Cargando…
Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction: Complicated diverticulitis is a common abdominal emergency that often requires a surgical intervention. The systematic review and meta-analysis below compare the benefits and harms of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery in patients with complicated colonic diverticular disease. Methods: T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37779579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1208611 |
_version_ | 1785112297773989888 |
---|---|
author | Panin, S. I. Nechay, T. V. Sazhin, A. V. Tyagunov, A. E. Shcherbakov, N. A. Bykov, A. V. Melnikov-Makarchuk, K. Yu Yuldashev, A. G. Kuznetsov, A. A. |
author_facet | Panin, S. I. Nechay, T. V. Sazhin, A. V. Tyagunov, A. E. Shcherbakov, N. A. Bykov, A. V. Melnikov-Makarchuk, K. Yu Yuldashev, A. G. Kuznetsov, A. A. |
author_sort | Panin, S. I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Complicated diverticulitis is a common abdominal emergency that often requires a surgical intervention. The systematic review and meta-analysis below compare the benefits and harms of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery in patients with complicated colonic diverticular disease. Methods: The following databases were searched before 1 March 2023: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The internal validity of the selected non-randomized studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed using RevMan 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) and Copenhagen Trial Unit Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) software (Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark), respectively. Results: We found no relevant randomized controlled trials in the searched databases. Therefore, we analyzed 5 non-randomized studies with satisfactory internal validity and similar designs comprising a total of 442 patients (184 (41.6%) robotic and 258 (58.4%) laparoscopic interventions). The analysis revealed that robotic surgery for complicated diverticulitis (CD) took longer than laparoscopy (MD = 42 min; 95% CI: [-16, 101]). No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups regarding intraoperative blood loss (MD = −9 mL; 95% CI: [–26, 8]) and the rate of conversion to open surgery (2.17% or 4/184 for robotic surgery vs. 6.59% or 17/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.63; 95% CI: [0.10, 4.00]). The type of surgery did not affect the length of in-hospital stay (MD = 0.18; 95% CI: [–0.60, 0.97]) or the rate of postoperative complications (14.1% or 26/184 for robotic surgery vs. 19.8% or 51/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.81; 95% CI: [0.52, 1.26]). No deaths were reported in either group. Discussion: The meta-analysis suggests that robotic surgery is an appropriate option for managing complicated diverticulitis. It is associated with a trend toward a lower rate of conversion to open surgery and fewer postoperative complications; however, this trend does not reach the level of statistical significance. Since no high quality RCTs were available, this meta-analysis isnot able to provide reliable conclusion, but only a remarkable lack of proper evidence supporting robotic technology. The need for further evidence-based trials is important. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10533995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105339952023-09-29 Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis Panin, S. I. Nechay, T. V. Sazhin, A. V. Tyagunov, A. E. Shcherbakov, N. A. Bykov, A. V. Melnikov-Makarchuk, K. Yu Yuldashev, A. G. Kuznetsov, A. A. Front Robot AI Robotics and AI Introduction: Complicated diverticulitis is a common abdominal emergency that often requires a surgical intervention. The systematic review and meta-analysis below compare the benefits and harms of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery in patients with complicated colonic diverticular disease. Methods: The following databases were searched before 1 March 2023: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The internal validity of the selected non-randomized studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed using RevMan 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) and Copenhagen Trial Unit Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) software (Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark), respectively. Results: We found no relevant randomized controlled trials in the searched databases. Therefore, we analyzed 5 non-randomized studies with satisfactory internal validity and similar designs comprising a total of 442 patients (184 (41.6%) robotic and 258 (58.4%) laparoscopic interventions). The analysis revealed that robotic surgery for complicated diverticulitis (CD) took longer than laparoscopy (MD = 42 min; 95% CI: [-16, 101]). No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups regarding intraoperative blood loss (MD = −9 mL; 95% CI: [–26, 8]) and the rate of conversion to open surgery (2.17% or 4/184 for robotic surgery vs. 6.59% or 17/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.63; 95% CI: [0.10, 4.00]). The type of surgery did not affect the length of in-hospital stay (MD = 0.18; 95% CI: [–0.60, 0.97]) or the rate of postoperative complications (14.1% or 26/184 for robotic surgery vs. 19.8% or 51/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.81; 95% CI: [0.52, 1.26]). No deaths were reported in either group. Discussion: The meta-analysis suggests that robotic surgery is an appropriate option for managing complicated diverticulitis. It is associated with a trend toward a lower rate of conversion to open surgery and fewer postoperative complications; however, this trend does not reach the level of statistical significance. Since no high quality RCTs were available, this meta-analysis isnot able to provide reliable conclusion, but only a remarkable lack of proper evidence supporting robotic technology. The need for further evidence-based trials is important. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10533995/ /pubmed/37779579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1208611 Text en Copyright © 2023 Panin, Nechay, Sazhin, Tyagunov, Shcherbakov, Bykov, Melnikov-Makarchuk, Yuldashev and Kuznetsov. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Robotics and AI Panin, S. I. Nechay, T. V. Sazhin, A. V. Tyagunov, A. E. Shcherbakov, N. A. Bykov, A. V. Melnikov-Makarchuk, K. Yu Yuldashev, A. G. Kuznetsov, A. A. Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? results of systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Robotics and AI |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37779579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1208611 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paninsi shouldweencouragetheuseofrobotictechnologiesincomplicateddiverticulitisresultsofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nechaytv shouldweencouragetheuseofrobotictechnologiesincomplicateddiverticulitisresultsofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sazhinav shouldweencouragetheuseofrobotictechnologiesincomplicateddiverticulitisresultsofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tyagunovae shouldweencouragetheuseofrobotictechnologiesincomplicateddiverticulitisresultsofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shcherbakovna shouldweencouragetheuseofrobotictechnologiesincomplicateddiverticulitisresultsofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bykovav shouldweencouragetheuseofrobotictechnologiesincomplicateddiverticulitisresultsofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT melnikovmakarchukkyu shouldweencouragetheuseofrobotictechnologiesincomplicateddiverticulitisresultsofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuldashevag shouldweencouragetheuseofrobotictechnologiesincomplicateddiverticulitisresultsofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kuznetsovaa shouldweencouragetheuseofrobotictechnologiesincomplicateddiverticulitisresultsofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |