Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study

The number of patients on ventilators is rapidly increasing owing to the coronavirus pandemic. The previously developed Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (Q-RPN-IMV) for the care of patients on ventilators includes nurses’ thought processe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsukuda, Makoto, Fukuda, Atsuko, Shogaki, Junko, Miyawaki, Ikuko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37755344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13030101
_version_ 1785113160832778240
author Tsukuda, Makoto
Fukuda, Atsuko
Shogaki, Junko
Miyawaki, Ikuko
author_facet Tsukuda, Makoto
Fukuda, Atsuko
Shogaki, Junko
Miyawaki, Ikuko
author_sort Tsukuda, Makoto
collection PubMed
description The number of patients on ventilators is rapidly increasing owing to the coronavirus pandemic. The previously developed Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (Q-RPN-IMV) for the care of patients on ventilators includes nurses’ thought processes as items. This study aims to develop a short form of the Q-RPN-IMV for immediate use in practice and to test its reliability and validity. A convenience sample of 629 participants was used to explore the factor structure using factor analysis. The test–retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The study was a cross-sectional design instrument development study and was reported according to GRRAS guidelines. Q-RPN-IMV short form was divided into ventilator management and patient management. The ventilator management comprised 31 items organized into six factors. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.82 to 0.91, and the ICC ranged from 0.82 to 0.89. The patient management comprised 27 items organized into five factors. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.75 to 0.97, and ICC ranged from 0.75 to 0.97. The Q-RPN-IMV short form is a reliable and validated instrument for assessing care for patients on ventilators. This study was not registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10537706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105377062023-09-29 Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study Tsukuda, Makoto Fukuda, Atsuko Shogaki, Junko Miyawaki, Ikuko Nurs Rep Article The number of patients on ventilators is rapidly increasing owing to the coronavirus pandemic. The previously developed Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (Q-RPN-IMV) for the care of patients on ventilators includes nurses’ thought processes as items. This study aims to develop a short form of the Q-RPN-IMV for immediate use in practice and to test its reliability and validity. A convenience sample of 629 participants was used to explore the factor structure using factor analysis. The test–retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The study was a cross-sectional design instrument development study and was reported according to GRRAS guidelines. Q-RPN-IMV short form was divided into ventilator management and patient management. The ventilator management comprised 31 items organized into six factors. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.82 to 0.91, and the ICC ranged from 0.82 to 0.89. The patient management comprised 27 items organized into five factors. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.75 to 0.97, and ICC ranged from 0.75 to 0.97. The Q-RPN-IMV short form is a reliable and validated instrument for assessing care for patients on ventilators. This study was not registered. MDPI 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10537706/ /pubmed/37755344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13030101 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tsukuda, Makoto
Fukuda, Atsuko
Shogaki, Junko
Miyawaki, Ikuko
Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort validity and reliability of a short form of the questionnaire for the reflective practice of nursing involving invasive mechanical ventilation: a cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37755344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13030101
work_keys_str_mv AT tsukudamakoto validityandreliabilityofashortformofthequestionnaireforthereflectivepracticeofnursinginvolvinginvasivemechanicalventilationacrosssectionalstudy
AT fukudaatsuko validityandreliabilityofashortformofthequestionnaireforthereflectivepracticeofnursinginvolvinginvasivemechanicalventilationacrosssectionalstudy
AT shogakijunko validityandreliabilityofashortformofthequestionnaireforthereflectivepracticeofnursinginvolvinginvasivemechanicalventilationacrosssectionalstudy
AT miyawakiikuko validityandreliabilityofashortformofthequestionnaireforthereflectivepracticeofnursinginvolvinginvasivemechanicalventilationacrosssectionalstudy