Cargando…

Clinical Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of the Available Medical Options in the Treatment of Endometriosis-Related Pelvic Pain: A Scoping Review

Background: In this scoping review, we sought to identify published studies evaluating the drugs currently used in the treatment of endometriosis-related pelvic pain, with reflection on their chemical properties, pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and clinical efficacy. Methods: A literature search w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mikuš, Mislav, Šprem Goldštajn, Marina, Laganà, Antonio Simone, Vukorepa, Franka, Ćorić, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37765123
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16091315
_version_ 1785113003768676352
author Mikuš, Mislav
Šprem Goldštajn, Marina
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Vukorepa, Franka
Ćorić, Mario
author_facet Mikuš, Mislav
Šprem Goldštajn, Marina
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Vukorepa, Franka
Ćorić, Mario
author_sort Mikuš, Mislav
collection PubMed
description Background: In this scoping review, we sought to identify published studies evaluating the drugs currently used in the treatment of endometriosis-related pelvic pain, with reflection on their chemical properties, pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and clinical efficacy. Methods: A literature search was conducted with the use of the PubMed and EMBASE electronic databases, focusing on identifying articles published in English between January 1990 and 2023. Results: Based on the included studies, current therapy options for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain identified and reviewed in this article were: (1) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; (2) combined oral contraceptive (COCs); (3) progestins; (4) gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists; (5) aromatase inhibitors (AIs); (6) selective estrogen and progesterone receptor modulators; and (7) levonorgestrel-intrauterine device. Conclusions: Based on the published evidence, clinicians should consider NSAIDs, COCs, and progestins as the first-line medical therapies. Compared with second-line options, such as GnRH agonists/antagonists or AIs, the abovementioned first-line options are well tolerated, efficacious, and exhibit lower overall price. Future research priorities should be to identify novel target therapies and to evaluate the effects of available drugs through different routes of administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10537015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105370152023-09-29 Clinical Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of the Available Medical Options in the Treatment of Endometriosis-Related Pelvic Pain: A Scoping Review Mikuš, Mislav Šprem Goldštajn, Marina Laganà, Antonio Simone Vukorepa, Franka Ćorić, Mario Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Review Background: In this scoping review, we sought to identify published studies evaluating the drugs currently used in the treatment of endometriosis-related pelvic pain, with reflection on their chemical properties, pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and clinical efficacy. Methods: A literature search was conducted with the use of the PubMed and EMBASE electronic databases, focusing on identifying articles published in English between January 1990 and 2023. Results: Based on the included studies, current therapy options for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain identified and reviewed in this article were: (1) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; (2) combined oral contraceptive (COCs); (3) progestins; (4) gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists; (5) aromatase inhibitors (AIs); (6) selective estrogen and progesterone receptor modulators; and (7) levonorgestrel-intrauterine device. Conclusions: Based on the published evidence, clinicians should consider NSAIDs, COCs, and progestins as the first-line medical therapies. Compared with second-line options, such as GnRH agonists/antagonists or AIs, the abovementioned first-line options are well tolerated, efficacious, and exhibit lower overall price. Future research priorities should be to identify novel target therapies and to evaluate the effects of available drugs through different routes of administration. MDPI 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10537015/ /pubmed/37765123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16091315 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mikuš, Mislav
Šprem Goldštajn, Marina
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Vukorepa, Franka
Ćorić, Mario
Clinical Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of the Available Medical Options in the Treatment of Endometriosis-Related Pelvic Pain: A Scoping Review
title Clinical Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of the Available Medical Options in the Treatment of Endometriosis-Related Pelvic Pain: A Scoping Review
title_full Clinical Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of the Available Medical Options in the Treatment of Endometriosis-Related Pelvic Pain: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Clinical Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of the Available Medical Options in the Treatment of Endometriosis-Related Pelvic Pain: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of the Available Medical Options in the Treatment of Endometriosis-Related Pelvic Pain: A Scoping Review
title_short Clinical Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of the Available Medical Options in the Treatment of Endometriosis-Related Pelvic Pain: A Scoping Review
title_sort clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the available medical options in the treatment of endometriosis-related pelvic pain: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37765123
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16091315
work_keys_str_mv AT mikusmislav clinicalefficacypharmacokineticsandsafetyoftheavailablemedicaloptionsinthetreatmentofendometriosisrelatedpelvicpainascopingreview
AT spremgoldstajnmarina clinicalefficacypharmacokineticsandsafetyoftheavailablemedicaloptionsinthetreatmentofendometriosisrelatedpelvicpainascopingreview
AT laganaantoniosimone clinicalefficacypharmacokineticsandsafetyoftheavailablemedicaloptionsinthetreatmentofendometriosisrelatedpelvicpainascopingreview
AT vukorepafranka clinicalefficacypharmacokineticsandsafetyoftheavailablemedicaloptionsinthetreatmentofendometriosisrelatedpelvicpainascopingreview
AT coricmario clinicalefficacypharmacokineticsandsafetyoftheavailablemedicaloptionsinthetreatmentofendometriosisrelatedpelvicpainascopingreview