Cargando…
A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
Biodegradable guided bone regeneration (GBR) membranes consist primarily of collagen and aliphatic polyesters. This study assessed the comparative efficacy of a poly(l-lactic-caprolactone) [P(LA/CL)] membrane versus that of a collagen membrane in GBR. Patients requiring GBR simultaneously or before...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10532217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37762935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185994 |
_version_ | 1785111903955058688 |
---|---|
author | Shido, Rena Ohba, Seigo Tominaga, Risa Sumita, Yoshinori Asahina, Izumi |
author_facet | Shido, Rena Ohba, Seigo Tominaga, Risa Sumita, Yoshinori Asahina, Izumi |
author_sort | Shido, Rena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biodegradable guided bone regeneration (GBR) membranes consist primarily of collagen and aliphatic polyesters. This study assessed the comparative efficacy of a poly(l-lactic-caprolactone) [P(LA/CL)] membrane versus that of a collagen membrane in GBR. Patients requiring GBR simultaneously or before dental implant placement in edentulous regions were randomly assigned to one of two membranes. Within each membrane, they were subdivided into 3 groups: dental implants were placed simultaneously with GBR in groups A and B, and 180 days post-GBR in group C. The augmented bone width was measured at 1, 3, and 6 mm from the implant’s neck (groups A and B) or the reference line (group C), utilizing cone-beam computed tomography images, immediately and 150 days post-surgery. A histological study was performed to evaluate bone formation in group C. No adverse events were observed. In the collagen group, the absorbed ratios of the augmented bone were 40.9 ± 36.7%, 29.4 ± 30.1%, and 11.1 ± 22.0% at 1, 3, and 6 mm, respectively; the ratio at 6 mm was significantly lower than that at 1 mm (p = 0.0442). In the P(LA/CL) group, those were 26.2 ± 27.3%, 17.1 ± 19.7%, and 13.3 ± 16.4% at 1, 3, and 6 mm, respectively, with no significant difference at each point. No significant inter-membrane differences were observed. The bone augmentation potential of the P(LA/CL) membrane matched that of the collagen membrane. P(LA/CL) could be used as a safe and effective membrane in GBR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10532217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105322172023-09-28 A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration Shido, Rena Ohba, Seigo Tominaga, Risa Sumita, Yoshinori Asahina, Izumi J Clin Med Article Biodegradable guided bone regeneration (GBR) membranes consist primarily of collagen and aliphatic polyesters. This study assessed the comparative efficacy of a poly(l-lactic-caprolactone) [P(LA/CL)] membrane versus that of a collagen membrane in GBR. Patients requiring GBR simultaneously or before dental implant placement in edentulous regions were randomly assigned to one of two membranes. Within each membrane, they were subdivided into 3 groups: dental implants were placed simultaneously with GBR in groups A and B, and 180 days post-GBR in group C. The augmented bone width was measured at 1, 3, and 6 mm from the implant’s neck (groups A and B) or the reference line (group C), utilizing cone-beam computed tomography images, immediately and 150 days post-surgery. A histological study was performed to evaluate bone formation in group C. No adverse events were observed. In the collagen group, the absorbed ratios of the augmented bone were 40.9 ± 36.7%, 29.4 ± 30.1%, and 11.1 ± 22.0% at 1, 3, and 6 mm, respectively; the ratio at 6 mm was significantly lower than that at 1 mm (p = 0.0442). In the P(LA/CL) group, those were 26.2 ± 27.3%, 17.1 ± 19.7%, and 13.3 ± 16.4% at 1, 3, and 6 mm, respectively, with no significant difference at each point. No significant inter-membrane differences were observed. The bone augmentation potential of the P(LA/CL) membrane matched that of the collagen membrane. P(LA/CL) could be used as a safe and effective membrane in GBR. MDPI 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10532217/ /pubmed/37762935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185994 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shido, Rena Ohba, Seigo Tominaga, Risa Sumita, Yoshinori Asahina, Izumi A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration |
title | A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration |
title_full | A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration |
title_fullStr | A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration |
title_short | A Prospective Study of the Assessment of the Efficacy of a Biodegradable Poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration |
title_sort | prospective study of the assessment of the efficacy of a biodegradable poly(l-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) membrane for guided bone regeneration |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10532217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37762935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185994 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shidorena aprospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration AT ohbaseigo aprospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration AT tominagarisa aprospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration AT sumitayoshinori aprospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration AT asahinaizumi aprospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration AT shidorena prospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration AT ohbaseigo prospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration AT tominagarisa prospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration AT sumitayoshinori prospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration AT asahinaizumi prospectivestudyoftheassessmentoftheefficacyofabiodegradablepolyllacticacidecaprolactonemembraneforguidedboneregeneration |