Cargando…
Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer?
Prostate cancer is one of the most common tumors among the male population. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), standardized by the PI-RADS version 2.1 scoring system, has a fundamental role in detecting prostate cancer and evaluating its aggressiveness. Diffusion-weighted imaging sequences and appare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37763146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13091378 |
_version_ | 1785112095257264128 |
---|---|
author | Lucarelli, Nicola Maria Villanova, Ilaria Maggialetti, Nicola Greco, Sara Tarantino, Francesca Russo, Roberto Trabucco, Senia Maria Rosaria Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio Scardapane, Arnaldo |
author_facet | Lucarelli, Nicola Maria Villanova, Ilaria Maggialetti, Nicola Greco, Sara Tarantino, Francesca Russo, Roberto Trabucco, Senia Maria Rosaria Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio Scardapane, Arnaldo |
author_sort | Lucarelli, Nicola Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prostate cancer is one of the most common tumors among the male population. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), standardized by the PI-RADS version 2.1 scoring system, has a fundamental role in detecting prostate cancer and evaluating its aggressiveness. Diffusion-weighted imaging sequences and apparent diffusion coefficient values, in particular, are considered fundamental for the detection and characterization of lesions. In 2016 the International Society of Urological Pathology introduced a new anatomopathological 5-grade scoring system for prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) and PI-RADS groups. Our retrospective study included 143 patients with 154 suspicious lesions, observed on prostate magnetic resonance imaging and compared with the histological results of the biopsy. We observed that ADC values can aid in discriminating between not clinically significant (ISUP 1) and clinically significant (ISUP 2-5) prostate cancers. In fact, ADC values were lower in ISUP 5 lesions than in negative lesions. We also found a correlation between ADC values and PI-RADS groups; we noted lower ADC values in the PI-RADS 5 and PI-RADS 4 groups than in the PI-RADS 3 group. In conclusion, quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values can be useful to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10533005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105330052023-09-28 Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer? Lucarelli, Nicola Maria Villanova, Ilaria Maggialetti, Nicola Greco, Sara Tarantino, Francesca Russo, Roberto Trabucco, Senia Maria Rosaria Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio Scardapane, Arnaldo J Pers Med Article Prostate cancer is one of the most common tumors among the male population. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), standardized by the PI-RADS version 2.1 scoring system, has a fundamental role in detecting prostate cancer and evaluating its aggressiveness. Diffusion-weighted imaging sequences and apparent diffusion coefficient values, in particular, are considered fundamental for the detection and characterization of lesions. In 2016 the International Society of Urological Pathology introduced a new anatomopathological 5-grade scoring system for prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) and PI-RADS groups. Our retrospective study included 143 patients with 154 suspicious lesions, observed on prostate magnetic resonance imaging and compared with the histological results of the biopsy. We observed that ADC values can aid in discriminating between not clinically significant (ISUP 1) and clinically significant (ISUP 2-5) prostate cancers. In fact, ADC values were lower in ISUP 5 lesions than in negative lesions. We also found a correlation between ADC values and PI-RADS groups; we noted lower ADC values in the PI-RADS 5 and PI-RADS 4 groups than in the PI-RADS 3 group. In conclusion, quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values can be useful to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. MDPI 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10533005/ /pubmed/37763146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13091378 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lucarelli, Nicola Maria Villanova, Ilaria Maggialetti, Nicola Greco, Sara Tarantino, Francesca Russo, Roberto Trabucco, Senia Maria Rosaria Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio Scardapane, Arnaldo Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer? |
title | Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer? |
title_full | Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer? |
title_fullStr | Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer? |
title_short | Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer? |
title_sort | quantitative adc: an additional tool in the evaluation of prostate cancer? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37763146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13091378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucarellinicolamaria quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer AT villanovailaria quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer AT maggialettinicola quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer AT grecosara quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer AT tarantinofrancesca quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer AT russoroberto quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer AT trabuccoseniamariarosaria quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer AT stabileianoraamatoantonio quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer AT scardapanearnaldo quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer |