Cargando…

Self-expanding metal stents versus decompression tubes as a bridge to surgery for patients with obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Using self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) and decompression tubes (DT) as a bridge-to-surgery (BTS) treatment may avoid emergency operations for patients with colorectal cancer-caused obstructions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two approaches. METHODS: We sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Wei, Zhang, Jian-Cheng, Luo, Kun, Wang, Lu, Zhang, Chi, Cai, Bin, Jiang, Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10536785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00515-6
_version_ 1785112951816978432
author Ma, Wei
Zhang, Jian-Cheng
Luo, Kun
Wang, Lu
Zhang, Chi
Cai, Bin
Jiang, Hua
author_facet Ma, Wei
Zhang, Jian-Cheng
Luo, Kun
Wang, Lu
Zhang, Chi
Cai, Bin
Jiang, Hua
author_sort Ma, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Using self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) and decompression tubes (DT) as a bridge-to-surgery (BTS) treatment may avoid emergency operations for patients with colorectal cancer-caused obstructions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two approaches. METHODS: We systematically retrieved literature from January 1, 2000, to May 30, 2023, from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, Wanfang Data, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies of SEMS versus DT as BTS in colorectal cancer obstruction were selected. Risks of bias were assessed for RCTs and cohort studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2 and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions. Certainty of evidence was determined using the Graded Recommendation Assessment. Odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to analyze measurement data. RESULTS: We included eight RCTs and eighteen cohort studies involving 2,061 patients (SEMS, 1,044; DT, 1,017). Pooled RCT and cohort data indicated the SEMS group had a significantly higher clinical success rate than the DT group (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.04, 3.81, P = 0.04), but no significant difference regarding technical success (OR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.56, 2.96, P = 0.55). SEMS had a shorter postoperative length of hospital stays (MD = − 4.47, 95% CI − 6.26, − 2.69, P < 0.00001), a lower rates of operation-related abdominal pain (OR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.05, 0.50, P = 0.002), intraoperative bleeding (MD = − 37.67, 95% CI − 62.73, − 12.60, P = 0.003), stoma creation (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.23, 0.73, P = 0.002) and long-term tumor recurrence rate than DT (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.22, 0.99, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: SEMS and DT are both safe as BTS to avoid emergency surgery for patients with colorectal cancer obstruction. SEMS is preferable because of higher clinical success rates, lower rates of operation-related abdominal pain, intraoperative bleeding, stoma creation, and long-term tumor recurrence, as well as a shorter postoperative length of hospital stays. Trial registration CRD42022365951. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-023-00515-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10536785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105367852023-09-29 Self-expanding metal stents versus decompression tubes as a bridge to surgery for patients with obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ma, Wei Zhang, Jian-Cheng Luo, Kun Wang, Lu Zhang, Chi Cai, Bin Jiang, Hua World J Emerg Surg Research BACKGROUND: Using self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) and decompression tubes (DT) as a bridge-to-surgery (BTS) treatment may avoid emergency operations for patients with colorectal cancer-caused obstructions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two approaches. METHODS: We systematically retrieved literature from January 1, 2000, to May 30, 2023, from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, Wanfang Data, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies of SEMS versus DT as BTS in colorectal cancer obstruction were selected. Risks of bias were assessed for RCTs and cohort studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2 and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions. Certainty of evidence was determined using the Graded Recommendation Assessment. Odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to analyze measurement data. RESULTS: We included eight RCTs and eighteen cohort studies involving 2,061 patients (SEMS, 1,044; DT, 1,017). Pooled RCT and cohort data indicated the SEMS group had a significantly higher clinical success rate than the DT group (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.04, 3.81, P = 0.04), but no significant difference regarding technical success (OR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.56, 2.96, P = 0.55). SEMS had a shorter postoperative length of hospital stays (MD = − 4.47, 95% CI − 6.26, − 2.69, P < 0.00001), a lower rates of operation-related abdominal pain (OR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.05, 0.50, P = 0.002), intraoperative bleeding (MD = − 37.67, 95% CI − 62.73, − 12.60, P = 0.003), stoma creation (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.23, 0.73, P = 0.002) and long-term tumor recurrence rate than DT (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.22, 0.99, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: SEMS and DT are both safe as BTS to avoid emergency surgery for patients with colorectal cancer obstruction. SEMS is preferable because of higher clinical success rates, lower rates of operation-related abdominal pain, intraoperative bleeding, stoma creation, and long-term tumor recurrence, as well as a shorter postoperative length of hospital stays. Trial registration CRD42022365951. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-023-00515-6. BioMed Central 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10536785/ /pubmed/37759264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00515-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ma, Wei
Zhang, Jian-Cheng
Luo, Kun
Wang, Lu
Zhang, Chi
Cai, Bin
Jiang, Hua
Self-expanding metal stents versus decompression tubes as a bridge to surgery for patients with obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Self-expanding metal stents versus decompression tubes as a bridge to surgery for patients with obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Self-expanding metal stents versus decompression tubes as a bridge to surgery for patients with obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Self-expanding metal stents versus decompression tubes as a bridge to surgery for patients with obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Self-expanding metal stents versus decompression tubes as a bridge to surgery for patients with obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Self-expanding metal stents versus decompression tubes as a bridge to surgery for patients with obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort self-expanding metal stents versus decompression tubes as a bridge to surgery for patients with obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10536785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00515-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mawei selfexpandingmetalstentsversusdecompressiontubesasabridgetosurgeryforpatientswithobstructioncausedbycolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangjiancheng selfexpandingmetalstentsversusdecompressiontubesasabridgetosurgeryforpatientswithobstructioncausedbycolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luokun selfexpandingmetalstentsversusdecompressiontubesasabridgetosurgeryforpatientswithobstructioncausedbycolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanglu selfexpandingmetalstentsversusdecompressiontubesasabridgetosurgeryforpatientswithobstructioncausedbycolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangchi selfexpandingmetalstentsversusdecompressiontubesasabridgetosurgeryforpatientswithobstructioncausedbycolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caibin selfexpandingmetalstentsversusdecompressiontubesasabridgetosurgeryforpatientswithobstructioncausedbycolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jianghua selfexpandingmetalstentsversusdecompressiontubesasabridgetosurgeryforpatientswithobstructioncausedbycolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis