Cargando…
Viruses in Laboratory Drosophila and Their Impact on Host Gene Expression
Drosophila melanogaster has one of the best characterized antiviral immune responses among invertebrates. However, relatively few easily transmitted natural virus isolates are available, and so many Drosophila experiments have been performed using artificial infection routes and artificial host–viru...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15091849 |
_version_ | 1785113062308577280 |
---|---|
author | Kuyateh, Oumie Obbard, Darren J. |
author_facet | Kuyateh, Oumie Obbard, Darren J. |
author_sort | Kuyateh, Oumie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Drosophila melanogaster has one of the best characterized antiviral immune responses among invertebrates. However, relatively few easily transmitted natural virus isolates are available, and so many Drosophila experiments have been performed using artificial infection routes and artificial host–virus combinations. These may not reflect natural infections, especially for subtle phenotypes such as gene expression. Here, to explore the laboratory virus community and to better understand how natural virus infections induce changes in gene expression, we have analysed seven publicly available D. melanogaster transcriptomic sequencing datasets that were originally sequenced for projects unrelated to virus infection. We have found ten known viruses—including five that have not been experimentally isolated—but no previously unknown viruses. Our analysis of host gene expression revealed that numerous genes were differentially expressed in flies that were naturally infected with a virus. For example, flies infected with nora virus showed patterns of gene expression consistent with intestinal vacuolization and possible host repair via the upd3 JAK/STAT pathway. We also found marked sex differences in virus-induced differential gene expression. Our results show that natural virus infection in laboratory Drosophila does indeed induce detectable changes in gene expression, suggesting that this may form an important background condition for experimental studies in the laboratory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10537266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105372662023-09-29 Viruses in Laboratory Drosophila and Their Impact on Host Gene Expression Kuyateh, Oumie Obbard, Darren J. Viruses Article Drosophila melanogaster has one of the best characterized antiviral immune responses among invertebrates. However, relatively few easily transmitted natural virus isolates are available, and so many Drosophila experiments have been performed using artificial infection routes and artificial host–virus combinations. These may not reflect natural infections, especially for subtle phenotypes such as gene expression. Here, to explore the laboratory virus community and to better understand how natural virus infections induce changes in gene expression, we have analysed seven publicly available D. melanogaster transcriptomic sequencing datasets that were originally sequenced for projects unrelated to virus infection. We have found ten known viruses—including five that have not been experimentally isolated—but no previously unknown viruses. Our analysis of host gene expression revealed that numerous genes were differentially expressed in flies that were naturally infected with a virus. For example, flies infected with nora virus showed patterns of gene expression consistent with intestinal vacuolization and possible host repair via the upd3 JAK/STAT pathway. We also found marked sex differences in virus-induced differential gene expression. Our results show that natural virus infection in laboratory Drosophila does indeed induce detectable changes in gene expression, suggesting that this may form an important background condition for experimental studies in the laboratory. MDPI 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10537266/ /pubmed/37766256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15091849 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kuyateh, Oumie Obbard, Darren J. Viruses in Laboratory Drosophila and Their Impact on Host Gene Expression |
title | Viruses in Laboratory Drosophila and Their Impact on Host Gene Expression |
title_full | Viruses in Laboratory Drosophila and Their Impact on Host Gene Expression |
title_fullStr | Viruses in Laboratory Drosophila and Their Impact on Host Gene Expression |
title_full_unstemmed | Viruses in Laboratory Drosophila and Their Impact on Host Gene Expression |
title_short | Viruses in Laboratory Drosophila and Their Impact on Host Gene Expression |
title_sort | viruses in laboratory drosophila and their impact on host gene expression |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15091849 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuyatehoumie virusesinlaboratorydrosophilaandtheirimpactonhostgeneexpression AT obbarddarrenj virusesinlaboratorydrosophilaandtheirimpactonhostgeneexpression |