Cargando…
Why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with SCARLET
The Sepsis Coagulopathy Asahi Recombinant LE Thrombomodulin (SCARLET) trial has many defects, and thus cannot be the terminator of recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM). On the contrary, it provides sufficient evidence for further research. Based on analysis focusing on the failure of SCARLET and several...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37321903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.04.006 |
_version_ | 1785112205617790976 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Jian-Ying Lin, Hong-Yuan |
author_facet | Guo, Jian-Ying Lin, Hong-Yuan |
author_sort | Guo, Jian-Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Sepsis Coagulopathy Asahi Recombinant LE Thrombomodulin (SCARLET) trial has many defects, and thus cannot be the terminator of recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM). On the contrary, it provides sufficient evidence for further research. Based on analysis focusing on the failure of SCARLET and several previous anticoagulant studies, it is most important for new studies to grasp the following two points: (1) The enrolled cases should have sufficient disease severity and a clear standard for disseminated intravascular coagulation; (2) Heparin should not be used in combination with the investigated drugs. Multiple post-hoc analyses show that no combination of heparin will not increase the risk of thromboembolism. In fact, the combination of heparin can mask the true efficacy of the investigated drug. Due to the complexity of sepsis treatment and the limitations of clinical studies, the results of all treatment studies should be repeatedly verified, rather than be determined at one stroke. Some research conclusions contrary to disease physiology, pharmacology and clinical practice may be deceptive, and should be cautious rather than be simply accepted. On the other hand, the dissenting voices in the “consensus” scene are often well discussed by the authors and should be highly valued. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10533541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105335412023-09-29 Why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with SCARLET Guo, Jian-Ying Lin, Hong-Yuan Chin J Traumatol Short Communication The Sepsis Coagulopathy Asahi Recombinant LE Thrombomodulin (SCARLET) trial has many defects, and thus cannot be the terminator of recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM). On the contrary, it provides sufficient evidence for further research. Based on analysis focusing on the failure of SCARLET and several previous anticoagulant studies, it is most important for new studies to grasp the following two points: (1) The enrolled cases should have sufficient disease severity and a clear standard for disseminated intravascular coagulation; (2) Heparin should not be used in combination with the investigated drugs. Multiple post-hoc analyses show that no combination of heparin will not increase the risk of thromboembolism. In fact, the combination of heparin can mask the true efficacy of the investigated drug. Due to the complexity of sepsis treatment and the limitations of clinical studies, the results of all treatment studies should be repeatedly verified, rather than be determined at one stroke. Some research conclusions contrary to disease physiology, pharmacology and clinical practice may be deceptive, and should be cautious rather than be simply accepted. On the other hand, the dissenting voices in the “consensus” scene are often well discussed by the authors and should be highly valued. Elsevier 2023-09 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10533541/ /pubmed/37321903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.04.006 Text en © 2023 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Medical Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Guo, Jian-Ying Lin, Hong-Yuan Why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with SCARLET |
title | Why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with SCARLET |
title_full | Why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with SCARLET |
title_fullStr | Why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with SCARLET |
title_full_unstemmed | Why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with SCARLET |
title_short | Why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with SCARLET |
title_sort | why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with scarlet |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37321903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.04.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guojianying whyanticoagulantstudiesonsepsisfailfrequentlystartwithscarlet AT linhongyuan whyanticoagulantstudiesonsepsisfailfrequentlystartwithscarlet |