Cargando…
Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Automation in radiotherapy treatment planning aims to improve both the quality and the efficiency of the process. The aim of this study was to report on a clinical implementation of a Deep Learning (DL) auto-planning model for left-sided breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10534254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100492 |
_version_ | 1785112351051087872 |
---|---|
author | Zeverino, Michele Piccolo, Consiglia Wuethrich, Diana Jeanneret-Sozzi, Wendy Marguet, Maud Bourhis, Jean Bochud, Francois Moeckli, Raphael |
author_facet | Zeverino, Michele Piccolo, Consiglia Wuethrich, Diana Jeanneret-Sozzi, Wendy Marguet, Maud Bourhis, Jean Bochud, Francois Moeckli, Raphael |
author_sort | Zeverino, Michele |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Automation in radiotherapy treatment planning aims to improve both the quality and the efficiency of the process. The aim of this study was to report on a clinical implementation of a Deep Learning (DL) auto-planning model for left-sided breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DL model was developed for left-sided breast simultaneous integrated boost treatments under deep-inspiration breath-hold. Eighty manual dose distributions were revised and used for training. Ten patients were used for model validation. The model was then used to design 17 clinical auto-plans. Manual and auto-plans were scored on a list of clinical goals for both targets and organs-at-risk (OARs). For validation, predicted and mimicked dose (PD and MD, respectively) percent error (PE) was calculated with respect to manual dose. Clinical and validation cohorts were compared in terms of MD only. RESULTS: Median values of both PD and MD validation plans fulfilled the evaluation criteria. PE was < 1% for targets for both PD and MD. PD was well aligned to manual dose while MD left lung mean dose was significantly less (median:5.1 Gy vs 6.1 Gy). The left-anterior-descending artery maximum dose was found out of requirements (median values:+5.9 Gy and + 2.9 Gy, for PD and MD respectively) in three validation cases, while it was reduced for clinical cases (median:−1.9 Gy). No other clinically significant differences were observed between clinical and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: Small OAR differences observed during the model validation were not found clinically relevant. The clinical implementation outcomes confirmed the robustness of the model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10534254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105342542023-09-29 Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning Zeverino, Michele Piccolo, Consiglia Wuethrich, Diana Jeanneret-Sozzi, Wendy Marguet, Maud Bourhis, Jean Bochud, Francois Moeckli, Raphael Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Automation in radiotherapy treatment planning aims to improve both the quality and the efficiency of the process. The aim of this study was to report on a clinical implementation of a Deep Learning (DL) auto-planning model for left-sided breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DL model was developed for left-sided breast simultaneous integrated boost treatments under deep-inspiration breath-hold. Eighty manual dose distributions were revised and used for training. Ten patients were used for model validation. The model was then used to design 17 clinical auto-plans. Manual and auto-plans were scored on a list of clinical goals for both targets and organs-at-risk (OARs). For validation, predicted and mimicked dose (PD and MD, respectively) percent error (PE) was calculated with respect to manual dose. Clinical and validation cohorts were compared in terms of MD only. RESULTS: Median values of both PD and MD validation plans fulfilled the evaluation criteria. PE was < 1% for targets for both PD and MD. PD was well aligned to manual dose while MD left lung mean dose was significantly less (median:5.1 Gy vs 6.1 Gy). The left-anterior-descending artery maximum dose was found out of requirements (median values:+5.9 Gy and + 2.9 Gy, for PD and MD respectively) in three validation cases, while it was reduced for clinical cases (median:−1.9 Gy). No other clinically significant differences were observed between clinical and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: Small OAR differences observed during the model validation were not found clinically relevant. The clinical implementation outcomes confirmed the robustness of the model. Elsevier 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10534254/ /pubmed/37780177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100492 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Zeverino, Michele Piccolo, Consiglia Wuethrich, Diana Jeanneret-Sozzi, Wendy Marguet, Maud Bourhis, Jean Bochud, Francois Moeckli, Raphael Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning |
title | Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning |
title_full | Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning |
title_fullStr | Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning |
title_short | Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning |
title_sort | clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10534254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100492 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zeverinomichele clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning AT piccoloconsiglia clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning AT wuethrichdiana clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning AT jeanneretsozziwendy clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning AT marguetmaud clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning AT bourhisjean clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning AT bochudfrancois clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning AT moeckliraphael clinicalimplementationofdeeplearningbasedautomatedleftbreastsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapytreatmentplanning |