Cargando…
Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic continues to threaten global public health. Remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies have shown promise for COVID-19 treatment of patients who are immunocompromised, including those with cancer, transplant recipients, and those with autoimmune disorder. Howeve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15091952 |
_version_ | 1785113242352222208 |
---|---|
author | Hirai, Jun Mori, Nobuaki Sakanashi, Daisuke Ohashi, Wataru Shibata, Yuichi Asai, Nobuhiro Kato, Hideo Hagihara, Mao Mikamo, Hiroshige |
author_facet | Hirai, Jun Mori, Nobuaki Sakanashi, Daisuke Ohashi, Wataru Shibata, Yuichi Asai, Nobuhiro Kato, Hideo Hagihara, Mao Mikamo, Hiroshige |
author_sort | Hirai, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic continues to threaten global public health. Remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies have shown promise for COVID-19 treatment of patients who are immunocompromised, including those with cancer, transplant recipients, and those with autoimmune disorder. However, the effectiveness and safety of this combination therapy for patients who are immunosuppressed remain unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of combination therapy and remdesivir monotherapy for patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who were immunosuppressed. Eighty-six patients treated in July 2021–March 2023 were analyzed. The combination therapy group (CTG) showed a statistically significant reduction in viral load compared with the monotherapy group (MTG) (p < 0.01). Patients in the CTG also experienced earlier resolution of fever than those in the MTG (p = 0.02), although this difference was not significant in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.21). Additionally, the CTG had significantly higher discharge rates on days 7, 14, and 28 than the MTG (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p = 0.04, respectively). No serious adverse events were observed with combination therapy. These findings suggest that combination therapy may improve the clinical outcomes of immunosuppressed COVID-19 patients by reducing the viral load and hastening recovery. Further studies are required to fully understand the benefits of this combination therapy for immunocompromised COVID-19 patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10538070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105380702023-09-29 Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan Hirai, Jun Mori, Nobuaki Sakanashi, Daisuke Ohashi, Wataru Shibata, Yuichi Asai, Nobuhiro Kato, Hideo Hagihara, Mao Mikamo, Hiroshige Viruses Article The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic continues to threaten global public health. Remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies have shown promise for COVID-19 treatment of patients who are immunocompromised, including those with cancer, transplant recipients, and those with autoimmune disorder. However, the effectiveness and safety of this combination therapy for patients who are immunosuppressed remain unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of combination therapy and remdesivir monotherapy for patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who were immunosuppressed. Eighty-six patients treated in July 2021–March 2023 were analyzed. The combination therapy group (CTG) showed a statistically significant reduction in viral load compared with the monotherapy group (MTG) (p < 0.01). Patients in the CTG also experienced earlier resolution of fever than those in the MTG (p = 0.02), although this difference was not significant in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.21). Additionally, the CTG had significantly higher discharge rates on days 7, 14, and 28 than the MTG (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p = 0.04, respectively). No serious adverse events were observed with combination therapy. These findings suggest that combination therapy may improve the clinical outcomes of immunosuppressed COVID-19 patients by reducing the viral load and hastening recovery. Further studies are required to fully understand the benefits of this combination therapy for immunocompromised COVID-19 patients. MDPI 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10538070/ /pubmed/37766358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15091952 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hirai, Jun Mori, Nobuaki Sakanashi, Daisuke Ohashi, Wataru Shibata, Yuichi Asai, Nobuhiro Kato, Hideo Hagihara, Mao Mikamo, Hiroshige Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan |
title | Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan |
title_full | Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan |
title_fullStr | Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan |
title_short | Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan |
title_sort | real-world experience of the comparative effectiveness and safety of combination therapy with remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies versus remdesivir alone for patients with mild-to-moderate covid-19 and immunosuppression: a retrospective single-center study in aichi, japan |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15091952 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hiraijun realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan AT morinobuaki realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan AT sakanashidaisuke realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan AT ohashiwataru realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan AT shibatayuichi realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan AT asainobuhiro realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan AT katohideo realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan AT hagiharamao realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan AT mikamohiroshige realworldexperienceofthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofcombinationtherapywithremdesivirandmonoclonalantibodiesversusremdesiviraloneforpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19andimmunosuppressionaretrospectivesinglecenterstudyinaichijapan |