Cargando…

Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Despite of recent advancement in the burns wound management, burn wound infection (BWI) is still one of the major cause of burns mortality. Patients who survive their burns injury still suffers from BWI related complication like delayed wound healing and poor scarring. BWI has been tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imran, Rizwana, Hassouna, Tarek, Sur, Gurneet, Casey, Anna, Homer, Victoria, Barton, Darren, Brock, Kristian, Altarrah, Khaled, Moiemen, Naiem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37748846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058006
_version_ 1785112249841483776
author Imran, Rizwana
Hassouna, Tarek
Sur, Gurneet
Casey, Anna
Homer, Victoria
Barton, Darren
Brock, Kristian
Altarrah, Khaled
Moiemen, Naiem
author_facet Imran, Rizwana
Hassouna, Tarek
Sur, Gurneet
Casey, Anna
Homer, Victoria
Barton, Darren
Brock, Kristian
Altarrah, Khaled
Moiemen, Naiem
author_sort Imran, Rizwana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite of recent advancement in the burns wound management, burn wound infection (BWI) is still one of the major cause of burns mortality. Patients who survive their burns injury still suffers from BWI related complication like delayed wound healing and poor scarring. BWI has been treated by application of topical antimicrobial agents or systemic antibiotics. Due to the global risk of developing systemic antibiotics resistance, medical research focuses on identifying single topical agent which has effective antimicrobial activity, easily available and cost effective. One such agent is acetic acid (AA). AA has been used as a topical antibacterial agent for the treatment of burns wounds for many years and has shown to have activity against gram-negative organisms including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. So far there has been no consensus on optimal concentration that has effective antimicrobial activity, frequency of application, duration of treatment and most importantly good patient’s tolerability. A randomised control study is required to answer all these questions. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of 0.5% and 2% of AA when applied to colonised burns wounds for 3 days after admittance to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a double-blinded, prospective, randomised, controlled, single-centre trial. Patients will be screened for eligibility in the inpatient area and those who are found to be eligible will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: group 1: 0.5% AA (10 patients); group 2: 2% AA (10 patients); total number: 20 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: Efficacy will be assessed by measuring the bacterial load from microbiology wound swabs for three consecutive days. Secondary outcomes: (1) The assessment of antimicrobial activity of AA and the minimum inhibitory concentrations. (2) Patient’s tolerance by assessing Visual Analogue Scale pain score. (3) Time to 95% wound healing of treatment area. (4) Patient’s perceived treatment allocation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: AceticA trial protocol was approved by the National Research Ethics Service (West Midlands—Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee; 17/WM/0407; IRAS 234132). This article refers to protocol version 5.0 dated 6 July 2020. The analysed results will be presented at national and international conferences related to management of burn patients. The generated articles based on the trial results will be submitted to peer review journals for publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11636684.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10533794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105337942023-09-29 Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial Imran, Rizwana Hassouna, Tarek Sur, Gurneet Casey, Anna Homer, Victoria Barton, Darren Brock, Kristian Altarrah, Khaled Moiemen, Naiem BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Despite of recent advancement in the burns wound management, burn wound infection (BWI) is still one of the major cause of burns mortality. Patients who survive their burns injury still suffers from BWI related complication like delayed wound healing and poor scarring. BWI has been treated by application of topical antimicrobial agents or systemic antibiotics. Due to the global risk of developing systemic antibiotics resistance, medical research focuses on identifying single topical agent which has effective antimicrobial activity, easily available and cost effective. One such agent is acetic acid (AA). AA has been used as a topical antibacterial agent for the treatment of burns wounds for many years and has shown to have activity against gram-negative organisms including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. So far there has been no consensus on optimal concentration that has effective antimicrobial activity, frequency of application, duration of treatment and most importantly good patient’s tolerability. A randomised control study is required to answer all these questions. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of 0.5% and 2% of AA when applied to colonised burns wounds for 3 days after admittance to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a double-blinded, prospective, randomised, controlled, single-centre trial. Patients will be screened for eligibility in the inpatient area and those who are found to be eligible will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: group 1: 0.5% AA (10 patients); group 2: 2% AA (10 patients); total number: 20 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: Efficacy will be assessed by measuring the bacterial load from microbiology wound swabs for three consecutive days. Secondary outcomes: (1) The assessment of antimicrobial activity of AA and the minimum inhibitory concentrations. (2) Patient’s tolerance by assessing Visual Analogue Scale pain score. (3) Time to 95% wound healing of treatment area. (4) Patient’s perceived treatment allocation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: AceticA trial protocol was approved by the National Research Ethics Service (West Midlands—Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee; 17/WM/0407; IRAS 234132). This article refers to protocol version 5.0 dated 6 July 2020. The analysed results will be presented at national and international conferences related to management of burn patients. The generated articles based on the trial results will be submitted to peer review journals for publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11636684. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10533794/ /pubmed/37748846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058006 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Imran, Rizwana
Hassouna, Tarek
Sur, Gurneet
Casey, Anna
Homer, Victoria
Barton, Darren
Brock, Kristian
Altarrah, Khaled
Moiemen, Naiem
Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_short Efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_sort efficacy and optimal dose of acetic acid to treat colonised burns wounds: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37748846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058006
work_keys_str_mv AT imranrizwana efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hassounatarek efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT surgurneet efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT caseyanna efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT homervictoria efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bartondarren efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brockkristian efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT altarrahkhaled efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT moiemennaiem efficacyandoptimaldoseofaceticacidtotreatcolonisedburnswoundsprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial