Cargando…
Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study
The number of patients on ventilators is rapidly increasing owing to the coronavirus pandemic. The previously developed Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (Q-RPN-IMV) for the care of patients on ventilators includes nurses’ thought processe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37755344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13030101 |
_version_ | 1785113160832778240 |
---|---|
author | Tsukuda, Makoto Fukuda, Atsuko Shogaki, Junko Miyawaki, Ikuko |
author_facet | Tsukuda, Makoto Fukuda, Atsuko Shogaki, Junko Miyawaki, Ikuko |
author_sort | Tsukuda, Makoto |
collection | PubMed |
description | The number of patients on ventilators is rapidly increasing owing to the coronavirus pandemic. The previously developed Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (Q-RPN-IMV) for the care of patients on ventilators includes nurses’ thought processes as items. This study aims to develop a short form of the Q-RPN-IMV for immediate use in practice and to test its reliability and validity. A convenience sample of 629 participants was used to explore the factor structure using factor analysis. The test–retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The study was a cross-sectional design instrument development study and was reported according to GRRAS guidelines. Q-RPN-IMV short form was divided into ventilator management and patient management. The ventilator management comprised 31 items organized into six factors. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.82 to 0.91, and the ICC ranged from 0.82 to 0.89. The patient management comprised 27 items organized into five factors. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.75 to 0.97, and ICC ranged from 0.75 to 0.97. The Q-RPN-IMV short form is a reliable and validated instrument for assessing care for patients on ventilators. This study was not registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10537706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105377062023-09-29 Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study Tsukuda, Makoto Fukuda, Atsuko Shogaki, Junko Miyawaki, Ikuko Nurs Rep Article The number of patients on ventilators is rapidly increasing owing to the coronavirus pandemic. The previously developed Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (Q-RPN-IMV) for the care of patients on ventilators includes nurses’ thought processes as items. This study aims to develop a short form of the Q-RPN-IMV for immediate use in practice and to test its reliability and validity. A convenience sample of 629 participants was used to explore the factor structure using factor analysis. The test–retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The study was a cross-sectional design instrument development study and was reported according to GRRAS guidelines. Q-RPN-IMV short form was divided into ventilator management and patient management. The ventilator management comprised 31 items organized into six factors. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.82 to 0.91, and the ICC ranged from 0.82 to 0.89. The patient management comprised 27 items organized into five factors. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.75 to 0.97, and ICC ranged from 0.75 to 0.97. The Q-RPN-IMV short form is a reliable and validated instrument for assessing care for patients on ventilators. This study was not registered. MDPI 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10537706/ /pubmed/37755344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13030101 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tsukuda, Makoto Fukuda, Atsuko Shogaki, Junko Miyawaki, Ikuko Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | validity and reliability of a short form of the questionnaire for the reflective practice of nursing involving invasive mechanical ventilation: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37755344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13030101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsukudamakoto validityandreliabilityofashortformofthequestionnaireforthereflectivepracticeofnursinginvolvinginvasivemechanicalventilationacrosssectionalstudy AT fukudaatsuko validityandreliabilityofashortformofthequestionnaireforthereflectivepracticeofnursinginvolvinginvasivemechanicalventilationacrosssectionalstudy AT shogakijunko validityandreliabilityofashortformofthequestionnaireforthereflectivepracticeofnursinginvolvinginvasivemechanicalventilationacrosssectionalstudy AT miyawakiikuko validityandreliabilityofashortformofthequestionnaireforthereflectivepracticeofnursinginvolvinginvasivemechanicalventilationacrosssectionalstudy |