Cargando…

Assessing Continuous Epidural Infusion and Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Their Effectiveness in Providing Labor Analgesia: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study

Background and Objectives: Local anesthetics administered via epidural catheters have evolved from intermittent top-ups to simultaneous administration of continuous epidural infusion (CEI) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using the same device. The latest programmed intermittent epid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsao, Shao-Lun, Li, Wen-Tyng, Chang, Li-Yun, Yeh, Pin-Hung, Yeh, Liang-Tsai, Liu, Ling-Jun, Yeh, Chao-Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10535284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37763698
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091579
_version_ 1785112594778947584
author Tsao, Shao-Lun
Li, Wen-Tyng
Chang, Li-Yun
Yeh, Pin-Hung
Yeh, Liang-Tsai
Liu, Ling-Jun
Yeh, Chao-Bin
author_facet Tsao, Shao-Lun
Li, Wen-Tyng
Chang, Li-Yun
Yeh, Pin-Hung
Yeh, Liang-Tsai
Liu, Ling-Jun
Yeh, Chao-Bin
author_sort Tsao, Shao-Lun
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Local anesthetics administered via epidural catheters have evolved from intermittent top-ups to simultaneous administration of continuous epidural infusion (CEI) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using the same device. The latest programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) model is believed to create a wider and more even distribution of analgesia inside the epidural space. The switch from CEI + PCEA to PIEB + PCEA in our department began in 2018; however, we received conflicting feedback regarding workload from the quality assurance team. This study aimed to investigate the benefits and drawbacks of this conversion, including the differences in acute pain service (APS) staff workload, maternal satisfaction, side effects, and complications before and after the changeover. Materials and Methods: Items from the APS records included total delivery time, average local anesthetic dosage, and the formerly mentioned items. The incidence of side effects, the association between the duration of delivery and total dosage, and hourly medication usage in the time subgroups of the CEI and PIEB groups were compared. The staff workload incurred from rescue bolus injection, catheter adjustment, and dosage adjustment was also analyzed. Results: The final analysis included 214 and 272 cases of CEI + PCEA and PIEB + PCEA for labor analgesia, respectively. The total amount of medication and average hourly dosage were significantly lower in the PIEB + PCEA group. The incidences of dosage change, manual bolus, extra visits per patient, and lidocaine use for rescue bolus were greater in the PIEB + PCEA group, indicating an increased staff workload. However, the two groups did not differ in CS rates, labor time, maternal satisfaction, and side effects. Conclusions: This study revealed that while PIEB + PCEA maintained the advantage of decreasing total drug doses, it inadvertently increased the staff burden. Increased workload might be a consideration in clinical settings when choosing between different methods of PCEA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10535284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105352842023-09-29 Assessing Continuous Epidural Infusion and Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Their Effectiveness in Providing Labor Analgesia: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study Tsao, Shao-Lun Li, Wen-Tyng Chang, Li-Yun Yeh, Pin-Hung Yeh, Liang-Tsai Liu, Ling-Jun Yeh, Chao-Bin Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Local anesthetics administered via epidural catheters have evolved from intermittent top-ups to simultaneous administration of continuous epidural infusion (CEI) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using the same device. The latest programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) model is believed to create a wider and more even distribution of analgesia inside the epidural space. The switch from CEI + PCEA to PIEB + PCEA in our department began in 2018; however, we received conflicting feedback regarding workload from the quality assurance team. This study aimed to investigate the benefits and drawbacks of this conversion, including the differences in acute pain service (APS) staff workload, maternal satisfaction, side effects, and complications before and after the changeover. Materials and Methods: Items from the APS records included total delivery time, average local anesthetic dosage, and the formerly mentioned items. The incidence of side effects, the association between the duration of delivery and total dosage, and hourly medication usage in the time subgroups of the CEI and PIEB groups were compared. The staff workload incurred from rescue bolus injection, catheter adjustment, and dosage adjustment was also analyzed. Results: The final analysis included 214 and 272 cases of CEI + PCEA and PIEB + PCEA for labor analgesia, respectively. The total amount of medication and average hourly dosage were significantly lower in the PIEB + PCEA group. The incidences of dosage change, manual bolus, extra visits per patient, and lidocaine use for rescue bolus were greater in the PIEB + PCEA group, indicating an increased staff workload. However, the two groups did not differ in CS rates, labor time, maternal satisfaction, and side effects. Conclusions: This study revealed that while PIEB + PCEA maintained the advantage of decreasing total drug doses, it inadvertently increased the staff burden. Increased workload might be a consideration in clinical settings when choosing between different methods of PCEA. MDPI 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10535284/ /pubmed/37763698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091579 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tsao, Shao-Lun
Li, Wen-Tyng
Chang, Li-Yun
Yeh, Pin-Hung
Yeh, Liang-Tsai
Liu, Ling-Jun
Yeh, Chao-Bin
Assessing Continuous Epidural Infusion and Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Their Effectiveness in Providing Labor Analgesia: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study
title Assessing Continuous Epidural Infusion and Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Their Effectiveness in Providing Labor Analgesia: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study
title_full Assessing Continuous Epidural Infusion and Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Their Effectiveness in Providing Labor Analgesia: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study
title_fullStr Assessing Continuous Epidural Infusion and Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Their Effectiveness in Providing Labor Analgesia: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Continuous Epidural Infusion and Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Their Effectiveness in Providing Labor Analgesia: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study
title_short Assessing Continuous Epidural Infusion and Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Their Effectiveness in Providing Labor Analgesia: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study
title_sort assessing continuous epidural infusion and programmed intermittent epidural bolus for their effectiveness in providing labor analgesia: a mono-centric retrospective comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10535284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37763698
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091579
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaoshaolun assessingcontinuousepiduralinfusionandprogrammedintermittentepiduralbolusfortheireffectivenessinprovidinglaboranalgesiaamonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT liwentyng assessingcontinuousepiduralinfusionandprogrammedintermittentepiduralbolusfortheireffectivenessinprovidinglaboranalgesiaamonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT changliyun assessingcontinuousepiduralinfusionandprogrammedintermittentepiduralbolusfortheireffectivenessinprovidinglaboranalgesiaamonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT yehpinhung assessingcontinuousepiduralinfusionandprogrammedintermittentepiduralbolusfortheireffectivenessinprovidinglaboranalgesiaamonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT yehliangtsai assessingcontinuousepiduralinfusionandprogrammedintermittentepiduralbolusfortheireffectivenessinprovidinglaboranalgesiaamonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT liulingjun assessingcontinuousepiduralinfusionandprogrammedintermittentepiduralbolusfortheireffectivenessinprovidinglaboranalgesiaamonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT yehchaobin assessingcontinuousepiduralinfusionandprogrammedintermittentepiduralbolusfortheireffectivenessinprovidinglaboranalgesiaamonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy