Cargando…

Upper airway angle and glottic height: a prospective cohort to evaluate two new features for airway prediction

BACKGROUND: Predicting difficult direct laryngoscopies remains challenging and improvements are needed in preoperative airway assessment. We conceived two new tests (the upper airway angle and the glottic height) and assessed their association with difficult direct laryngoscopies as well as their pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Carvalho, Clístenes Crístian, da Silva, Danielle Melo, Leite, Marina Sampaio, de Andrade, Lívia Barboza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35569581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2022.04.004
_version_ 1785112292242751488
author de Carvalho, Clístenes Crístian
da Silva, Danielle Melo
Leite, Marina Sampaio
de Andrade, Lívia Barboza
author_facet de Carvalho, Clístenes Crístian
da Silva, Danielle Melo
Leite, Marina Sampaio
de Andrade, Lívia Barboza
author_sort de Carvalho, Clístenes Crístian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Predicting difficult direct laryngoscopies remains challenging and improvements are needed in preoperative airway assessment. We conceived two new tests (the upper airway angle and the glottic height) and assessed their association with difficult direct laryngoscopies as well as their predictive performance. METHODS: A prospective cohort was conducted with 211 patients undergoing general anesthesia for surgical procedures. We assessed the association between difficult laryngoscopies and modified Mallampati Test (MMT), Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT), Mandibular Length (ML), Neck Circumference (NC), Mouth Opening (MO), Sternomental Distance (SMD), Thyromental Distance (TMD), Upper Airway Angle (UAA), and Glottic Height (GH). We also estimated their predictive values. RESULTS: Difficult laryngoscopy was presented by 12 patients (5.7%). Six tests were significantly associated with difficult laryngoscopies and their area under the ROC curve, and 95% CIs were as follows: UAA = 88.82 (81.86–95.78); GH = 86.43 (72.67–100); ML = 83.75 (72.77–94.74); NC = 79.17 (64.98–93.36); MO = 65.58 (45.13–86.02); and MMT = 77.89 (68.37–87.41). CONCLUSION: We have found two new features (the UAA and the GH) to be significantly associated with the occurrence of difficult direct laryngoscopies. They also presented the best predictive performance amongst the nine evaluated tests in our cohort of patients. We cannot ensure, however, these tests to be superior to other regularly used bedside tests based on our estimated 95% CIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10533972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105339722023-09-29 Upper airway angle and glottic height: a prospective cohort to evaluate two new features for airway prediction de Carvalho, Clístenes Crístian da Silva, Danielle Melo Leite, Marina Sampaio de Andrade, Lívia Barboza Braz J Anesthesiol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Predicting difficult direct laryngoscopies remains challenging and improvements are needed in preoperative airway assessment. We conceived two new tests (the upper airway angle and the glottic height) and assessed their association with difficult direct laryngoscopies as well as their predictive performance. METHODS: A prospective cohort was conducted with 211 patients undergoing general anesthesia for surgical procedures. We assessed the association between difficult laryngoscopies and modified Mallampati Test (MMT), Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT), Mandibular Length (ML), Neck Circumference (NC), Mouth Opening (MO), Sternomental Distance (SMD), Thyromental Distance (TMD), Upper Airway Angle (UAA), and Glottic Height (GH). We also estimated their predictive values. RESULTS: Difficult laryngoscopy was presented by 12 patients (5.7%). Six tests were significantly associated with difficult laryngoscopies and their area under the ROC curve, and 95% CIs were as follows: UAA = 88.82 (81.86–95.78); GH = 86.43 (72.67–100); ML = 83.75 (72.77–94.74); NC = 79.17 (64.98–93.36); MO = 65.58 (45.13–86.02); and MMT = 77.89 (68.37–87.41). CONCLUSION: We have found two new features (the UAA and the GH) to be significantly associated with the occurrence of difficult direct laryngoscopies. They also presented the best predictive performance amongst the nine evaluated tests in our cohort of patients. We cannot ensure, however, these tests to be superior to other regularly used bedside tests based on our estimated 95% CIs. Elsevier 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10533972/ /pubmed/35569581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2022.04.004 Text en © 2022 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Investigation
de Carvalho, Clístenes Crístian
da Silva, Danielle Melo
Leite, Marina Sampaio
de Andrade, Lívia Barboza
Upper airway angle and glottic height: a prospective cohort to evaluate two new features for airway prediction
title Upper airway angle and glottic height: a prospective cohort to evaluate two new features for airway prediction
title_full Upper airway angle and glottic height: a prospective cohort to evaluate two new features for airway prediction
title_fullStr Upper airway angle and glottic height: a prospective cohort to evaluate two new features for airway prediction
title_full_unstemmed Upper airway angle and glottic height: a prospective cohort to evaluate two new features for airway prediction
title_short Upper airway angle and glottic height: a prospective cohort to evaluate two new features for airway prediction
title_sort upper airway angle and glottic height: a prospective cohort to evaluate two new features for airway prediction
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35569581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2022.04.004
work_keys_str_mv AT decarvalhoclistenescristian upperairwayangleandglotticheightaprospectivecohorttoevaluatetwonewfeaturesforairwayprediction
AT dasilvadaniellemelo upperairwayangleandglotticheightaprospectivecohorttoevaluatetwonewfeaturesforairwayprediction
AT leitemarinasampaio upperairwayangleandglotticheightaprospectivecohorttoevaluatetwonewfeaturesforairwayprediction
AT deandradeliviabarboza upperairwayangleandglotticheightaprospectivecohorttoevaluatetwonewfeaturesforairwayprediction