Cargando…

Is There a Difference in the Distribution of Mechanoreceptors among the Three Sections of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament?

Background: We investigated whether the distribution of mechanoreceptors in three sections of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) differed. Methods: The ATFL was obtained from 29 ankles of 21 fresh-frozen cadavers and divided into fibular attachment, mid-ligament, and talar attachment parts. Hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Youngkoo, Park, Wonseok, Lee, Hyerim, Choi, Youngsuk, Kim, Sunghwan, Yeo, Euidong, Lee, Hongseop, Jung, Kijin, Lee, Byungryul, Lee, Myoungjin, Kim, Woojong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10535615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37763629
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091510
_version_ 1785112672060047360
author Lee, Youngkoo
Park, Wonseok
Lee, Hyerim
Choi, Youngsuk
Kim, Sunghwan
Yeo, Euidong
Lee, Hongseop
Jung, Kijin
Lee, Byungryul
Lee, Myoungjin
Kim, Woojong
author_facet Lee, Youngkoo
Park, Wonseok
Lee, Hyerim
Choi, Youngsuk
Kim, Sunghwan
Yeo, Euidong
Lee, Hongseop
Jung, Kijin
Lee, Byungryul
Lee, Myoungjin
Kim, Woojong
author_sort Lee, Youngkoo
collection PubMed
description Background: We investigated whether the distribution of mechanoreceptors in three sections of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) differed. Methods: The ATFL was obtained from 29 ankles of 21 fresh-frozen cadavers and divided into fibular attachment, mid-ligament, and talar attachment parts. Histologically, mechanoreceptors were classified as Ruffini (type I), Vater–Pacini (type II), Golgi–Mazzoni (type III), and free nerve ending corpuscles (type IV); the presence of these mechanoreceptors was compared among the three ATFL sections. Results: Type I mechanoreceptors were significantly more numerous than the other receptor types. Comparing the three sections of the ATFL, the number of type I mechanoreceptors differed significantly between the mid-ligament and fibular attachment (p = 0.006), while the number of type III mechanoreceptors differed significantly between the talar and fibular attachments (p = 0.005) and between the mid-ligament and talar attachment (p = 0.011). Conclusions: The four types of mechanoreceptors were distributed differently among the three sections of the ATFL. Type I mechanoreceptors were more numerous in all sections compared to the other receptors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10535615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105356152023-09-29 Is There a Difference in the Distribution of Mechanoreceptors among the Three Sections of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament? Lee, Youngkoo Park, Wonseok Lee, Hyerim Choi, Youngsuk Kim, Sunghwan Yeo, Euidong Lee, Hongseop Jung, Kijin Lee, Byungryul Lee, Myoungjin Kim, Woojong Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background: We investigated whether the distribution of mechanoreceptors in three sections of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) differed. Methods: The ATFL was obtained from 29 ankles of 21 fresh-frozen cadavers and divided into fibular attachment, mid-ligament, and talar attachment parts. Histologically, mechanoreceptors were classified as Ruffini (type I), Vater–Pacini (type II), Golgi–Mazzoni (type III), and free nerve ending corpuscles (type IV); the presence of these mechanoreceptors was compared among the three ATFL sections. Results: Type I mechanoreceptors were significantly more numerous than the other receptor types. Comparing the three sections of the ATFL, the number of type I mechanoreceptors differed significantly between the mid-ligament and fibular attachment (p = 0.006), while the number of type III mechanoreceptors differed significantly between the talar and fibular attachments (p = 0.005) and between the mid-ligament and talar attachment (p = 0.011). Conclusions: The four types of mechanoreceptors were distributed differently among the three sections of the ATFL. Type I mechanoreceptors were more numerous in all sections compared to the other receptors. MDPI 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10535615/ /pubmed/37763629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091510 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Youngkoo
Park, Wonseok
Lee, Hyerim
Choi, Youngsuk
Kim, Sunghwan
Yeo, Euidong
Lee, Hongseop
Jung, Kijin
Lee, Byungryul
Lee, Myoungjin
Kim, Woojong
Is There a Difference in the Distribution of Mechanoreceptors among the Three Sections of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament?
title Is There a Difference in the Distribution of Mechanoreceptors among the Three Sections of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament?
title_full Is There a Difference in the Distribution of Mechanoreceptors among the Three Sections of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament?
title_fullStr Is There a Difference in the Distribution of Mechanoreceptors among the Three Sections of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament?
title_full_unstemmed Is There a Difference in the Distribution of Mechanoreceptors among the Three Sections of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament?
title_short Is There a Difference in the Distribution of Mechanoreceptors among the Three Sections of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament?
title_sort is there a difference in the distribution of mechanoreceptors among the three sections of the anterior talofibular ligament?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10535615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37763629
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091510
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyoungkoo isthereadifferenceinthedistributionofmechanoreceptorsamongthethreesectionsoftheanteriortalofibularligament
AT parkwonseok isthereadifferenceinthedistributionofmechanoreceptorsamongthethreesectionsoftheanteriortalofibularligament
AT leehyerim isthereadifferenceinthedistributionofmechanoreceptorsamongthethreesectionsoftheanteriortalofibularligament
AT choiyoungsuk isthereadifferenceinthedistributionofmechanoreceptorsamongthethreesectionsoftheanteriortalofibularligament
AT kimsunghwan isthereadifferenceinthedistributionofmechanoreceptorsamongthethreesectionsoftheanteriortalofibularligament
AT yeoeuidong isthereadifferenceinthedistributionofmechanoreceptorsamongthethreesectionsoftheanteriortalofibularligament
AT leehongseop isthereadifferenceinthedistributionofmechanoreceptorsamongthethreesectionsoftheanteriortalofibularligament
AT jungkijin isthereadifferenceinthedistributionofmechanoreceptorsamongthethreesectionsoftheanteriortalofibularligament
AT leebyungryul isthereadifferenceinthedistributionofmechanoreceptorsamongthethreesectionsoftheanteriortalofibularligament
AT leemyoungjin isthereadifferenceinthedistributionofmechanoreceptorsamongthethreesectionsoftheanteriortalofibularligament
AT kimwoojong isthereadifferenceinthedistributionofmechanoreceptorsamongthethreesectionsoftheanteriortalofibularligament