Cargando…

Quantitative Dynamic Allodynograph—A Standardized Measure for Testing Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia in Chronic Limb Pain

Background: Dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA) is both a symptom and a central sensitization sign, yet no standardized method for quantifying the DMA area has been reported. This study aimed to establish psychometric properties for Quantitative Dynamic Allodynography (QDA), a newly developed protoco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turgeman Dahan, Noy, Vatine, Jean-Jacques, Weissman-Fogel, Irit, Karpin, Hana, Shmuely, Sharon, Bar-Shalita, Tami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10535773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23187949
_version_ 1785112710298468352
author Turgeman Dahan, Noy
Vatine, Jean-Jacques
Weissman-Fogel, Irit
Karpin, Hana
Shmuely, Sharon
Bar-Shalita, Tami
author_facet Turgeman Dahan, Noy
Vatine, Jean-Jacques
Weissman-Fogel, Irit
Karpin, Hana
Shmuely, Sharon
Bar-Shalita, Tami
author_sort Turgeman Dahan, Noy
collection PubMed
description Background: Dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA) is both a symptom and a central sensitization sign, yet no standardized method for quantifying the DMA area has been reported. This study aimed to establish psychometric properties for Quantitative Dynamic Allodynography (QDA), a newly developed protocol measuring the DMA area as a percentage of the body surface. Methods: Seventy-eight patients aged 18–65 diagnosed with chronic complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) participated in this study. Test–retest reliability was conducted twice, one week apart (N = 20), and inter-rater (N = 3) reliability was conducted on 10 participants. Disease severity (CRPS Severity Score, CSS), pain intensity (VAS), and quality of life (SF-36) measures were utilized to test construct validity. Results: High inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.96, p < 0.001) and test–retest reliability (r = 0.98, p < 0.001) were found. Furthermore, the QDA score was found to be correlated with the CSS (r = 0.47, p < 0.001), VAS (r = 0.37, p < 0.001), and the SF-36 physical health total (r = −0.47, p < 0.001) scores. Conclusion: The QDA is the first developed reliable and valid protocol for measuring DMA in a clinical setting and may be used as a diagnostic and prognostic measure in clinics and in research, advancing the pain precision medicine approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10535773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105357732023-09-29 Quantitative Dynamic Allodynograph—A Standardized Measure for Testing Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia in Chronic Limb Pain Turgeman Dahan, Noy Vatine, Jean-Jacques Weissman-Fogel, Irit Karpin, Hana Shmuely, Sharon Bar-Shalita, Tami Sensors (Basel) Article Background: Dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA) is both a symptom and a central sensitization sign, yet no standardized method for quantifying the DMA area has been reported. This study aimed to establish psychometric properties for Quantitative Dynamic Allodynography (QDA), a newly developed protocol measuring the DMA area as a percentage of the body surface. Methods: Seventy-eight patients aged 18–65 diagnosed with chronic complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) participated in this study. Test–retest reliability was conducted twice, one week apart (N = 20), and inter-rater (N = 3) reliability was conducted on 10 participants. Disease severity (CRPS Severity Score, CSS), pain intensity (VAS), and quality of life (SF-36) measures were utilized to test construct validity. Results: High inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.96, p < 0.001) and test–retest reliability (r = 0.98, p < 0.001) were found. Furthermore, the QDA score was found to be correlated with the CSS (r = 0.47, p < 0.001), VAS (r = 0.37, p < 0.001), and the SF-36 physical health total (r = −0.47, p < 0.001) scores. Conclusion: The QDA is the first developed reliable and valid protocol for measuring DMA in a clinical setting and may be used as a diagnostic and prognostic measure in clinics and in research, advancing the pain precision medicine approach. MDPI 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10535773/ /pubmed/37766006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23187949 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Turgeman Dahan, Noy
Vatine, Jean-Jacques
Weissman-Fogel, Irit
Karpin, Hana
Shmuely, Sharon
Bar-Shalita, Tami
Quantitative Dynamic Allodynograph—A Standardized Measure for Testing Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia in Chronic Limb Pain
title Quantitative Dynamic Allodynograph—A Standardized Measure for Testing Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia in Chronic Limb Pain
title_full Quantitative Dynamic Allodynograph—A Standardized Measure for Testing Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia in Chronic Limb Pain
title_fullStr Quantitative Dynamic Allodynograph—A Standardized Measure for Testing Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia in Chronic Limb Pain
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Dynamic Allodynograph—A Standardized Measure for Testing Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia in Chronic Limb Pain
title_short Quantitative Dynamic Allodynograph—A Standardized Measure for Testing Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia in Chronic Limb Pain
title_sort quantitative dynamic allodynograph—a standardized measure for testing dynamic mechanical allodynia in chronic limb pain
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10535773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23187949
work_keys_str_mv AT turgemandahannoy quantitativedynamicallodynographastandardizedmeasurefortestingdynamicmechanicalallodyniainchroniclimbpain
AT vatinejeanjacques quantitativedynamicallodynographastandardizedmeasurefortestingdynamicmechanicalallodyniainchroniclimbpain
AT weissmanfogelirit quantitativedynamicallodynographastandardizedmeasurefortestingdynamicmechanicalallodyniainchroniclimbpain
AT karpinhana quantitativedynamicallodynographastandardizedmeasurefortestingdynamicmechanicalallodyniainchroniclimbpain
AT shmuelysharon quantitativedynamicallodynographastandardizedmeasurefortestingdynamicmechanicalallodyniainchroniclimbpain
AT barshalitatami quantitativedynamicallodynographastandardizedmeasurefortestingdynamicmechanicalallodyniainchroniclimbpain