Cargando…

The rubber hand illusion evaluated using different stimulation modalities

Tactile feedback plays a vital role in inducing ownership and improving motor control of prosthetic hands. However, commercially available prosthetic hands typically do not provide tactile feedback and because of that the prosthetic user must rely on visual input to adjust the grip. The classical ru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Svensson, Pamela, Malešević, Nebojša, Wijk, Ulrika, Björkman, Anders, Antfolk, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10536259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1237053
_version_ 1785112823418847232
author Svensson, Pamela
Malešević, Nebojša
Wijk, Ulrika
Björkman, Anders
Antfolk, Christian
author_facet Svensson, Pamela
Malešević, Nebojša
Wijk, Ulrika
Björkman, Anders
Antfolk, Christian
author_sort Svensson, Pamela
collection PubMed
description Tactile feedback plays a vital role in inducing ownership and improving motor control of prosthetic hands. However, commercially available prosthetic hands typically do not provide tactile feedback and because of that the prosthetic user must rely on visual input to adjust the grip. The classical rubber hand illusion (RHI) where a brush is stroking the rubber hand, and the user’s hidden hand synchronously can induce ownership of a rubber hand. In the classic RHI the stimulation is modality-matched, meaning that the stimulus on the real hand matches the stimulus on the rubber hand. The RHI has also been used in previous studies with a prosthetic hand as the “rubber hand,” suggesting that a hand prosthesis can be incorporated within the amputee’s body scheme. Interestingly, previous studies have shown that stimulation with a mismatched modality, where the rubber hand was brushed, and vibrations were felt on the hidden hand also induced the RHI. The aim of this study was to compare how well mechanotactile, vibrotactile, and electrotactile feedback induced the RHI in able-bodied participants and forearm amputees. 27 participants with intact hands and three transradial amputees took part in a modified RHI experiment. The rubber hand was stroked with a brush, and the participant’s hidden hand/residual limb received stimulation with either brush stroking, electricity, pressure, or vibration. The three latter stimulations were modality mismatched with regard to the brushstroke. Participants were tested for ten different combinations (stimulation blocks) where the stimulations were applied on the volar (glabrous skin), and dorsal (hairy skin) sides of the hand. Outcome was assessed using two standard tests (questionnaire and proprioceptive drift). All types of stimulation induced RHI but electrical and vibration stimulation induced a stronger RHI than pressure. After completing more stimulation blocks, the proprioceptive drift test showed that the difference between pre- and post-test was reduced. This indicates that the illusion was drifting toward the rubber hand further into the session.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10536259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105362592023-09-29 The rubber hand illusion evaluated using different stimulation modalities Svensson, Pamela Malešević, Nebojša Wijk, Ulrika Björkman, Anders Antfolk, Christian Front Neurosci Neuroscience Tactile feedback plays a vital role in inducing ownership and improving motor control of prosthetic hands. However, commercially available prosthetic hands typically do not provide tactile feedback and because of that the prosthetic user must rely on visual input to adjust the grip. The classical rubber hand illusion (RHI) where a brush is stroking the rubber hand, and the user’s hidden hand synchronously can induce ownership of a rubber hand. In the classic RHI the stimulation is modality-matched, meaning that the stimulus on the real hand matches the stimulus on the rubber hand. The RHI has also been used in previous studies with a prosthetic hand as the “rubber hand,” suggesting that a hand prosthesis can be incorporated within the amputee’s body scheme. Interestingly, previous studies have shown that stimulation with a mismatched modality, where the rubber hand was brushed, and vibrations were felt on the hidden hand also induced the RHI. The aim of this study was to compare how well mechanotactile, vibrotactile, and electrotactile feedback induced the RHI in able-bodied participants and forearm amputees. 27 participants with intact hands and three transradial amputees took part in a modified RHI experiment. The rubber hand was stroked with a brush, and the participant’s hidden hand/residual limb received stimulation with either brush stroking, electricity, pressure, or vibration. The three latter stimulations were modality mismatched with regard to the brushstroke. Participants were tested for ten different combinations (stimulation blocks) where the stimulations were applied on the volar (glabrous skin), and dorsal (hairy skin) sides of the hand. Outcome was assessed using two standard tests (questionnaire and proprioceptive drift). All types of stimulation induced RHI but electrical and vibration stimulation induced a stronger RHI than pressure. After completing more stimulation blocks, the proprioceptive drift test showed that the difference between pre- and post-test was reduced. This indicates that the illusion was drifting toward the rubber hand further into the session. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10536259/ /pubmed/37781250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1237053 Text en Copyright © 2023 Svensson, Malešević, Wijk, Björkman and Antfolk. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Svensson, Pamela
Malešević, Nebojša
Wijk, Ulrika
Björkman, Anders
Antfolk, Christian
The rubber hand illusion evaluated using different stimulation modalities
title The rubber hand illusion evaluated using different stimulation modalities
title_full The rubber hand illusion evaluated using different stimulation modalities
title_fullStr The rubber hand illusion evaluated using different stimulation modalities
title_full_unstemmed The rubber hand illusion evaluated using different stimulation modalities
title_short The rubber hand illusion evaluated using different stimulation modalities
title_sort rubber hand illusion evaluated using different stimulation modalities
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10536259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1237053
work_keys_str_mv AT svenssonpamela therubberhandillusionevaluatedusingdifferentstimulationmodalities
AT malesevicnebojsa therubberhandillusionevaluatedusingdifferentstimulationmodalities
AT wijkulrika therubberhandillusionevaluatedusingdifferentstimulationmodalities
AT bjorkmananders therubberhandillusionevaluatedusingdifferentstimulationmodalities
AT antfolkchristian therubberhandillusionevaluatedusingdifferentstimulationmodalities
AT svenssonpamela rubberhandillusionevaluatedusingdifferentstimulationmodalities
AT malesevicnebojsa rubberhandillusionevaluatedusingdifferentstimulationmodalities
AT wijkulrika rubberhandillusionevaluatedusingdifferentstimulationmodalities
AT bjorkmananders rubberhandillusionevaluatedusingdifferentstimulationmodalities
AT antfolkchristian rubberhandillusionevaluatedusingdifferentstimulationmodalities