Cargando…
Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials
Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)—comprising repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)—for depression in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Methods: Comprehensive sea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37762970 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12186030 |
_version_ | 1785111840720683008 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Chun-Hung Chou, Po-Han Chuang, Hao-Yu Yao, Chi-Yu Chen, Wei-Jen Tsai, Hsin-Chi |
author_facet | Chang, Chun-Hung Chou, Po-Han Chuang, Hao-Yu Yao, Chi-Yu Chen, Wei-Jen Tsai, Hsin-Chi |
author_sort | Chang, Chun-Hung |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)—comprising repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)—for depression in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 28 January 2023. Random-effects models assessed the treatment effects, and heterogeneity was evaluated through I(2) statistics and funnel plot inspection. Results: From 10 trials (234 participants; 8 rTMS, 2 tDCS), NIBS was found significantly more effective than sham in alleviating depressive symptoms (SMD: 0.588, 95% CI: 0.264–0.912; p < 0.001). rTMS, specifically, showed higher efficacy (SMD: 0.707, 95% CI: 0.306–1.108; p = 0.001) compared to sham, whereas tDCS outcomes were inconclusive (SMD: 0.271, 95% CI: −0.230 to 0.771; p = 0.289). Meta-regression found no correlation with the number of sessions, treatment intensity, or total dose. Notably, while post-treatment effects were significant, they diminished 1–2 months post intervention. Adverse events associated with NIBS were minimal, with no severe outcomes like seizures and suicide reported. Conclusions: rTMS emerged as a potent short-term intervention for depression in TBI patients, while tDCS findings remained equivocal. The long-term efficacy of NIBS is yet to be established, warranting further studies. The low adverse event rate reaffirms NIBS’s potential safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10531948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105319482023-09-28 Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials Chang, Chun-Hung Chou, Po-Han Chuang, Hao-Yu Yao, Chi-Yu Chen, Wei-Jen Tsai, Hsin-Chi J Clin Med Article Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)—comprising repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)—for depression in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 28 January 2023. Random-effects models assessed the treatment effects, and heterogeneity was evaluated through I(2) statistics and funnel plot inspection. Results: From 10 trials (234 participants; 8 rTMS, 2 tDCS), NIBS was found significantly more effective than sham in alleviating depressive symptoms (SMD: 0.588, 95% CI: 0.264–0.912; p < 0.001). rTMS, specifically, showed higher efficacy (SMD: 0.707, 95% CI: 0.306–1.108; p = 0.001) compared to sham, whereas tDCS outcomes were inconclusive (SMD: 0.271, 95% CI: −0.230 to 0.771; p = 0.289). Meta-regression found no correlation with the number of sessions, treatment intensity, or total dose. Notably, while post-treatment effects were significant, they diminished 1–2 months post intervention. Adverse events associated with NIBS were minimal, with no severe outcomes like seizures and suicide reported. Conclusions: rTMS emerged as a potent short-term intervention for depression in TBI patients, while tDCS findings remained equivocal. The long-term efficacy of NIBS is yet to be established, warranting further studies. The low adverse event rate reaffirms NIBS’s potential safety. MDPI 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10531948/ /pubmed/37762970 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12186030 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chang, Chun-Hung Chou, Po-Han Chuang, Hao-Yu Yao, Chi-Yu Chen, Wei-Jen Tsai, Hsin-Chi Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for treating depression in patients with traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37762970 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12186030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changchunhung efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationfortreatingdepressioninpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryametaanalysisandmetaregressionofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT choupohan efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationfortreatingdepressioninpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryametaanalysisandmetaregressionofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chuanghaoyu efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationfortreatingdepressioninpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryametaanalysisandmetaregressionofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yaochiyu efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationfortreatingdepressioninpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryametaanalysisandmetaregressionofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenweijen efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationfortreatingdepressioninpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryametaanalysisandmetaregressionofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT tsaihsinchi efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationfortreatingdepressioninpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryametaanalysisandmetaregressionofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |