Cargando…

Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading death causes worldwide, but, fortunately, early detection highly increases survival rates, with the adenoma detection rate being one surrogate marker for colonoscopy quality. Artificial intelligence and deep learning methods have been applied with great succes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez-Peralta, Luisa F., Glover, Ben, Saratxaga, Cristina L., Ortega-Morán, Juan Francisco, Nazarian, Scarlet, Picón, Artzai, Pagador, J. Blas, Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10532435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754931
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9090167
_version_ 1785111959748739072
author Sánchez-Peralta, Luisa F.
Glover, Ben
Saratxaga, Cristina L.
Ortega-Morán, Juan Francisco
Nazarian, Scarlet
Picón, Artzai
Pagador, J. Blas
Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
author_facet Sánchez-Peralta, Luisa F.
Glover, Ben
Saratxaga, Cristina L.
Ortega-Morán, Juan Francisco
Nazarian, Scarlet
Picón, Artzai
Pagador, J. Blas
Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
author_sort Sánchez-Peralta, Luisa F.
collection PubMed
description Colorectal cancer is one of the leading death causes worldwide, but, fortunately, early detection highly increases survival rates, with the adenoma detection rate being one surrogate marker for colonoscopy quality. Artificial intelligence and deep learning methods have been applied with great success to improve polyp detection and localization and, therefore, the adenoma detection rate. In this regard, a comparison with clinical experts is required to prove the added value of the systems. Nevertheless, there is no standardized comparison in a laboratory setting before their clinical validation. The ClinExpPICCOLO comprises 65 unedited endoscopic images that represent the clinical setting. They include white light imaging and narrow band imaging, with one third of the images containing a lesion but, differently to another public datasets, the lesion does not appear well-centered in the image. Together with the dataset, an expert clinical performance baseline has been established with the performance of 146 gastroenterologists, who were required to locate the lesions in the selected images. Results shows statistically significant differences between experience groups. Expert gastroenterologists’ accuracy was 77.74, while sensitivity and specificity were 86.47 and 74.33, respectively. These values can be established as minimum values for a DL method before performing a clinical trial in the hospital setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10532435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105324352023-09-28 Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods Sánchez-Peralta, Luisa F. Glover, Ben Saratxaga, Cristina L. Ortega-Morán, Juan Francisco Nazarian, Scarlet Picón, Artzai Pagador, J. Blas Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco M. J Imaging Article Colorectal cancer is one of the leading death causes worldwide, but, fortunately, early detection highly increases survival rates, with the adenoma detection rate being one surrogate marker for colonoscopy quality. Artificial intelligence and deep learning methods have been applied with great success to improve polyp detection and localization and, therefore, the adenoma detection rate. In this regard, a comparison with clinical experts is required to prove the added value of the systems. Nevertheless, there is no standardized comparison in a laboratory setting before their clinical validation. The ClinExpPICCOLO comprises 65 unedited endoscopic images that represent the clinical setting. They include white light imaging and narrow band imaging, with one third of the images containing a lesion but, differently to another public datasets, the lesion does not appear well-centered in the image. Together with the dataset, an expert clinical performance baseline has been established with the performance of 146 gastroenterologists, who were required to locate the lesions in the selected images. Results shows statistically significant differences between experience groups. Expert gastroenterologists’ accuracy was 77.74, while sensitivity and specificity were 86.47 and 74.33, respectively. These values can be established as minimum values for a DL method before performing a clinical trial in the hospital setting. MDPI 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10532435/ /pubmed/37754931 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9090167 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sánchez-Peralta, Luisa F.
Glover, Ben
Saratxaga, Cristina L.
Ortega-Morán, Juan Francisco
Nazarian, Scarlet
Picón, Artzai
Pagador, J. Blas
Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods
title Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods
title_full Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods
title_fullStr Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods
title_short Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods
title_sort clinical validation benchmark dataset and expert performance baseline for colorectal polyp localization methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10532435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37754931
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9090167
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezperaltaluisaf clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods
AT gloverben clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods
AT saratxagacristinal clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods
AT ortegamoranjuanfrancisco clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods
AT nazarianscarlet clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods
AT piconartzai clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods
AT pagadorjblas clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods
AT sanchezmargallofranciscom clinicalvalidationbenchmarkdatasetandexpertperformancebaselineforcolorectalpolyplocalizationmethods