Cargando…
A Load–Velocity Relationship in Sprint?
The aims were to compare predicted maximal velocity from load–velocity relationships established with different resisted and assisted loads by different regression analyses to the measured maximal velocity during sprint running, and to compare maximal velocity measured between a robotic pulley syste...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754968 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8030135 |
_version_ | 1785111851737022464 |
---|---|
author | van den Tillaar, Roland Gleadhill, Sam Jiménez-Reyes, Pedro Nagahara, Ryu |
author_facet | van den Tillaar, Roland Gleadhill, Sam Jiménez-Reyes, Pedro Nagahara, Ryu |
author_sort | van den Tillaar, Roland |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aims were to compare predicted maximal velocity from load–velocity relationships established with different resisted and assisted loads by different regression analyses to the measured maximal velocity during sprint running, and to compare maximal velocity measured between a robotic pulley system and laser gun. Sixteen experienced male sprinters performed regular 50 m sprints, a 50 m with 5-kilogram-assisted sprint, and 10, 20, 30, and 30 m resisted sprints with, respectively, 65, 50, 25, and 10% calculated reduction in maximal velocity. Maximal velocity obtained by laser gun during the regular sprint was compared with predicted maximal velocity calculated from four trendlines (linear and polynomial based upon four resisted loads, and linear and polynomial based upon four resisted and one assisted load). Main findings demonstrate that the robotic pulley system and laser measure similar maximal velocities at all loads except at the load of 10% velocity reduction. Theoretical maximal velocity based upon calculated predictions were underestimated by 0.62–0.22 m/s (2.2–0.78 km/h; 6.7–2.3%) compared to measured maximal velocity. It was concluded that different regression analyses underestimated measured maximal velocity in regular sprinting and polynomial regression analysis (with resisted and assisted loads) estimation was closest to measured velocity (2.3%). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10531998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105319982023-09-28 A Load–Velocity Relationship in Sprint? van den Tillaar, Roland Gleadhill, Sam Jiménez-Reyes, Pedro Nagahara, Ryu J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Article The aims were to compare predicted maximal velocity from load–velocity relationships established with different resisted and assisted loads by different regression analyses to the measured maximal velocity during sprint running, and to compare maximal velocity measured between a robotic pulley system and laser gun. Sixteen experienced male sprinters performed regular 50 m sprints, a 50 m with 5-kilogram-assisted sprint, and 10, 20, 30, and 30 m resisted sprints with, respectively, 65, 50, 25, and 10% calculated reduction in maximal velocity. Maximal velocity obtained by laser gun during the regular sprint was compared with predicted maximal velocity calculated from four trendlines (linear and polynomial based upon four resisted loads, and linear and polynomial based upon four resisted and one assisted load). Main findings demonstrate that the robotic pulley system and laser measure similar maximal velocities at all loads except at the load of 10% velocity reduction. Theoretical maximal velocity based upon calculated predictions were underestimated by 0.62–0.22 m/s (2.2–0.78 km/h; 6.7–2.3%) compared to measured maximal velocity. It was concluded that different regression analyses underestimated measured maximal velocity in regular sprinting and polynomial regression analysis (with resisted and assisted loads) estimation was closest to measured velocity (2.3%). MDPI 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10531998/ /pubmed/37754968 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8030135 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article van den Tillaar, Roland Gleadhill, Sam Jiménez-Reyes, Pedro Nagahara, Ryu A Load–Velocity Relationship in Sprint? |
title | A Load–Velocity Relationship in Sprint? |
title_full | A Load–Velocity Relationship in Sprint? |
title_fullStr | A Load–Velocity Relationship in Sprint? |
title_full_unstemmed | A Load–Velocity Relationship in Sprint? |
title_short | A Load–Velocity Relationship in Sprint? |
title_sort | load–velocity relationship in sprint? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754968 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8030135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandentillaarroland aloadvelocityrelationshipinsprint AT gleadhillsam aloadvelocityrelationshipinsprint AT jimenezreyespedro aloadvelocityrelationshipinsprint AT nagahararyu aloadvelocityrelationshipinsprint AT vandentillaarroland loadvelocityrelationshipinsprint AT gleadhillsam loadvelocityrelationshipinsprint AT jimenezreyespedro loadvelocityrelationshipinsprint AT nagahararyu loadvelocityrelationshipinsprint |