Cargando…

Cost–benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data

BACKGROUND: Providing adequate medical care to nursing home residents is challenging. Transfers to emergency departments are frequent, although often avoidable. We conducted the complex CoCare intervention with the aim to optimize nursing staff–physician collaboration to reduce avoidable hospital ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brühmann, Boris A., Kaier, Klaus, von der Warth, Rieka, Farin-Glattacker, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36481830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01546-7
_version_ 1785112240322510848
author Brühmann, Boris A.
Kaier, Klaus
von der Warth, Rieka
Farin-Glattacker, Erik
author_facet Brühmann, Boris A.
Kaier, Klaus
von der Warth, Rieka
Farin-Glattacker, Erik
author_sort Brühmann, Boris A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Providing adequate medical care to nursing home residents is challenging. Transfers to emergency departments are frequent, although often avoidable. We conducted the complex CoCare intervention with the aim to optimize nursing staff–physician collaboration to reduce avoidable hospital admissions and ambulance transportations, thereby reducing costs. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized study, based on German insurance data, includes residents in nursing homes. Health care cost from a payer perspective and cost–savings of such a complex intervention were investigated. The utilisation of services after implementation of the intervention was compared with services in previous quarters as well as services in the control group. To compensate for remaining differences in resident characteristics between intervention and control group, a propensity score was determined and adjusted for in the regression analyses. RESULTS: The study population included 1240 residents in the intervention and 7552 in the control group. Total costs of medical services utilisation were reduced by €468.56 (p < 0.001) per resident and quarter in the intervention group. Hospital stays were reduced by 0.08 (p = 0.001) and patient transports by 0.19 (p = 0.049). This led to 1.66 (p < 0.001) avoided hospital days or €621.37 (p < 0.001) in costs–savings of inpatient services. More services were billed by general practitioners in the intervention group, which led to additional costs of €97.89 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The benefits of our intervention clearly exceed its costs. In the intervention group, avoided hospital admissions led to additional outpatient billing. This indicates that such a multifactorial intervention program can be cost-saving and improve medical care in long-term care homes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-022-01546-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10533715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105337152023-09-29 Cost–benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data Brühmann, Boris A. Kaier, Klaus von der Warth, Rieka Farin-Glattacker, Erik Eur J Health Econ Original Paper BACKGROUND: Providing adequate medical care to nursing home residents is challenging. Transfers to emergency departments are frequent, although often avoidable. We conducted the complex CoCare intervention with the aim to optimize nursing staff–physician collaboration to reduce avoidable hospital admissions and ambulance transportations, thereby reducing costs. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized study, based on German insurance data, includes residents in nursing homes. Health care cost from a payer perspective and cost–savings of such a complex intervention were investigated. The utilisation of services after implementation of the intervention was compared with services in previous quarters as well as services in the control group. To compensate for remaining differences in resident characteristics between intervention and control group, a propensity score was determined and adjusted for in the regression analyses. RESULTS: The study population included 1240 residents in the intervention and 7552 in the control group. Total costs of medical services utilisation were reduced by €468.56 (p < 0.001) per resident and quarter in the intervention group. Hospital stays were reduced by 0.08 (p = 0.001) and patient transports by 0.19 (p = 0.049). This led to 1.66 (p < 0.001) avoided hospital days or €621.37 (p < 0.001) in costs–savings of inpatient services. More services were billed by general practitioners in the intervention group, which led to additional costs of €97.89 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The benefits of our intervention clearly exceed its costs. In the intervention group, avoided hospital admissions led to additional outpatient billing. This indicates that such a multifactorial intervention program can be cost-saving and improve medical care in long-term care homes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-022-01546-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10533715/ /pubmed/36481830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01546-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Brühmann, Boris A.
Kaier, Klaus
von der Warth, Rieka
Farin-Glattacker, Erik
Cost–benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data
title Cost–benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data
title_full Cost–benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data
title_fullStr Cost–benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data
title_full_unstemmed Cost–benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data
title_short Cost–benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data
title_sort cost–benefit analysis of the cocare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36481830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01546-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bruhmannborisa costbenefitanalysisofthecocareinterventiontoimprovemedicalcareinlongtermcarenursinghomesananalysisbasedonclaimsdata
AT kaierklaus costbenefitanalysisofthecocareinterventiontoimprovemedicalcareinlongtermcarenursinghomesananalysisbasedonclaimsdata
AT vonderwarthrieka costbenefitanalysisofthecocareinterventiontoimprovemedicalcareinlongtermcarenursinghomesananalysisbasedonclaimsdata
AT faringlattackererik costbenefitanalysisofthecocareinterventiontoimprovemedicalcareinlongtermcarenursinghomesananalysisbasedonclaimsdata