Cargando…
Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Despite of recent advancement in the burns wound management, burn wound infection (BWI) is still one of the major cause of burns mortality. Patients who survive their burns injury still suffers from BWI related complication like delayed wound healing and poor scarring. BWI has been tre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37748846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058006 |
_version_ | 1785112249841483776 |
---|---|
author | Imran, Rizwana Hassouna, Tarek Sur, Gurneet Casey, Anna Homer, Victoria Barton, Darren Brock, Kristian Altarrah, Khaled Moiemen, Naiem |
author_facet | Imran, Rizwana Hassouna, Tarek Sur, Gurneet Casey, Anna Homer, Victoria Barton, Darren Brock, Kristian Altarrah, Khaled Moiemen, Naiem |
author_sort | Imran, Rizwana |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite of recent advancement in the burns wound management, burn wound infection (BWI) is still one of the major cause of burns mortality. Patients who survive their burns injury still suffers from BWI related complication like delayed wound healing and poor scarring. BWI has been treated by application of topical antimicrobial agents or systemic antibiotics. Due to the global risk of developing systemic antibiotics resistance, medical research focuses on identifying single topical agent which has effective antimicrobial activity, easily available and cost effective. One such agent is acetic acid (AA). AA has been used as a topical antibacterial agent for the treatment of burns wounds for many years and has shown to have activity against gram-negative organisms including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. So far there has been no consensus on optimal concentration that has effective antimicrobial activity, frequency of application, duration of treatment and most importantly good patient’s tolerability. A randomised control study is required to answer all these questions. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of 0.5% and 2% of AA when applied to colonised burns wounds for 3 days after admittance to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a double-blinded, prospective, randomised, controlled, single-centre trial. Patients will be screened for eligibility in the inpatient area and those who are found to be eligible will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: group 1: 0.5% AA (10 patients); group 2: 2% AA (10 patients); total number: 20 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: Efficacy will be assessed by measuring the bacterial load from microbiology wound swabs for three consecutive days. Secondary outcomes: (1) The assessment of antimicrobial activity of AA and the minimum inhibitory concentrations. (2) Patient’s tolerance by assessing Visual Analogue Scale pain score. (3) Time to 95% wound healing of treatment area. (4) Patient’s perceived treatment allocation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: AceticA trial protocol was approved by the National Research Ethics Service (West Midlands—Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee; 17/WM/0407; IRAS 234132). This article refers to protocol version 5.0 dated 6 July 2020. The analysed results will be presented at national and international conferences related to management of burn patients. The generated articles based on the trial results will be submitted to peer review journals for publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11636684. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10533794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105337942023-09-29 Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial Imran, Rizwana Hassouna, Tarek Sur, Gurneet Casey, Anna Homer, Victoria Barton, Darren Brock, Kristian Altarrah, Khaled Moiemen, Naiem BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Despite of recent advancement in the burns wound management, burn wound infection (BWI) is still one of the major cause of burns mortality. Patients who survive their burns injury still suffers from BWI related complication like delayed wound healing and poor scarring. BWI has been treated by application of topical antimicrobial agents or systemic antibiotics. Due to the global risk of developing systemic antibiotics resistance, medical research focuses on identifying single topical agent which has effective antimicrobial activity, easily available and cost effective. One such agent is acetic acid (AA). AA has been used as a topical antibacterial agent for the treatment of burns wounds for many years and has shown to have activity against gram-negative organisms including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. So far there has been no consensus on optimal concentration that has effective antimicrobial activity, frequency of application, duration of treatment and most importantly good patient’s tolerability. A randomised control study is required to answer all these questions. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of 0.5% and 2% of AA when applied to colonised burns wounds for 3 days after admittance to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a double-blinded, prospective, randomised, controlled, single-centre trial. Patients will be screened for eligibility in the inpatient area and those who are found to be eligible will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: group 1: 0.5% AA (10 patients); group 2: 2% AA (10 patients); total number: 20 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: Efficacy will be assessed by measuring the bacterial load from microbiology wound swabs for three consecutive days. Secondary outcomes: (1) The assessment of antimicrobial activity of AA and the minimum inhibitory concentrations. (2) Patient’s tolerance by assessing Visual Analogue Scale pain score. (3) Time to 95% wound healing of treatment area. (4) Patient’s perceived treatment allocation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: AceticA trial protocol was approved by the National Research Ethics Service (West Midlands—Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee; 17/WM/0407; IRAS 234132). This article refers to protocol version 5.0 dated 6 July 2020. The analysed results will be presented at national and international conferences related to management of burn patients. The generated articles based on the trial results will be submitted to peer review journals for publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11636684. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10533794/ /pubmed/37748846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058006 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Surgery Imran, Rizwana Hassouna, Tarek Sur, Gurneet Casey, Anna Homer, Victoria Barton, Darren Brock, Kristian Altarrah, Khaled Moiemen, Naiem Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title | Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37748846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT imranrizwana efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hassounatarek efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT surgurneet efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT caseyanna efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT homervictoria efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bartondarren efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brockkristian efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT altarrahkhaled efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT moiemennaiem efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial |