Cargando…
Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods
Colorectal cancer is one of the leading death causes worldwide, but, fortunately, early detection highly increases survival rates, with the adenoma detection rate being one surrogate marker for colonoscopy quality. Artificial intelligence and deep learning methods have been applied with great succes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10532435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754931 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9090167 |
_version_ | 1785111959748739072 |
---|---|
author | Sánchez-Peralta, Luisa F. Glover, Ben Saratxaga, Cristina L. Ortega-Morán, Juan Francisco Nazarian, Scarlet Picón, Artzai Pagador, J. Blas Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco M. |
author_facet | Sánchez-Peralta, Luisa F. Glover, Ben Saratxaga, Cristina L. Ortega-Morán, Juan Francisco Nazarian, Scarlet Picón, Artzai Pagador, J. Blas Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco M. |
author_sort | Sánchez-Peralta, Luisa F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Colorectal cancer is one of the leading death causes worldwide, but, fortunately, early detection highly increases survival rates, with the adenoma detection rate being one surrogate marker for colonoscopy quality. Artificial intelligence and deep learning methods have been applied with great success to improve polyp detection and localization and, therefore, the adenoma detection rate. In this regard, a comparison with clinical experts is required to prove the added value of the systems. Nevertheless, there is no standardized comparison in a laboratory setting before their clinical validation. The ClinExpPICCOLO comprises 65 unedited endoscopic images that represent the clinical setting. They include white light imaging and narrow band imaging, with one third of the images containing a lesion but, differently to another public datasets, the lesion does not appear well-centered in the image. Together with the dataset, an expert clinical performance baseline has been established with the performance of 146 gastroenterologists, who were required to locate the lesions in the selected images. Results shows statistically significant differences between experience groups. Expert gastroenterologists’ accuracy was 77.74, while sensitivity and specificity were 86.47 and 74.33, respectively. These values can be established as minimum values for a DL method before performing a clinical trial in the hospital setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10532435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105324352023-09-28 Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods Sánchez-Peralta, Luisa F. Glover, Ben Saratxaga, Cristina L. Ortega-Morán, Juan Francisco Nazarian, Scarlet Picón, Artzai Pagador, J. Blas Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco M. J Imaging Article Colorectal cancer is one of the leading death causes worldwide, but, fortunately, early detection highly increases survival rates, with the adenoma detection rate being one surrogate marker for colonoscopy quality. Artificial intelligence and deep learning methods have been applied with great success to improve polyp detection and localization and, therefore, the adenoma detection rate. In this regard, a comparison with clinical experts is required to prove the added value of the systems. Nevertheless, there is no standardized comparison in a laboratory setting before their clinical validation. The ClinExpPICCOLO comprises 65 unedited endoscopic images that represent the clinical setting. They include white light imaging and narrow band imaging, with one third of the images containing a lesion but, differently to another public datasets, the lesion does not appear well-centered in the image. Together with the dataset, an expert clinical performance baseline has been established with the performance of 146 gastroenterologists, who were required to locate the lesions in the selected images. Results shows statistically significant differences between experience groups. Expert gastroenterologists’ accuracy was 77.74, while sensitivity and specificity were 86.47 and 74.33, respectively. These values can be established as minimum values for a DL method before performing a clinical trial in the hospital setting. MDPI 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10532435/ /pubmed/37754931 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9090167 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sánchez-Peralta, Luisa F. Glover, Ben Saratxaga, Cristina L. Ortega-Morán, Juan Francisco Nazarian, Scarlet Picón, Artzai Pagador, J. Blas Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco M. Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods |
title | Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods |
title_full | Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods |
title_fullStr | Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods |
title_short | Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods |
title_sort | clinical validation benchmark dataset and expert performance baseline for colorectal polyp localization methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10532435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754931 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9090167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanchezperaltaluisaf clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods AT gloverben clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods AT saratxagacristinal clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods AT ortegamoranjuanfrancisco clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods AT nazarianscarlet clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods AT piconartzai clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods AT pagadorjblas clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods AT sanchezmargallofranciscom clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods |