Cargando…
Improved patient-reported outcomes after open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared to anterior Lichtenstein repair: 10-year ACHQC analysis
INTRODUCTION: The Lichtenstein repair has been synonymous with “open” inguinal hernia repair (IHR) for 40 years. However, international guidelines have suggested that posterior mesh placement results in advantageous biomechanics and reduced risk of nerve-related chronic pain. Additionally, the use o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02852-6 |
_version_ | 1785112218727088128 |
---|---|
author | Agarwal, Divyansh Bharani, Tina Fullington, Nora Ott, Lauren Olson, Molly Poulose, Benjamin Warren, Jeremy Reinhorn, Michael |
author_facet | Agarwal, Divyansh Bharani, Tina Fullington, Nora Ott, Lauren Olson, Molly Poulose, Benjamin Warren, Jeremy Reinhorn, Michael |
author_sort | Agarwal, Divyansh |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Lichtenstein repair has been synonymous with “open” inguinal hernia repair (IHR) for 40 years. However, international guidelines have suggested that posterior mesh placement results in advantageous biomechanics and reduced risk of nerve-related chronic pain. Additionally, the use of local anesthetics has been shown to reduce postoperative pain and complication risks. An open transrectus preperitoneal/open preperitoneal (TREPP/OPP) repair combines posterior mesh placement with the use of local anesthetic and as such could be the ideal repair for primary inguinal hernia. Using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry, we compared open anterior mesh with open posterior mesh repairs. METHODS: We performed a propensity score matched analysis of patients undergoing open IHR between 2012 and 2022 in the ACHQC. After 1:1 optimal matching, both the TREPP/OPP and Lichtenstein cohorts were balanced with 451 participants in each group. Outcomes included patient-reported quality of life (QoL), hernia recurrence, and postoperative opioid use. RESULTS: Improvement was seen after TREPP/OPP in EuraHS QoL score at 30 days (OR 0.558 [0.408, 0.761]; p = 0.001), and the difference persisted at 1 year (OR 0.588 [0.346, 0.994]; p = 0.047). Patient-reported opioid use at 30-day follow-up was significantly lower in the TREPP/OPP cohort (OR 0.31 [0.20, 0.48]; p < 0.001). 30-day frequency of surgical-site occurrences was significantly higher in the Lichtenstein repair cohort (OR 0.22 [0.06–0.61]; p = 0.007). There were no statistically significant differences in hernia recurrence risk at 1 year, or rates of postoperative bleeding, peripheral nerve injury, DVTs, or UTIs. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrates a benefit of posterior mesh placement (TREPP/OPP) over anterior mesh placement (Lichtenstein) in open inguinal hernia repair in patient-reported QoL and reduced opioid use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10533599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Paris |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105335992023-09-29 Improved patient-reported outcomes after open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared to anterior Lichtenstein repair: 10-year ACHQC analysis Agarwal, Divyansh Bharani, Tina Fullington, Nora Ott, Lauren Olson, Molly Poulose, Benjamin Warren, Jeremy Reinhorn, Michael Hernia Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Lichtenstein repair has been synonymous with “open” inguinal hernia repair (IHR) for 40 years. However, international guidelines have suggested that posterior mesh placement results in advantageous biomechanics and reduced risk of nerve-related chronic pain. Additionally, the use of local anesthetics has been shown to reduce postoperative pain and complication risks. An open transrectus preperitoneal/open preperitoneal (TREPP/OPP) repair combines posterior mesh placement with the use of local anesthetic and as such could be the ideal repair for primary inguinal hernia. Using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry, we compared open anterior mesh with open posterior mesh repairs. METHODS: We performed a propensity score matched analysis of patients undergoing open IHR between 2012 and 2022 in the ACHQC. After 1:1 optimal matching, both the TREPP/OPP and Lichtenstein cohorts were balanced with 451 participants in each group. Outcomes included patient-reported quality of life (QoL), hernia recurrence, and postoperative opioid use. RESULTS: Improvement was seen after TREPP/OPP in EuraHS QoL score at 30 days (OR 0.558 [0.408, 0.761]; p = 0.001), and the difference persisted at 1 year (OR 0.588 [0.346, 0.994]; p = 0.047). Patient-reported opioid use at 30-day follow-up was significantly lower in the TREPP/OPP cohort (OR 0.31 [0.20, 0.48]; p < 0.001). 30-day frequency of surgical-site occurrences was significantly higher in the Lichtenstein repair cohort (OR 0.22 [0.06–0.61]; p = 0.007). There were no statistically significant differences in hernia recurrence risk at 1 year, or rates of postoperative bleeding, peripheral nerve injury, DVTs, or UTIs. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrates a benefit of posterior mesh placement (TREPP/OPP) over anterior mesh placement (Lichtenstein) in open inguinal hernia repair in patient-reported QoL and reduced opioid use. Springer Paris 2023-08-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10533599/ /pubmed/37553502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02852-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Agarwal, Divyansh Bharani, Tina Fullington, Nora Ott, Lauren Olson, Molly Poulose, Benjamin Warren, Jeremy Reinhorn, Michael Improved patient-reported outcomes after open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared to anterior Lichtenstein repair: 10-year ACHQC analysis |
title | Improved patient-reported outcomes after open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared to anterior Lichtenstein repair: 10-year ACHQC analysis |
title_full | Improved patient-reported outcomes after open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared to anterior Lichtenstein repair: 10-year ACHQC analysis |
title_fullStr | Improved patient-reported outcomes after open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared to anterior Lichtenstein repair: 10-year ACHQC analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Improved patient-reported outcomes after open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared to anterior Lichtenstein repair: 10-year ACHQC analysis |
title_short | Improved patient-reported outcomes after open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared to anterior Lichtenstein repair: 10-year ACHQC analysis |
title_sort | improved patient-reported outcomes after open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared to anterior lichtenstein repair: 10-year achqc analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02852-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agarwaldivyansh improvedpatientreportedoutcomesafteropenpreperitonealinguinalherniarepaircomparedtoanteriorlichtensteinrepair10yearachqcanalysis AT bharanitina improvedpatientreportedoutcomesafteropenpreperitonealinguinalherniarepaircomparedtoanteriorlichtensteinrepair10yearachqcanalysis AT fullingtonnora improvedpatientreportedoutcomesafteropenpreperitonealinguinalherniarepaircomparedtoanteriorlichtensteinrepair10yearachqcanalysis AT ottlauren improvedpatientreportedoutcomesafteropenpreperitonealinguinalherniarepaircomparedtoanteriorlichtensteinrepair10yearachqcanalysis AT olsonmolly improvedpatientreportedoutcomesafteropenpreperitonealinguinalherniarepaircomparedtoanteriorlichtensteinrepair10yearachqcanalysis AT poulosebenjamin improvedpatientreportedoutcomesafteropenpreperitonealinguinalherniarepaircomparedtoanteriorlichtensteinrepair10yearachqcanalysis AT warrenjeremy improvedpatientreportedoutcomesafteropenpreperitonealinguinalherniarepaircomparedtoanteriorlichtensteinrepair10yearachqcanalysis AT reinhornmichael improvedpatientreportedoutcomesafteropenpreperitonealinguinalherniarepaircomparedtoanteriorlichtensteinrepair10yearachqcanalysis |