung
collection PubMed
description Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)—comprising repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)—for depression in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 28 January 2023. Random-effects models assessed the treatment effects, and heterogeneity was evaluated through I(2) statistics and funnel plot inspection. Results: From 10 trials (234 participants; 8 rTMS, 2 tDCS), NIBS was found significantly more effective than sham in alleviating depressive symptoms (SMD: 0.588, 95% CI: 0.264–0.912; p < 0.001). rTMS, specifically, showed higher efficacy (SMD: 0.707, 95% CI: 0.306–1.108; p = 0.001) compared to sham, whereas tDCS outcomes were inconclusive (SMD: 0.271, 95% CI: −0.230 to 0.771; p = 0.289). Meta-regression found no correlation with the number of sessions, treatment intensity, or total dose. Notably, while post-treatment effects were significant, they diminished 1–2 months post intervention. Adverse events associated with NIBS were minimal, with no severe outcomes like seizures and suicide reported. Conclusions: rTMS emerged as a potent short-term intervention for depression in TBI patients, while tDCS findings remained equivocal. The long-term efficacy of NIBS is yet to be established, warranting further studies. The low adverse event rate reaffirms NIBS’s potential safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10531948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105319482023-09-28 Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials Chang, Chun-Hung Chou, Po-Han Chuang, Hao-Yu Yao, Chi-Yu Chen, Wei-Jen Tsai, Hsin-Chi J Clin Med Article Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)—comprising repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)—for depression in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 28 January 2023. Random-effects models assessed the treatment effects, and heterogeneity was evaluated through I(2) statistics and funnel plot inspection. Results: From 10 trials (234 participants; 8 rTMS, 2 tDCS), NIBS was found significantly more effective than sham in alleviating depressive symptoms (SMD: 0.588, 95% CI: 0.264–0.912; p < 0.001). rTMS, specifically, showed higher efficacy (SMD: 0.707, 95% CI: 0.306–1.108; p = 0.001) compared to sham, whereas tDCS outcomes were inconclusive (SMD: 0.271, 95% CI: −0.230 to 0.771; p = 0.289). Meta-regression found no correlation with the number of sessions, treatment intensity, or total dose. Notably, while post-treatment effects were significant, they diminished 1–2 months post intervention. Adverse events associated with NIBS were minimal, with no severe outcomes like seizures and suicide reported. Conclusions: rTMS emerged as a potent short-term intervention for depression in TBI patients, while tDCS findings remained equivocal. The long-term efficacy of NIBS is yet to be established, warranting further studies. The low adverse event rate reaffirms NIBS’s potential safety. MDPI 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10531948/ /pubmed/37762970 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12186030 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chang, Chun-Hung
Chou, Po-Han
Chuang, Hao-Yu
Yao, Chi-Yu
Chen, Wei-Jen
Tsai, Hsin-Chi
Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for treating depression in patients with traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37762970
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12186030
work_keys_str_mv AT changchunhung efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationfortreatingdepressioninpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryametaanalysisandmetaregressionofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT choupohan efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationfortreatingdepressioninpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryametaanalysisandmetaregressionofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chuanghaoyu efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationfortreatingdepressioninpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryametaanalysisandmetaregressionofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yaochiyu efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationfortreatingdepressioninpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryametaanalysisandmetaregressionofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenweijen efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationfortreatingdepressioninpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryametaanalysisandmetaregressionofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tsaihsinchi efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationfortreatingdepressioninpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryametaanalysisandmetaregressionofrandomizedcontrolledtrials