Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques

[Image: see text] Chemical gardens are an exciting area of self-organized precipitation structures that form nano- and micro-sized structures in different shapes. This field has attracted great interest from researchers due to the specific characteristics and potential applications of these structur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aslanbay Guler, Bahar, Demirel, Zeliha, Imamoglu, Esra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37712591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c01681
_version_ 1785113100165316608
author Aslanbay Guler, Bahar
Demirel, Zeliha
Imamoglu, Esra
author_facet Aslanbay Guler, Bahar
Demirel, Zeliha
Imamoglu, Esra
author_sort Aslanbay Guler, Bahar
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Chemical gardens are an exciting area of self-organized precipitation structures that form nano- and micro-sized structures in different shapes. This field has attracted great interest from researchers due to the specific characteristics and potential applications of these structures. Today, research on chemical gardens has provided deeper information regarding the formation mechanisms of these structures, and several techniques have been developed for chemical garden growth. However, they all show different growth patterns and lead to the formation of structures with a variety of morphological, chemical, or physical properties. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different production techniques on chemical garden growth, taking into consideration the growth patterns, morphology, microstructure, and chemical composition. The chemical garden structures obtained in seed and injection experiments, two common methods, showed highly similar surface structures, void formation, and chemical composition. The membrane growth method has a small number of applications; thus, it was comprehensively evaluated to add new insights to the existing limited data. It produced the most stable and standard structures in a flat sheet-like shape and showed different morphologies than those observed in other two methods. Overall, this study presented significant results about the effect of growth techniques on chemical garden structures and similar systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10537426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105374262023-09-29 Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques Aslanbay Guler, Bahar Demirel, Zeliha Imamoglu, Esra Langmuir [Image: see text] Chemical gardens are an exciting area of self-organized precipitation structures that form nano- and micro-sized structures in different shapes. This field has attracted great interest from researchers due to the specific characteristics and potential applications of these structures. Today, research on chemical gardens has provided deeper information regarding the formation mechanisms of these structures, and several techniques have been developed for chemical garden growth. However, they all show different growth patterns and lead to the formation of structures with a variety of morphological, chemical, or physical properties. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different production techniques on chemical garden growth, taking into consideration the growth patterns, morphology, microstructure, and chemical composition. The chemical garden structures obtained in seed and injection experiments, two common methods, showed highly similar surface structures, void formation, and chemical composition. The membrane growth method has a small number of applications; thus, it was comprehensively evaluated to add new insights to the existing limited data. It produced the most stable and standard structures in a flat sheet-like shape and showed different morphologies than those observed in other two methods. Overall, this study presented significant results about the effect of growth techniques on chemical garden structures and similar systems. American Chemical Society 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10537426/ /pubmed/37712591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c01681 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Aslanbay Guler, Bahar
Demirel, Zeliha
Imamoglu, Esra
Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques
title Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Garden Growth Techniques
title_sort comparative evaluation of chemical garden growth techniques
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37712591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c01681
work_keys_str_mv AT aslanbaygulerbahar comparativeevaluationofchemicalgardengrowthtechniques
AT demirelzeliha comparativeevaluationofchemicalgardengrowthtechniques
AT imamogluesra comparativeevaluationofchemicalgardengrowthtechniques