Cargando…

A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration

Biodegradable guided bone regeneration (GBR) membranes consist primarily of collagen and aliphatic polyesters. This study assessed the comparative efficacy of a poly(l-lactic-caprolactone) [P(LA/CL)] membrane versus that of a collagen membrane in GBR. Patients requiring GBR simultaneously or before...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shido, Rena, Ohba, Seigo, Tominaga, Risa, Sumita, Yoshinori, Asahina, Izumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10532217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37762935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185994
_version_ 1785111903955058688
author Shido, Rena
Ohba, Seigo
Tominaga, Risa
Sumita, Yoshinori
Asahina, Izumi
author_facet Shido, Rena
Ohba, Seigo
Tominaga, Risa
Sumita, Yoshinori
Asahina, Izumi
author_sort Shido, Rena
collection PubMed
description Biodegradable guided bone regeneration (GBR) membranes consist primarily of collagen and aliphatic polyesters. This study assessed the comparative efficacy of a poly(l-lactic-caprolactone) [P(LA/CL)] membrane versus that of a collagen membrane in GBR. Patients requiring GBR simultaneously or before dental implant placement in edentulous regions were randomly assigned to one of two membranes. Within each membrane, they were subdivided into 3 groups: dental implants were placed simultaneously with GBR in groups A and B, and 180 days post-GBR in group C. The augmented bone width was measured at 1, 3, and 6 mm from the implant’s neck (groups A and B) or the reference line (group C), utilizing cone-beam computed tomography images, immediately and 150 days post-surgery. A histological study was performed to evaluate bone formation in group C. No adverse events were observed. In the collagen group, the absorbed ratios of the augmented bone were 40.9 ± 36.7%, 29.4 ± 30.1%, and 11.1 ± 22.0% at 1, 3, and 6 mm, respectively; the ratio at 6 mm was significantly lower than that at 1 mm (p = 0.0442). In the P(LA/CL) group, those were 26.2 ± 27.3%, 17.1 ± 19.7%, and 13.3 ± 16.4% at 1, 3, and 6 mm, respectively, with no significant difference at each point. No significant inter-membrane differences were observed. The bone augmentation potential of the P(LA/CL) membrane matched that of the collagen membrane. P(LA/CL) could be used as a safe and effective membrane in GBR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10532217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105322172023-09-28 A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration Shido, Rena Ohba, Seigo Tominaga, Risa Sumita, Yoshinori Asahina, Izumi J Clin Med Article Biodegradable guided bone regeneration (GBR) membranes consist primarily of collagen and aliphatic polyesters. This study assessed the comparative efficacy of a poly(l-lactic-caprolactone) [P(LA/CL)] membrane versus that of a collagen membrane in GBR. Patients requiring GBR simultaneously or before dental implant placement in edentulous regions were randomly assigned to one of two membranes. Within each membrane, they were subdivided into 3 groups: dental implants were placed simultaneously with GBR in groups A and B, and 180 days post-GBR in group C. The augmented bone width was measured at 1, 3, and 6 mm from the implant’s neck (groups A and B) or the reference line (group C), utilizing cone-beam computed tomography images, immediately and 150 days post-surgery. A histological study was performed to evaluate bone formation in group C. No adverse events were observed. In the collagen group, the absorbed ratios of the augmented bone were 40.9 ± 36.7%, 29.4 ± 30.1%, and 11.1 ± 22.0% at 1, 3, and 6 mm, respectively; the ratio at 6 mm was significantly lower than that at 1 mm (p = 0.0442). In the P(LA/CL) group, those were 26.2 ± 27.3%, 17.1 ± 19.7%, and 13.3 ± 16.4% at 1, 3, and 6 mm, respectively, with no significant difference at each point. No significant inter-membrane differences were observed. The bone augmentation potential of the P(LA/CL) membrane matched that of the collagen membrane. P(LA/CL) could be used as a safe and effective membrane in GBR. MDPI 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10532217/ /pubmed/37762935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185994 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shido, Rena
Ohba, Seigo
Tominaga, Risa
Sumita, Yoshinori
Asahina, Izumi
A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_full A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_fullStr A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_short A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_sort prospective study of the assessment of the efficacy of a biodegradable poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) membrane for guided bone regeneration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10532217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37762935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185994
work_keys_str_mv AT shidorena aprospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT ohbaseigo aprospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT tominagarisa aprospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT sumitayoshinori aprospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT asahinaizumi aprospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT shidorena prospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT ohbaseigo prospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT tominagarisa prospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT sumitayoshinori prospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT asahinaizumi prospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration