Cargando…
Prophylactic platelet transfusion response in critically ill patients: a prospective multicentre observational study
BACKGROUND: Response to prophylactic platelet transfusion is suspected to be inconsistent in critically ill patients questioning how to optimize transfusion practices. This study aimed to describe prophylactic platelet transfusion response, to identify factors associated with a suboptimal response,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04650-z |
_version_ | 1785113124872912896 |
---|---|
author | Reizine, Florian Le Marec, Sarah Le Meur, Anthony Consigny, Maëlys Berteau, Florian Bodenes, Laetitia Geslain, Marie McQuilten, Zoe Le Niger, Catherine Huntzinger, Julien Seguin, Philippe Thibert, Jean-Baptiste Simon, David Reignier, Jean Egreteau, Pierre-Yves Tadié, Jean-Marc Huet, Olivier Asfar, Pierre Ehrmann, Stephan Aubron, Cécile |
author_facet | Reizine, Florian Le Marec, Sarah Le Meur, Anthony Consigny, Maëlys Berteau, Florian Bodenes, Laetitia Geslain, Marie McQuilten, Zoe Le Niger, Catherine Huntzinger, Julien Seguin, Philippe Thibert, Jean-Baptiste Simon, David Reignier, Jean Egreteau, Pierre-Yves Tadié, Jean-Marc Huet, Olivier Asfar, Pierre Ehrmann, Stephan Aubron, Cécile |
author_sort | Reizine, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Response to prophylactic platelet transfusion is suspected to be inconsistent in critically ill patients questioning how to optimize transfusion practices. This study aimed to describe prophylactic platelet transfusion response, to identify factors associated with a suboptimal response, to analyse the correlation between corrected count increment and platelet count increment and to determine the association between poor platelet transfusion response and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This prospective multicentre observational study recruited patients who received at least one prophylactic platelet transfusion in one of the nine participating intensive care units for a period up to 16 months. Poor platelet transfusion response was defined as a corrected count increment (CCI) that adjusts for platelet dose and body surface area, less than 7 at 18–24 h after platelet transfusion. Factors associated with poor platelet transfusion response were assessed in a mixed-effect model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in patients with and without haematology malignancy and chemotherapy. RESULTS: Poor platelet transfusion response occurred in 349 of the 472 (73.9%) prophylactic platelet transfusions and in 141/181 (77.9%) patients. The mixed-effect model identified haemoglobin at ICU admission (odds ratio (OR): 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7–0.89]) and body mass index (BMI) (OR: 0.93 [0.89–0.98]) being positively and independently associated with platelet transfusion response, while a haematological malignancy (OR 1.93 [1.09–3.43]), sepsis as primary ICU admission diagnosis (OR: 2.81 [1.57–5.03]), SOFA score (OR 1.10 [1.03; 1.17]) and maximum storage duration of platelet (OR: 1.24 [1.02–1.52]) were independently associated with a suboptimal platelet increment. Clinical outcomes did not differ between groups, nor the requirement for red blood cells. Poor platelet transfusion response was found in 93.5% of patients with haematology malignancy and chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of critically ill patients, of whom more than half had bone marrow failure, almost three quarters of prophylactic platelet transfusions led to suboptimal platelet increment measured 18 to 24 h following platelet transfusion. Platelet storage duration was the only factor associated with poor platelet response that may be accessible to intervention. Trial registration in October 2017: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03325140. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04650-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10537531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105375312023-09-29 Prophylactic platelet transfusion response in critically ill patients: a prospective multicentre observational study Reizine, Florian Le Marec, Sarah Le Meur, Anthony Consigny, Maëlys Berteau, Florian Bodenes, Laetitia Geslain, Marie McQuilten, Zoe Le Niger, Catherine Huntzinger, Julien Seguin, Philippe Thibert, Jean-Baptiste Simon, David Reignier, Jean Egreteau, Pierre-Yves Tadié, Jean-Marc Huet, Olivier Asfar, Pierre Ehrmann, Stephan Aubron, Cécile Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Response to prophylactic platelet transfusion is suspected to be inconsistent in critically ill patients questioning how to optimize transfusion practices. This study aimed to describe prophylactic platelet transfusion response, to identify factors associated with a suboptimal response, to analyse the correlation between corrected count increment and platelet count increment and to determine the association between poor platelet transfusion response and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This prospective multicentre observational study recruited patients who received at least one prophylactic platelet transfusion in one of the nine participating intensive care units for a period up to 16 months. Poor platelet transfusion response was defined as a corrected count increment (CCI) that adjusts for platelet dose and body surface area, less than 7 at 18–24 h after platelet transfusion. Factors associated with poor platelet transfusion response were assessed in a mixed-effect model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in patients with and without haematology malignancy and chemotherapy. RESULTS: Poor platelet transfusion response occurred in 349 of the 472 (73.9%) prophylactic platelet transfusions and in 141/181 (77.9%) patients. The mixed-effect model identified haemoglobin at ICU admission (odds ratio (OR): 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7–0.89]) and body mass index (BMI) (OR: 0.93 [0.89–0.98]) being positively and independently associated with platelet transfusion response, while a haematological malignancy (OR 1.93 [1.09–3.43]), sepsis as primary ICU admission diagnosis (OR: 2.81 [1.57–5.03]), SOFA score (OR 1.10 [1.03; 1.17]) and maximum storage duration of platelet (OR: 1.24 [1.02–1.52]) were independently associated with a suboptimal platelet increment. Clinical outcomes did not differ between groups, nor the requirement for red blood cells. Poor platelet transfusion response was found in 93.5% of patients with haematology malignancy and chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of critically ill patients, of whom more than half had bone marrow failure, almost three quarters of prophylactic platelet transfusions led to suboptimal platelet increment measured 18 to 24 h following platelet transfusion. Platelet storage duration was the only factor associated with poor platelet response that may be accessible to intervention. Trial registration in October 2017: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03325140. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04650-z. BioMed Central 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10537531/ /pubmed/37759268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04650-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Reizine, Florian Le Marec, Sarah Le Meur, Anthony Consigny, Maëlys Berteau, Florian Bodenes, Laetitia Geslain, Marie McQuilten, Zoe Le Niger, Catherine Huntzinger, Julien Seguin, Philippe Thibert, Jean-Baptiste Simon, David Reignier, Jean Egreteau, Pierre-Yves Tadié, Jean-Marc Huet, Olivier Asfar, Pierre Ehrmann, Stephan Aubron, Cécile Prophylactic platelet transfusion response in critically ill patients: a prospective multicentre observational study |
title | Prophylactic platelet transfusion response in critically ill patients: a prospective multicentre observational study |
title_full | Prophylactic platelet transfusion response in critically ill patients: a prospective multicentre observational study |
title_fullStr | Prophylactic platelet transfusion response in critically ill patients: a prospective multicentre observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prophylactic platelet transfusion response in critically ill patients: a prospective multicentre observational study |
title_short | Prophylactic platelet transfusion response in critically ill patients: a prospective multicentre observational study |
title_sort | prophylactic platelet transfusion response in critically ill patients: a prospective multicentre observational study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04650-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reizineflorian prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT lemarecsarah prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT lemeuranthony prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT consignymaelys prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT berteauflorian prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT bodeneslaetitia prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT geslainmarie prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT mcquiltenzoe prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT lenigercatherine prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT huntzingerjulien prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT seguinphilippe prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT thibertjeanbaptiste prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT simondavid prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT reignierjean prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT egreteaupierreyves prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT tadiejeanmarc prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT huetolivier prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT asfarpierre prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT ehrmannstephan prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy AT aubroncecile prophylacticplatelettransfusionresponseincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy |