Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques
[Image: see text] Chemical gardens are an exciting area of self-organized precipitation structures that form nano- and micro-sized structures in different shapes. This field has attracted great interest from researchers due to the specific characteristics and potential applications of these structur...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37712591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c01681 |
_version_ | 1785113100165316608 |
---|---|
author | Aslanbay Guler, Bahar Demirel, Zeliha Imamoglu, Esra |
author_facet | Aslanbay Guler, Bahar Demirel, Zeliha Imamoglu, Esra |
author_sort | Aslanbay Guler, Bahar |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Chemical gardens are an exciting area of self-organized precipitation structures that form nano- and micro-sized structures in different shapes. This field has attracted great interest from researchers due to the specific characteristics and potential applications of these structures. Today, research on chemical gardens has provided deeper information regarding the formation mechanisms of these structures, and several techniques have been developed for chemical garden growth. However, they all show different growth patterns and lead to the formation of structures with a variety of morphological, chemical, or physical properties. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different production techniques on chemical garden growth, taking into consideration the growth patterns, morphology, microstructure, and chemical composition. The chemical garden structures obtained in seed and injection experiments, two common methods, showed highly similar surface structures, void formation, and chemical composition. The membrane growth method has a small number of applications; thus, it was comprehensively evaluated to add new insights to the existing limited data. It produced the most stable and standard structures in a flat sheet-like shape and showed different morphologies than those observed in other two methods. Overall, this study presented significant results about the effect of growth techniques on chemical garden structures and similar systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10537426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105374262023-09-29 Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques Aslanbay Guler, Bahar Demirel, Zeliha Imamoglu, Esra Langmuir [Image: see text] Chemical gardens are an exciting area of self-organized precipitation structures that form nano- and micro-sized structures in different shapes. This field has attracted great interest from researchers due to the specific characteristics and potential applications of these structures. Today, research on chemical gardens has provided deeper information regarding the formation mechanisms of these structures, and several techniques have been developed for chemical garden growth. However, they all show different growth patterns and lead to the formation of structures with a variety of morphological, chemical, or physical properties. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different production techniques on chemical garden growth, taking into consideration the growth patterns, morphology, microstructure, and chemical composition. The chemical garden structures obtained in seed and injection experiments, two common methods, showed highly similar surface structures, void formation, and chemical composition. The membrane growth method has a small number of applications; thus, it was comprehensively evaluated to add new insights to the existing limited data. It produced the most stable and standard structures in a flat sheet-like shape and showed different morphologies than those observed in other two methods. Overall, this study presented significant results about the effect of growth techniques on chemical garden structures and similar systems. American Chemical Society 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10537426/ /pubmed/37712591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c01681 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Aslanbay Guler, Bahar Demirel, Zeliha Imamoglu, Esra Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques |
title | Comparative
Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques |
title_full | Comparative
Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques |
title_fullStr | Comparative
Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative
Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques |
title_short | Comparative
Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques |
title_sort | comparative
evaluation of chemical garden growth techniques |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37712591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c01681 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aslanbaygulerbahar comparativeevaluationofchemicalgardengrowthtechniques AT demirelzeliha comparativeevaluationofchemicalgardengrowthtechniques AT imamogluesra comparativeevaluationofchemicalgardengrowthtechniques |