Cargando…

Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic continues to threaten global public health. Remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies have shown promise for COVID-19 treatment of patients who are immunocompromised, including those with cancer, transplant recipients, and those with autoimmune disorder. Howeve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirai, Jun, Mori, Nobuaki, Sakanashi, Daisuke, Ohashi, Wataru, Shibata, Yuichi, Asai, Nobuhiro, Kato, Hideo, Hagihara, Mao, Mikamo, Hiroshige
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15091952
_version_ 1785113242352222208
author Hirai, Jun
Mori, Nobuaki
Sakanashi, Daisuke
Ohashi, Wataru
Shibata, Yuichi
Asai, Nobuhiro
Kato, Hideo
Hagihara, Mao
Mikamo, Hiroshige
author_facet Hirai, Jun
Mori, Nobuaki
Sakanashi, Daisuke
Ohashi, Wataru
Shibata, Yuichi
Asai, Nobuhiro
Kato, Hideo
Hagihara, Mao
Mikamo, Hiroshige
author_sort Hirai, Jun
collection PubMed
description The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic continues to threaten global public health. Remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies have shown promise for COVID-19 treatment of patients who are immunocompromised, including those with cancer, transplant recipients, and those with autoimmune disorder. However, the effectiveness and safety of this combination therapy for patients who are immunosuppressed remain unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of combination therapy and remdesivir monotherapy for patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who were immunosuppressed. Eighty-six patients treated in July 2021–March 2023 were analyzed. The combination therapy group (CTG) showed a statistically significant reduction in viral load compared with the monotherapy group (MTG) (p < 0.01). Patients in the CTG also experienced earlier resolution of fever than those in the MTG (p = 0.02), although this difference was not significant in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.21). Additionally, the CTG had significantly higher discharge rates on days 7, 14, and 28 than the MTG (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p = 0.04, respectively). No serious adverse events were observed with combination therapy. These findings suggest that combination therapy may improve the clinical outcomes of immunosuppressed COVID-19 patients by reducing the viral load and hastening recovery. Further studies are required to fully understand the benefits of this combination therapy for immunocompromised COVID-19 patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10538070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105380702023-09-29 Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan Hirai, Jun Mori, Nobuaki Sakanashi, Daisuke Ohashi, Wataru Shibata, Yuichi Asai, Nobuhiro Kato, Hideo Hagihara, Mao Mikamo, Hiroshige Viruses Article The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic continues to threaten global public health. Remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies have shown promise for COVID-19 treatment of patients who are immunocompromised, including those with cancer, transplant recipients, and those with autoimmune disorder. However, the effectiveness and safety of this combination therapy for patients who are immunosuppressed remain unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of combination therapy and remdesivir monotherapy for patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who were immunosuppressed. Eighty-six patients treated in July 2021–March 2023 were analyzed. The combination therapy group (CTG) showed a statistically significant reduction in viral load compared with the monotherapy group (MTG) (p < 0.01). Patients in the CTG also experienced earlier resolution of fever than those in the MTG (p = 0.02), although this difference was not significant in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.21). Additionally, the CTG had significantly higher discharge rates on days 7, 14, and 28 than the MTG (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p = 0.04, respectively). No serious adverse events were observed with combination therapy. These findings suggest that combination therapy may improve the clinical outcomes of immunosuppressed COVID-19 patients by reducing the viral load and hastening recovery. Further studies are required to fully understand the benefits of this combination therapy for immunocompromised COVID-19 patients. MDPI 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10538070/ /pubmed/37766358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15091952 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hirai, Jun
Mori, Nobuaki
Sakanashi, Daisuke
Ohashi, Wataru
Shibata, Yuichi
Asai, Nobuhiro
Kato, Hideo
Hagihara, Mao
Mikamo, Hiroshige
Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan
title Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan
title_full Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan
title_fullStr Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan
title_short Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan
title_sort real-world experience of the comparative effectiveness and safety of combination therapy with remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies versus remdesivir alone for patients with mild-to-moderate covid-19 and immunosuppression: a retrospective single-center study in aichi, japan
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15091952
work_keys_str_mv AT hiraijun realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan
AT morinobuaki realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan
AT sakanashidaisuke realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan
AT ohashiwataru realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan
AT shibatayuichi realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan
AT asainobuhiro realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan
AT katohideo realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan
AT hagiharamao realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan
AT mikamohiroshige realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan