Cargando…

Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer?

Prostate cancer is one of the most common tumors among the male population. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), standardized by the PI-RADS version 2.1 scoring system, has a fundamental role in detecting prostate cancer and evaluating its aggressiveness. Diffusion-weighted imaging sequences and appare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucarelli, Nicola Maria, Villanova, Ilaria, Maggialetti, Nicola, Greco, Sara, Tarantino, Francesca, Russo, Roberto, Trabucco, Senia Maria Rosaria, Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio, Scardapane, Arnaldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37763146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13091378
_version_ 1785112095257264128
author Lucarelli, Nicola Maria
Villanova, Ilaria
Maggialetti, Nicola
Greco, Sara
Tarantino, Francesca
Russo, Roberto
Trabucco, Senia Maria Rosaria
Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio
Scardapane, Arnaldo
author_facet Lucarelli, Nicola Maria
Villanova, Ilaria
Maggialetti, Nicola
Greco, Sara
Tarantino, Francesca
Russo, Roberto
Trabucco, Senia Maria Rosaria
Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio
Scardapane, Arnaldo
author_sort Lucarelli, Nicola Maria
collection PubMed
description Prostate cancer is one of the most common tumors among the male population. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), standardized by the PI-RADS version 2.1 scoring system, has a fundamental role in detecting prostate cancer and evaluating its aggressiveness. Diffusion-weighted imaging sequences and apparent diffusion coefficient values, in particular, are considered fundamental for the detection and characterization of lesions. In 2016 the International Society of Urological Pathology introduced a new anatomopathological 5-grade scoring system for prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) and PI-RADS groups. Our retrospective study included 143 patients with 154 suspicious lesions, observed on prostate magnetic resonance imaging and compared with the histological results of the biopsy. We observed that ADC values can aid in discriminating between not clinically significant (ISUP 1) and clinically significant (ISUP 2-5) prostate cancers. In fact, ADC values were lower in ISUP 5 lesions than in negative lesions. We also found a correlation between ADC values and PI-RADS groups; we noted lower ADC values in the PI-RADS 5 and PI-RADS 4 groups than in the PI-RADS 3 group. In conclusion, quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values can be useful to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10533005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105330052023-09-28 Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer? Lucarelli, Nicola Maria Villanova, Ilaria Maggialetti, Nicola Greco, Sara Tarantino, Francesca Russo, Roberto Trabucco, Senia Maria Rosaria Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio Scardapane, Arnaldo J Pers Med Article Prostate cancer is one of the most common tumors among the male population. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), standardized by the PI-RADS version 2.1 scoring system, has a fundamental role in detecting prostate cancer and evaluating its aggressiveness. Diffusion-weighted imaging sequences and apparent diffusion coefficient values, in particular, are considered fundamental for the detection and characterization of lesions. In 2016 the International Society of Urological Pathology introduced a new anatomopathological 5-grade scoring system for prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) and PI-RADS groups. Our retrospective study included 143 patients with 154 suspicious lesions, observed on prostate magnetic resonance imaging and compared with the histological results of the biopsy. We observed that ADC values can aid in discriminating between not clinically significant (ISUP 1) and clinically significant (ISUP 2-5) prostate cancers. In fact, ADC values were lower in ISUP 5 lesions than in negative lesions. We also found a correlation between ADC values and PI-RADS groups; we noted lower ADC values in the PI-RADS 5 and PI-RADS 4 groups than in the PI-RADS 3 group. In conclusion, quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values can be useful to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. MDPI 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10533005/ /pubmed/37763146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13091378 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lucarelli, Nicola Maria
Villanova, Ilaria
Maggialetti, Nicola
Greco, Sara
Tarantino, Francesca
Russo, Roberto
Trabucco, Senia Maria Rosaria
Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio
Scardapane, Arnaldo
Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer?
title Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer?
title_full Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer?
title_fullStr Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer?
title_short Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer?
title_sort quantitative adc: an additional tool in the evaluation of prostate cancer?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37763146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13091378
work_keys_str_mv AT lucarellinicolamaria quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer
AT villanovailaria quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer
AT maggialettinicola quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer
AT grecosara quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer
AT tarantinofrancesca quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer
AT russoroberto quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer
AT trabuccoseniamariarosaria quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer
AT stabileianoraamatoantonio quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer
AT scardapanearnaldo quantitativeadcanadditionaltoolintheevaluationofprostatecancer