Cargando…
A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals
This study is a pilot literature review that compares the interest of neuroethicists and neuroscientists. It aims to determine whether there is a significant gap between the neuroethical issues addressed in philosophical neuroethics journals and neuroscience journals. We retrieved 614 articles from...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10536163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1160611 |
_version_ | 1785112800774848512 |
---|---|
author | Ishida, Shu Nishitsutsumi, Yu Kashioka, Hideki Taguchi, Takahisa Shineha, Ryuma |
author_facet | Ishida, Shu Nishitsutsumi, Yu Kashioka, Hideki Taguchi, Takahisa Shineha, Ryuma |
author_sort | Ishida, Shu |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study is a pilot literature review that compares the interest of neuroethicists and neuroscientists. It aims to determine whether there is a significant gap between the neuroethical issues addressed in philosophical neuroethics journals and neuroscience journals. We retrieved 614 articles from two specialist neuroethics journals (Neuroethics and AJOB Neuroscience) and 82 neuroethics-focused articles from three specialist neuroscience journals (Neuron, Nature Neuroscience, and Nature Reviews Neuroscience). We classified these articles in light of the neuroethical issue in question before we compared the neuroethical issues addressed in philosophical neuroethics with those addressed by neuroscientists. A notable result is a parallelism between them as a general tendency. Neuroscientific articles cover most neuroethical issues discussed by philosophical ethicists and vice versa. Subsequently, there are notable discrepancies between the two bodies of neuroethics literature. For instance, theoretical questions, such as the ethics of moral enhancement and the philosophical implications of neuroscientific findings on our conception of personhood, are more intensely discussed in philosophical-neuroethical articles. Conversely, neuroscientific articles tend to emphasize practical questions, such as how to successfully integrate ethical perspectives into scientific research projects and justifiable practices of animal-involving neuroscientific research. These observations will help us settle the common starting point of the attempt at “ethics integration” in emerging neuroscience, contributing to better governance design and neuroethical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10536163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105361632023-09-29 A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals Ishida, Shu Nishitsutsumi, Yu Kashioka, Hideki Taguchi, Takahisa Shineha, Ryuma Front Neurosci Neuroscience This study is a pilot literature review that compares the interest of neuroethicists and neuroscientists. It aims to determine whether there is a significant gap between the neuroethical issues addressed in philosophical neuroethics journals and neuroscience journals. We retrieved 614 articles from two specialist neuroethics journals (Neuroethics and AJOB Neuroscience) and 82 neuroethics-focused articles from three specialist neuroscience journals (Neuron, Nature Neuroscience, and Nature Reviews Neuroscience). We classified these articles in light of the neuroethical issue in question before we compared the neuroethical issues addressed in philosophical neuroethics with those addressed by neuroscientists. A notable result is a parallelism between them as a general tendency. Neuroscientific articles cover most neuroethical issues discussed by philosophical ethicists and vice versa. Subsequently, there are notable discrepancies between the two bodies of neuroethics literature. For instance, theoretical questions, such as the ethics of moral enhancement and the philosophical implications of neuroscientific findings on our conception of personhood, are more intensely discussed in philosophical-neuroethical articles. Conversely, neuroscientific articles tend to emphasize practical questions, such as how to successfully integrate ethical perspectives into scientific research projects and justifiable practices of animal-involving neuroscientific research. These observations will help us settle the common starting point of the attempt at “ethics integration” in emerging neuroscience, contributing to better governance design and neuroethical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10536163/ /pubmed/37781239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1160611 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ishida, Nishitsutsumi, Kashioka, Taguchi and Shineha. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Ishida, Shu Nishitsutsumi, Yu Kashioka, Hideki Taguchi, Takahisa Shineha, Ryuma A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals |
title | A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals |
title_full | A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals |
title_fullStr | A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals |
title_short | A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals |
title_sort | comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10536163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1160611 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ishidashu acomparativereviewonneuroethicalissuesinneuroscientificandneuroethicaljournals AT nishitsutsumiyu acomparativereviewonneuroethicalissuesinneuroscientificandneuroethicaljournals AT kashiokahideki acomparativereviewonneuroethicalissuesinneuroscientificandneuroethicaljournals AT taguchitakahisa acomparativereviewonneuroethicalissuesinneuroscientificandneuroethicaljournals AT shineharyuma acomparativereviewonneuroethicalissuesinneuroscientificandneuroethicaljournals AT ishidashu comparativereviewonneuroethicalissuesinneuroscientificandneuroethicaljournals AT nishitsutsumiyu comparativereviewonneuroethicalissuesinneuroscientificandneuroethicaljournals AT kashiokahideki comparativereviewonneuroethicalissuesinneuroscientificandneuroethicaljournals AT taguchitakahisa comparativereviewonneuroethicalissuesinneuroscientificandneuroethicaljournals AT shineharyuma comparativereviewonneuroethicalissuesinneuroscientificandneuroethicaljournals |