Cargando…

Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Automation in radiotherapy treatment planning aims to improve both the quality and the efficiency of the process. The aim of this study was to report on a clinical implementation of a Deep Learning (DL) auto-planning model for left-sided breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeverino, Michele, Piccolo, Consiglia, Wuethrich, Diana, Jeanneret-Sozzi, Wendy, Marguet, Maud, Bourhis, Jean, Bochud, Francois, Moeckli, Raphael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10534254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100492
_version_ 1785112351051087872
author Zeverino, Michele
Piccolo, Consiglia
Wuethrich, Diana
Jeanneret-Sozzi, Wendy
Marguet, Maud
Bourhis, Jean
Bochud, Francois
Moeckli, Raphael
author_facet Zeverino, Michele
Piccolo, Consiglia
Wuethrich, Diana
Jeanneret-Sozzi, Wendy
Marguet, Maud
Bourhis, Jean
Bochud, Francois
Moeckli, Raphael
author_sort Zeverino, Michele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Automation in radiotherapy treatment planning aims to improve both the quality and the efficiency of the process. The aim of this study was to report on a clinical implementation of a Deep Learning (DL) auto-planning model for left-sided breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DL model was developed for left-sided breast simultaneous integrated boost treatments under deep-inspiration breath-hold. Eighty manual dose distributions were revised and used for training. Ten patients were used for model validation. The model was then used to design 17 clinical auto-plans. Manual and auto-plans were scored on a list of clinical goals for both targets and organs-at-risk (OARs). For validation, predicted and mimicked dose (PD and MD, respectively) percent error (PE) was calculated with respect to manual dose. Clinical and validation cohorts were compared in terms of MD only. RESULTS: Median values of both PD and MD validation plans fulfilled the evaluation criteria. PE was < 1% for targets for both PD and MD. PD was well aligned to manual dose while MD left lung mean dose was significantly less (median:5.1 Gy vs 6.1 Gy). The left-anterior-descending artery maximum dose was found out of requirements (median values:+5.9 Gy and + 2.9 Gy, for PD and MD respectively) in three validation cases, while it was reduced for clinical cases (median:−1.9 Gy). No other clinically significant differences were observed between clinical and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: Small OAR differences observed during the model validation were not found clinically relevant. The clinical implementation outcomes confirmed the robustness of the model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10534254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105342542023-09-29 Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning Zeverino, Michele Piccolo, Consiglia Wuethrich, Diana Jeanneret-Sozzi, Wendy Marguet, Maud Bourhis, Jean Bochud, Francois Moeckli, Raphael Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Automation in radiotherapy treatment planning aims to improve both the quality and the efficiency of the process. The aim of this study was to report on a clinical implementation of a Deep Learning (DL) auto-planning model for left-sided breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DL model was developed for left-sided breast simultaneous integrated boost treatments under deep-inspiration breath-hold. Eighty manual dose distributions were revised and used for training. Ten patients were used for model validation. The model was then used to design 17 clinical auto-plans. Manual and auto-plans were scored on a list of clinical goals for both targets and organs-at-risk (OARs). For validation, predicted and mimicked dose (PD and MD, respectively) percent error (PE) was calculated with respect to manual dose. Clinical and validation cohorts were compared in terms of MD only. RESULTS: Median values of both PD and MD validation plans fulfilled the evaluation criteria. PE was < 1% for targets for both PD and MD. PD was well aligned to manual dose while MD left lung mean dose was significantly less (median:5.1 Gy vs 6.1 Gy). The left-anterior-descending artery maximum dose was found out of requirements (median values:+5.9 Gy and + 2.9 Gy, for PD and MD respectively) in three validation cases, while it was reduced for clinical cases (median:−1.9 Gy). No other clinically significant differences were observed between clinical and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: Small OAR differences observed during the model validation were not found clinically relevant. The clinical implementation outcomes confirmed the robustness of the model. Elsevier 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10534254/ /pubmed/37780177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100492 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Zeverino, Michele
Piccolo, Consiglia
Wuethrich, Diana
Jeanneret-Sozzi, Wendy
Marguet, Maud
Bourhis, Jean
Bochud, Francois
Moeckli, Raphael
Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning
title Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning
title_full Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning
title_fullStr Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning
title_full_unstemmed Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning
title_short Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning
title_sort clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10534254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100492
work_keys_str_mv AT zeverinomichele clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT piccoloconsiglia clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT wuethrichdiana clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT jeanneretsozziwendy clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT marguetmaud clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT bourhisjean clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT bochudfrancois clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT moeckliraphael clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning